this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
860 points (98.4% liked)

World News

54654 readers
3055 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] swicano@programming.dev 299 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Ahhh, so "Honor killings" are now acceptable in the US.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 93 points 3 weeks ago

Then he ought to be put down, for his daughter's honor.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 206 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

This reads like it never even went to trial. The article says a jury “failed to indict” and the man was “never charged”.

I’m assuming it was a grand jury and somehow a bare majority or jurors couldn’t find cause to charge the man (who—at minimum—pointed a gun at his daughter’s chest and pulled the trigger) with any crime whatsoever.

Not a single charge or trial?

How?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 133 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 87 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Also she was Anti-Trump. And a woman. So it's okay.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 54 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They don't consider it a crime if they don't believe the victim is a person.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

Unironically a foundational tenant of the entire country.

Some of us have just done a better job of moving past it. (Dems enabled Gaza genocide so I'm not talking about Dems, at least not the politicians. I mean some individuals.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 60 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Grand jury. What little I've read keeps saying they tried for manslaughter. Also from what I've read, based on the dad's own statements he's clearly guilty of a number of crimes that aren't manslaughter. So it's possible there's some nazi-esque camaraderie here and the prosecutor intentionally flopped to get no charges. I'm not exactly sure how grand juries work on that front. Could they have tried for a lower level charge, then once the rest of the investigation uncovers things they just bump the charge up to the appropriate level of would they need to reconvene a grand jury? Could the grand jury have considered multiple levels of charges?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 62 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Grand juries are different than trial juries in Texas. They're nominated "respectable" members of society that serve terms for multiple months. It's remnants of Jim Crow that are alive and well, where rich white guys decide who gets prosecuted for what.

And Texas made it even worse a few years back. In 2008, a white guy called 911 because police his neighbor's house was being robbed. He indicated that the neighbor's were not home, and also that he was gonna shoot the burglars. The dispatch told him over a dozen times not to interfere, and he repeatedly said he would shoot them. As plainclothes police were arriving on scene, dispatch told him they were arriving, but he went ahead and shot the 2 unarmed burglars in the back while.they were fleeing, killing both. They happened to be unarmed.

The grand jury refused to indict him for a crime, but the familes sued the murderer in civil court and won.

So Texas made a law that if someone is not convicted of a felony for a gun crime they can't be sued in civil court over it.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 53 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So Texas made a law that if someone is not found convicted of a felony for a gun crime they can't be sued in civil court over it.

This is how you get vigilantes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

Grand jury indictments are required for felony charges to make it to trial, including felonies like murder/involuntary manslaughter.

Indictments are a very low bar (probable cause). In this case, it seems clear to me from everyone's accounts that, at minimum, this was a reckless homicide where the mishandling of a firearm resulted in someone's death, and therefore probable cause existed to indict, so this is very clearly a poor decision on the jury's part if the charge was manslaughter. I'm not sure if they tried to seek an indictment for involuntary manslaughter or murder though. Murder is a higher bar.

However this isn't necessarily a done deal. Double jeopardy does not apply to grand juries' "no bill" (i.e. the decision not to indict), so the prosecutor can gather more evidence or plan a different approach and try again. If, for example, they attempted to get an indictment for murder and failed, they could try again for manslaughter. This is really only news if the prosecution decides to stop trying to indict.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 143 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

He was gonna teach her gun safety, with a loaded gun while not respecting trigger discipline or the laser rule?

I'd say that's "a likely story" but the man's a Trumper so it's exactly the kind of stupid I'd expect.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hadn't heard "laser rule" before, I assume it's the same as "don't point it at anything you care about".

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 57 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes.

Essentially always pretend there's a deadly and infinite laser coming from the muzzle.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 51 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Just to add to this, it's a more helpful way to think about it, because people hear "don't point it at" and they think of "pointing" as an intentional action, like gesturing or taking aim, instead of thinking about all the small ways that a weapon moves as you reposition it or transition from one grip to another, and so on.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yup.

It makes you think about not just where you point it, but everything it might "slice" as you handle it.

Or even how you set it down, or move around one sitting on a table.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 113 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Okay, but, even ruled an accident, why is this guy not up for manslaughter charges? Do I grossly misunderstand what manslaughter is?

This is definitely some smoking gun tier bullshit, but even given every benefit of the doubt in the world, the negligence has to be criminal.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 59 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

It's a small town. He's probably buddies with all the cops and DAs. That shit is super common.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 106 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

"To shoot her through the chest whilst she was standing would have required him to have been pointing the gun at his daughter, without checking for bullets, and pulling the trigger," the coroner said. "I find these actions to be reckless."

Whoopsies! I usually make sure not to pull the trigger when casually pointing a loaded gun at a family member's chest. But that's just me being overly cautious.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 61 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I am baffled at how this doesn't constitute premeditated murder. They had some argument and then guy's like "know what? I know what I'm gonna do." And did it. What freaking horror.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

You missed the part where the guy said he didn't mean to do that and he's sorry.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I just accidentally beat my daughter to death. The bat just went off on it's own. I was just showing her the bat then all of a sudden she was bludgeoned to death. I have no idea what happened!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 84 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

"As I lifted the gun to show her I suddenly heard a loud bang," Kris allegedly said. "I did not understand what had happened. Lucy immediately fell." WTF!!! It proves he pointed the gun at his daughter, which is a big fucking NO NO! Worse yet, the damn thing was locked and loaded. Fuck him, charge him with murder.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 3 weeks ago

There's no excuse for it to not be murder, but the fact its not even manslaughter is a message.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is just an excuse, dude murdered his daughter and is trying to blame it on the gun. Guns don't load themselves, and they don't magically go off...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 25 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly this. I was taught not to point a gun at anything I don't intend to destroy, even if I believe it not to be loaded.

Anything less than that is negligent manslaughter at the least if the gun 'goes off' 'by accident', because you should never be in that situation.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Guns have more rights than women in this country.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I've been rewatching Bojack Horseman, and there's an episode where Diane convinces the state to pass common-sense gun legislation by making it "in" for women to carry guns. The eventually leads to the line, "I can't believe this country hates women more than it loves guns," to which the character with her replies, "really?"

I think that moment is, unfortunately, rather poignant.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 70 points 3 weeks ago

Texas is a shithole.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 69 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Supposedly an accidental shooting according to the article.

But sounds fishy to me, and yes, he should be in prison whether it was accidental or not. It was either a death due to deadly negligence or he's lying and murdered her, both of which should merit jail time.

Unfortunately guns are extra-legal here. The law or the people in most US cities doesn't care if the shooting was supposedly accidental.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, no, you don't get it - he's admitted that he was under the influence of alcohol while handling the weapon (which he was showing off to his famously anti-gun daughter in the basement into which she was not allowed prior), so it means he's off the hook, it was basically an act of God! After all, how can we expect to punish people for what they're doing while drunk, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 60 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, SHE'S the one with Trump Derangement Syndrome.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 52 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Kris reportedly moved to the United States when his daughter was still a child, and had previously been to rehab for alcohol addiction. He allegedly confessed to relapsing on the day of the shooting and drinking roughly two cups of white wine."

apparently its only bad when they send murders and rapists and they do not support trump or are part of his administration.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is the father even a citizen?

Hello ICE, I think I found one of those illegals 😏

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 weeks ago

A dangerous criminal too, the kind they promised they'd go after

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 48 points 3 weeks ago

Wow, that’s shameful and disgusting. 

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 45 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Well, at least all the Texan children of MAGAts know they can "accidentally" kill their piece of shit Trumpanzee parents without going to prison now there is a precedent.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RhondaSandTits 39 points 3 weeks ago

Oscar Pistorius was charged and convicted.

This case exposes USA as a bigger shit-hole than fucking South Africa. That is really saying something!

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yet again we see that for country that is insanely in love with guns, they have no idea how to handle guns safely.

I will recap the basics of gun safety for the folks in the back:

  1. Don't pick up a gun unless you are going to use it and know how to use it safely.

  2. The gun is loaded, on a hair trigger and the safety is off.

  3. Do not point the gun at anything you don't intend to kill or destroy.

  4. Finger out of the trigger guard.

  5. THE GUN IS FUCKING LOADED.

[–] sureshot0@discuss.online 21 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah that's how you know he killed her on purpose

It's so strange to me, the people that the public will hold accountable and the people who get a pass

Sometimes if I'm facing the wrong way in line at the grocery store or if I get randomly distracted by something, an old person or a woman will accost me, literally screaming and crying, complete with snot bubbles, because I've made some kind of basic and understandable error. I pressed the wrong button, I didn't see someone in line so I cut in front of them, I forgot to hold the elevator door.

This guy shoots his daughter and people are saying ridiculous shit, assuming that he's stupid or assuming that he's going to snap out of it one day. He can't just be a murderer. People are frothing at the mouth to make excuses for people like this.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 36 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Yep, sounds like the US to me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Different circumstances obviously, but parallels to Renée Good; women who talk back get shot.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago

Lawless shithole country.

[–] modernangel@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 weeks ago

"Texas fash bootlicker faces no charges for disposing of woke foreigner who happened to be his daughter"

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 29 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

My hope is that he will feel tremendous guilt for the rest of his life, and that his rationalizations might fool others, but never him.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

He had told her he wouldn't mind if she was raped, because he had two other daughters.

So no, he'll feel no guilt for murdering his daughter.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 weeks ago

Abort a dead baby? "That's a life sentence, you filthy murdering bitch!"

Shoot daughter for Donvict Drumpf? "There's not enough evidence to prove it was murder. We are just going to let him get away with it!"

load more comments
view more: next ›