this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
80 points (91.7% liked)

Fuck AI

6301 readers
1320 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Invidious link: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=rwsowgBE_P8

Dr. Angela Collier explains why human-shaped robots are not only the worst answer to any problem, but also how they are a figleaf for actual pro-slavery billionaires.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh my god, I love her Daria-meets-Sarah Silverman vibe.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

She's an astrophysicist so a lot of her rants are about space

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 4 points 11 hours ago

I love how hard she goes at the end of her videos recently. She's not afraid to say what we're all thinking.

Great video.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The argument made in science fiction literature, notably Asimov's work, is these robots exist in a wold designed for humans, and often use tools and machinery designed for humans. Making them humanoid meant one model of robot could perform a wide variety of tasks.

Of course, in his work, the Positronic brain is an incredibly expensive thing, and represents a huge chunk of the cost of the robot, so this made more sense than making every vehicle, tractor etc autonomous.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

these robots exist in a wold designed for humans, and often use tools and machinery designed for humans. Making them humanoid meant one model of robot could perform a wide variety of tasks.

She directly addresses that.

So what was your favorite part of the video?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 4 points 18 hours ago

I liked her argument about equating intelligence to adaptability and improvisation. A child doesn't need to operate in very precise conditions.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Counterpoint, Gundams are way fucking cooler than any robot you're thinking of. Checkmate

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

There is an Isekai where the protagonist is obsessed with mecha and he wakes up in a world where mecha suits are the dominant magic tool. He outright kills his rival at one point... but only because the dude was designing airships instead of mechas, and the protagonist knows how precarious the mecha domination is (cause humanoid robots are such a massive pain to work with/ use rather than specialized machines)

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 5 points 17 hours ago

But they're suits maybe?

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 9 points 18 hours ago

Personally I would like the robots from Interstellar. I'd be quietly working in the yard when I trip over a branch. A loud voice booms throughout the neighborhood: "Medical emergency! I am here to render assistance!" as an obsidian piece of abstract geometry rolls through the front of my house. As my house collapses I croak: "I'm fine really, no bother"

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

bUt hOw aBoUt tHe tOoLs, wHiCh aRe aLL mAdE fOr hUmAnS?

Yeah, thanks for pointing out the absurdity of that argument with the Roomba vs. Jetsons maid example.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I just want my Roomba to have the same sassy attitude.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I recently bought a vacuum / mop robot and have been impressed by how good it is. Not perfect, but 80% of the way there. Good enough to be actually useful. Human form factor robots, like AI, is not close to ready to be useful yet.

[–] fluxx@mander.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I have one of those lidar xiaomi robot vacuums with a mop. It would frequently jam and I would have to make sure to not leave chairs and stuff lying around to be able to make it run. But then new, creative ways of jamming would pop up every now and then. I HATED adapting my house for a stupid robot and used it less and less. When my daughter was born it was all over - forget about it, toys everywhere, I prefer having a dusty house.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

All that prep work to clean off your floor for the bot is work you'd have to do anyway with a vacuum and mop. I have another Chinese bot, a MOVA, but it's similar. You have to do prep. You have to maintain the bot. It doesn't clean everything. But it does a lot more than I expected. It cuts the overall workload. Like a dishwasher does. So I consider it a win.

[–] fluxx@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

No, I agree, I guess my point was - I thought I wouldn't have to as much, which I guess most people think when buying a robot vacuum or any other robot. Hence the reaction of many people when they see a new robot is - we're cooked. Yes, in terms of sheer manual, automatable labour, we may be. But not for anything requiring some intelligence. The surprising thing is - turns out a lot of things can be automated and thus useful.