this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
169 points (97.7% liked)

politics

28910 readers
1894 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A party that built its message around a strong, firm, and unequivocal case to end this war now would very suddenly draw attention to the undoubtedly dozens of congressional Democrats who would not echo this line. So what we get instead is limp process critiques, demanding pointless hearings, and bizarre attacks that Trump is not doing regime change fast enough. Polls repeatedly show the most common criticism of Democrats is not that they are too far left or too anti-war, but that they are too weak, that they don’t stand for anything.

Centering criticism of a deeply unpopular war on those carrying it out for not filling out the right paperwork or producing a satisfactory slideshow — rather than making clear, normative objections to a war of aggression — feeds directly into this perception. But perhaps it’s a perception Democratic leaders, and the pro-war, pro-Israel donors who fund their political careers, would prefer over the alternative.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ravenmark@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

Well, to be honest, there’s no reason to waste your breath asking to end it until that election comes up this November. And hopefully we can flip Senate and house.

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It's because this message isn't for the Dem base, it's for the Republican base. They stand to lose more votes than Dems have to gain with an opposition message. That's where the momentum is right now.

[–] webdoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The Democrats have been controlled opposition at best. After Bernie's fixed primary, then Kamala's fixed primary, Democrat voters just think it was an accident. It wasn't they failed intentionally to unleash the Epstein war machine.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The uniparty has never been less deniable.

The only way these factions maintain control over the U.S. government is through maintaining “full spectrum dominance”. Once that ends, the turmoil turns inward and the country rips itself apart.

Iran is the lynchpin.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

The DNC is a Zioninst Supremacist organization with primary mandate to ensure Zionist first rule over the US. "Donor pressure" to not endorse Mamdami, or Chuck Schumer's "my job is to gaslight the left into supporting Israel", or every Presidential candidate since Carter having Zionist absolutist devotion is simple proof of bipartisan subjugation to Israel's interests. DNC may well have preferred Trump in last election. They only solicited money instead of volunteers to help turnout. Even Bernie calling for a big tent party between genocidal Zionist supremacists and the genocide-concerned is an incoherent DNC first political position. Zionist/CIA controlled colonies are even weaker than DNC in opposing US/Zionist empire.

Poor relations with Iran, with only practical objective of destroying Iran rather than reforming it or befriending it, is part of US's 45 year greater Israel project. The Great Satan is only a Satan because it is a pure demonic asshole towards Iran and any group that has received support from Iran, and extreme unchallenged propaganda from US, includes that the Lebanese barracks bombing was done by a Lebanese group while US ships were shelling Lebanon.

The bipartisan/media warmongering in service of Israel means no mainstream voice condemning Israel's supremacist murderous/genocidal objectives. Only criticism of process and results is allowed, to avoid contemplating the fundamental evil of the US, its Zionist subservience, and the US's impending collapse.

The path to saving the US through UBI, and liquid democracy, is a military coup, but long term political platform of exterminating Zionazi influence over the US by delegitimizing politicians with Zionist views, and zeroing out financially all oligarchy supporting them. Nationalizing oil and weapons and media not out of a Marxist/DEI motive, but from an anti-treason perspective.

Still, the process of achieving maximum evil (complete destruction of Iran instead of any reform/relations to make Iran more successful) had the significant miscalculation in assassinating Ayatolah (very old and ill), and school bombing (no DNC criticism of even this), to unite Iranians behind IRGC, even if IRGC was still going to mount same defense, to allow same destruction level. "Surprise attack" strategy was categorically absurd and increases certainty of failure. Begging allies for help 2 weeks after start is an impeachable offense of failure of duty to Zionist ambitions. Process needed to be a long propaganda and bribery campaign targeting axis of demonism to prepare for a united collapse and failure.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Because not only the donors but a big part of the Dem's base, even here on lemmy that is an outlier, are pro-war.

[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Dems are in Israel's pocket as well.

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This ain’t a lie. Nope, uh uh, no way, or whatevs U say. It is a fact. Not a fringe thing at all really.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

So, I get that you're trying to be sarcastic or whatever, but you should know that AIPAC spending is public knowledge. So not only is it true that most dems are in Israel's pocket, it is also very far from a fringe belief at this point.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

The dems and the republicans are not the same party. But when it comes to American imperialism, they are both on the same side. Democrats and republicans are not the same. Regarding the imperialism, see for example how Biden and Obama handled Israel (60B in military aid). The democrats and republicans are not the same. See also Kamala Harris' DNC speech where she promised she would ensure America has the most lethal fighting force in the world. Anyone who thinks the democrats are the peace party is a fool. The two parties are not the same though, there is more to policy than foreign policy.

Inb4 "Oh so you think they're the same?"

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

Legally, the Dems hands are tied so all they can do is chirp. Regardless, the US is a two-headed beast and currently the beast is wearing it's republican face.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Because they're with Trump, they're just acting as if not

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Saying he has "no plan" is more effective because it attacks his self image.

Democrats calling to end the war would just be ignored.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats calling to end the war would just be ignored.

Also it would piss off their bosses, Israel and the military industrial complex

[–] berg@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

We can't be giving the people what they want, now can we?

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Exactly. We say end the war because there is no logic. No plan.

If we just say end the war with no reasons given, it's not as strong of an argument.

With all the muslim-hate, we can't hope to stop the war on moral reasons alone.

Making it about money is one of the better strategies to get Congress to stop it, (as shitty as it is, that's the truth).

[–] berg@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We say end the war

Yeah, but here's the thing... Dem leadership is not saying they want to end the war.

Thanks for reading the article.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Well the dnc is corrupt. I guess I was talking about the non corrupt ones.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We call this one "Democrats can never fail, they can only be failed"

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Explain your end game.

You tell people not to vote for the Dems, then the GOP keeps getting elected.

It's almost as if you want the GOP to win.

And if you're trying to build a strong, independent Left party, it's not working either.

[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 5 points 12 hours ago

Anti-republicans need to nominate better candidates.

The current Democrat party is controlled opposition and everyone who supports it is part of the problem.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

And if you’re trying to build a strong, independent Left party, it’s not working either.

That's not on the people who criticize the Democrats, but the people who defend them.

If it weren't for people slavishly defending the Democrats no matter how grotesquely right-wing they get, they'd have no choice but to shift back towards the left. But with their dedicated "less bad is good" apologists, they can keep on shifting right just so long as they remain a little bit less fascist than the Republicans, which means they can keep on raking in the corporate soft money in exchange for fucking all of us.

And they will.

[–] SpaceCrystal@piefed.social 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's liberal morons who always defend the Democrat party. No matter what facts we give them, they'll always make excuses for them & their politicians. It's one of the reasons why they're very despised by both leftists & conservatives & why I've become an Anarchist.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

You're right. It's why a two party system just can't turn out right.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So, no end game?

No actual plan?

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Your questions have zero useful context. Are you asking about Trump's end game? The Democrats'? Their critics'? Their apologists'? Mine?

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 50 minutes ago

I apologize for overestimating your reading skills.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Keep apologizing for the failure of Democrats and see how many wins you rack up with that approach.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Democrats say he has no plan because at a fundamental level, leadership supports most of the policies that Trump pursues.

Its not a question of the relevancy of Democrats or Trump's ego: Its that both parties accept and operate to support the same corporate, zionist, fascist donor base.

Its why you weren't permitted an anti-genocide candidate in 2024: Because it wasn't in the donor classes interests. Its why they convinced Democrats to hold onto Biden as a candidate long as they did. Its party of why Harris was effectively "selected" as the nominee instead of running a real primary (for example, as Jon Stewart had suggested). Its why Harris ran on a campaign of "Nothing would fundamentally change", while as an administration, having sold out both progressives and the BLM movement as a voting block in the period of 2021-2024. Democratic voters have been voting against their own interests, just like Republican voters, for decades.

There is no future or path to a better future through the traditional pathways to power in the Democratic party as it currently exists. Its structurally not possible. And this inability to adjust to an electorate with significantly different priorities than those who control power within the party is a constant headwind: By constantly being on the wrong sides of issues, like they are today, Democrats damage their ability to win elections.

For leadership, this isn't a problem: They still get the policies they desire. For the electorate, or people running for office who want to change the Democratic party to one people actually want to vote for, this is a huge problem.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

This is weak. The Dems have no control over what the Commander in Chief does. Nobody cares what their war plans are.

I agree that many Dems have weak values, though.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can't get around the paywall, but they're doing that thing where they pretend Schumer/Jefferies are "the Democrats" again.

Schumer and Jefferies will never go against Israel.

But they're the most loyal out of current Dems, not the norm

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

If they’re not the norm, why are they voted into leadership positions?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

It's time for them to be kicked put of their leadership positions. Not just primaried in the next election; sidelined in this session of Congress, right now.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 23 hours ago

I've seen "no plan" from other non-ghoulish Democrats too. Democrats who have also criticized the war on moral reasons, but "no plan" seems to be their most focused condemnation.

I think it's because they think it's the broadest message and likely to sap support. "Forever wars" are deeply unpopular, whereas just not killing innocent brown people gets "ok, but...". That seems to be the stand out sentient on Iraq and we tortured people and caused hundreds of thousands of death.

[–] Restaldt@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Because Netanyahu or his AI clone have Jeffery's original tapes of Donica

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Five letters. Starts with AI. Isn’t an LLM.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Now Trump is even begging former allies to help USA in the Hormuz strait. Maybe he should have thought of that, before threatening to invade allied nations, and starting trade wars with everybody, and threatening to abandon NATO, and completely fail to help Ukraine against Russia that is a common enemy to Europe and USA, but not to Trump because Trump is somehow compromised and a traitor to USA and democracy.

To say Trump has no plan is to put it mildly. Trump had a plan originally, and that plan is so simplistic only a child could conceive it.

The plan was that Iran should surrender or collapse quickly!

Yes that's right, that was the entire plan! As stupid as that sounds. And when that didn't happen, they were completely unprepared for anything else. Trump had the typical simple minded bully mentality, to sucker-punch Iran, with the expectation that they would give in immediately.

Instead we are seeing Trump once again dramatically increasing the speed of the demise of the American empire, just as he did with the above mentioned behavior, threatening allies and waging trade wars against everybody.

As Trump stated: "I guess our relations aren't what they used to be."

Your goddam right they aren't. And just to be clear to the Americans, this is not just about Trump, it's the entire administration. And the fact that the American population elected Trump twice, means we don't trust the population either anymore.

To say Trump should end the war does nothing. At least not unless he is given some sort of out where he can save face. But that does not appear to be available that I can see. So as a result, he may just as likely try to put boots on the ground. And if he does that, he will 100% sure only embarrass himself and USA further. Because Iran is way way more difficult than Afghanistan, In Afghanistan there was a government somewhat in power that supported the allied forces. AND there were actually allied forces, which there won't be in Iran. And finally Iran is a 10 times harder nut to crack, because it has more than twice the population and area, and it has way better organized and equipped troops for guerrilla war. With more an better places to hide.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

the fact that the American population elected Trump twice, means we don't trust the population either anymore

I don't trust us any more, why the fuck should you? Idiots have taken over my homeland and I'm here to fight them until they are gone. But I'm one person and I can't make promises for my whole nation. We are not to be trusted until we have a system to ensure this never happens again.

Sorry.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

There are a lot of good Americans, and also exceptional Americans, unfortunately you are a minority.
And to be frank, it seems the American population isn't learning, because if they did, they wouldn't have elected Trump after electing Bush twice.
Bush was bad and extremely unpopular, yet Trump who is clearly worse than Bush on every single point was still elected twice too.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, what does it look like to "end the war". Even if they voted to end it, you can't unilaterally stop it, the time to stop it was before Trump started the war, now it can only end through a deal with Iran.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Why isn't there a deal yet anyway? After all Trump is the best dealmaker that has ever existed. He's been making deals his whole life, and they were great, beautiful, amazing deals. The Iranians will really fall in line facing the best, amazing dealmaker in the world.

[–] grumpusbumpus@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

This is one of the more profoundly well-put summaries I've ever read on the Internet.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Maybe because we hate Iran just as much as the right