this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
327 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

20582 readers
852 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Man I don't know if I could eat out of that canister.

Its so ingrained as "CHEMICAL, DO! NOT! EAT!" In my mind.

[–] tae_glas@slrpnk.net 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the part of the label specifying "100% edible" really doesn't help with suspicions either 🀣

[–] Janx@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

So are the stickers they put on bananas. And the banana peel itself! Doesn't mean I'm interested in eating them...

[–] starik@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That doesnt geht any reaction from me, as I dont use it. It's the USA safety sign, right?

[–] starik@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes. Health, fire, reactivity, and other. Each rated 0-5.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 5 points 6 days ago

0/5 health? You want to kill me?

[–] 5ha99y@lemmus.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you are a REAL lab rat, you don't really care. The stories I've heard of lab rats (including my own accidental stuff), I learned they don't really care at some point. They often say "Well, I must already have cancer, so what!".

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean... with that attitude and behaviour towards safety rules... probably yes.

And yeah, nothing worse for teaching students proper and safe handling of chemicals than old technicians. "we never used gloves to pour THF out of this 10L vessel!" "ah just don't breath in too strongly and if you feel funny, go to the window and get a quick breath of fresh air".

[–] 5ha99y@lemmus.org 2 points 6 days ago

Nono, it's not that. It's more like getting used to it over time, so people get more loosely about safety rules (which should not be performed but happens often though up to the point that you just don't get kicked). It's bad normal huamn behaviour.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"To be consumed by amazing scientists". So, not me then.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago

Nonsense, grab a handful smartypants. You deserve it

[–] Korval@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago

We get eye drops by mail from a local specialty vet pharmacy. For our first few deliveries, the mailer contained one plastic bag with a prescription bottle and a second baggie with two green mints. Or rather, I assume they were mints. They were green like mints, but the bag wasn't labeled. I don't think they were individually wrapped, but I don't exactly remember. I'm sure they were thank you mints, but I also couldn't quite bring myself to eat an unlabeled item from a lab. They don't do it anymore, and that makes me kind of sad.

[–] ODuffer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's a certified reference standard for scientific research, not food. The chocolate isn't even like expensive by the standards of NIST standardized food standards, e.g. NIST3287 blueberry is about half the price of the chocolate, but for 25g vs 455g.

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for the explanation.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

if you get bored:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crjxpZHv7Hk

he makes an awful cookie out of decade old NIST standard ingredients.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Nile red bought some and made horrible cookies. Turns out the chocolate was like a decade old.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine going to a lab, taking that out of your chemical drawer, and just yanking it into your mouth in front of everyone

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

sounds good, just need to find it somewhere

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wait.

Is... does your lab setup just include this as, like... you're just in very fancy box with a treat dispenser for when you perform well?

Or is management maybe using the paradigm of treats are always available at regular intervals, unless you fuck something up, then, no treats?

Are we running a negative punishment or positive reward kind of lab here?

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i think this is a container of ideal substance.

it’s kinda like there are a set of weights that is the master weight for metric, that all others are calibrated against.

this would be the ideal substance considered swiss chocolate, for use in verifying machines and other tests are calibrated to this substance.

from what i remember about these. they all taste terrible. but are technically edible.

[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 6 points 6 days ago

They tend to be labeled as "Intended for research use only. Not for human consumption." not as "To be consumed by amazing scientists."

It's actually a promotional item for the ideal substances from MilliporeSigma, though.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

... Ok.

That ... actually makes sense.

I must note that, not being a chemist or lab tech of any kind, my initial read of 'ideal substance' was platonic ideal... and I was going to ask some questions about that, but... not what you meant.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

right. they are, as i understand it, chemically ideal, created of chemically β€œideal” base ingredients, cooked at exacting temperatures and pressures, for exacting times. purified of anomalies at every step.

i imagine they taste like it too

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah haha!

I had to uh, frame shift my context for vocab... yes, that makes much more sense than... attempting to create a philosophically perfect example of a swiss chocolate, in a lab, hahaha!

How do we empirically measure a qualia, anyway?

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

An 'unsuitable for dogs and cats' label might be apt

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

is there swiss chocolate in there or swiss chocolate flavoured edibles?

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

How to keep your kids out of your snacks.

[–] the_beber@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

I found a blog post about this. The bottle in this particular image doesnβ€˜t look like the one in the blog post, but itβ€˜s a similar idea.

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Apparently this isn't for purchase anywhere. This would make a great gift for a science friend!

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t think cocoa can grow in Switzerland…

They've got some good dairy cows though, for the "milk" part of "milk chocolate"