this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
150 points (98.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

40297 readers
1083 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 105 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

First and foremost this would be a HUGE boon for small businesses. They are currently hugely outclassed in offering benefits which hampers hiring. It's also significantly more costly per employee for them.

Second, huge boon for employees who can change jobs left and right regardless of life circumstances. Currently the best way to improve your wages and/or get promoted to a bigger position is to get a job at a new company.

Third, huge boon for entrepreneurs who can now take bigger risks to start a new business because regardless of what happens, they don't have to worry about losing their healthcare

All of these things will have long term knock-on effects of leveling the opportunities for non wealthy people as well.

I'll say it for the millionth time. Every single stance the GOP takes is bad for small businesses, bad for the economy, bad for the country.

[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ll say it for the millionth time. Every single stance the GOP takes is bad for small businesses, bad for the economy, bad for the country.

Bad for PEOPLE in general.

[–] homes@piefed.world 7 points 1 week ago

Except for rich people.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Very well said. My old man can attest to the struggle of running a small-business with a couple employees while managing the overhead of health insurance both for himself, and them.

This is honestly how Democrats should be pushing it: We're Pro Small-Business. (1) Entrepreneurship, (2) Innovation, (3) True competition, (4) Keeping money within communities... I could go on.

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Don't forget, the Democrats have never put universal healthcare on their agenda and they've rigged multiple primaries in order to prevent candidates who would put it on the agenda from winning.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The GOP is mentioned because they claim to be the party of small businesses and are overwhelmingly supported by small business advocacy groups.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Global warming would probably be solved, because hell would also have frozen over.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

"Big news tonight. Congress has officially passed the Healthcare for All Bill with unanimous support, also, the Cleveland Browns have won the Super Bowl!"

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd probably go to the doctor.

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've got a bowel obstruction 2 years ago and i had to pay 6k for my deductible and my insurance paid 12k. I got a tube down my nose, some xrays and stayed a night. I currently know its going to happen again any day now and it almost happend two nights ago and I was in horrendous pain. I could go to the doctor and they could probably help me and stop it from happening again. However, I dont have 6k to spare to find out. So until it is debilitating, we'll just have to see what happens.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 49 points 1 week ago

A better life for 99.999999% of the country.

The other 0.0000001% are already so wealthy that their life will be exactly the same except that they will be furious about the 99.999999% having an easier life.

[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

everyone would be in better shape health-wise.

but also billionaires would lose money, which is why it'll never happen as things are now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

More entrepreneurship. Plenty more people would work for themselves or start businesses if they didn't have to worry about healthcare.

[–] Doublenut@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

This. I've said for years, it'd be a Renaissance of entrepreneurship and craftsmanship.

I've known so many people over the years that would have been fine getting by selling things they've made, or fixing others things, if they didn't need employer based Healthcare.

[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

UBI would be good for this also.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If healthcare were decoupled from employment, Americans could protest in much larger number and for a longer period of time.

A general strike would become viable.

[–] iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

and suddenly many people who have been wanting to start their own businesses, make that career move, or move to where the jobs are would finally feel secure enough to do so. I suspect this would boost the economy everywhere in ways it would be hard to predict.

[–] normalentrance@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

People would have more job mobility. You could quit (or get fired) and not have to worry about becoming bankrupt due to healthcare.

People that don't have insurance will be able to seek aid. Less people will die of preventable illness. People can focus on getting better without the stress of "how will I pay for this? I'm ruined"

[–] mikenurre@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The economy would skyrocket. Everyone, and I do mean EVERYONE would benefit. And there are people in this country so vile they would lose out on billions or trillions in profits just to screw over the masses. Imagine companies not having to pay 10-20k+ per employee for healthcare. Employees getting preventative care, being healthy, and being more .. PRODUCTIVE!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

US would start catching up to the technologically advanced nations in life expectency. A lot more people would start businesses or take a chance on dream jobs. The us would become more competitive with other countries as businesses would no longer have it as a cost. Its essentially like subsidizing your whole economy and many of our competitors do just that so we have to compete with that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Several people I know would retire from management level positions. It would energize upward advancement in a number of institutions.

load more comments (4 replies)

About half the US would declare civil war because they are so fucking stupid?

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

my friend would get the blood pressure meds he needs instead of searching for magic pills at the health food store.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HrabiaVulpes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Many companies would lose profit. Many greedy fucks would not be able to afford their third yaht and fifth house.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Approximately 1-2 million people employed in the mass bureacracy of claims processing and validation would lose their jobs.

That's how much of a gargantuan amount of bullshit the healthcare industry is, its so big that at this point, assuming the rest of the economy was doing fine, switching to universal health care would create a moderate recession, because so many bullshit jobs would no longer need to exist.

Obviously it would be a massive net economic benefit, but at this point, medicine is gonna sting a bit.

[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Approximately 1-2 million people employed in the mass bureacracy of claims processing and validation would lose their jobs.

Those "same" (number of) people would be needed to process the claims that needed to be approved by the nationwide system that replaced "for profit" healthcare.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm from Canada, and I know a surgeon and he has one admin. One (1) secretary that handles patient booking, billing, and payments. The benefit of a single payer system is there's one payer. The government. One set of forms to comply with. No rejections (almost always. Rejections come from foreigners or out of province coverage when determining which province is responsible for paying)

His software system (government provided) auto fills 99% of it. That's why he can have one (1) secretary. The government side Idk but it's certainly not insane ratios like the US since the process is far more streamlined and doesn't rely on appeals or rejections to racketeer more money out of doctors and patients. What's really sad is Americans are so conditioned to believe their way of life is somehow normal, that orphans must also be crushed somehow in Europe or Canada.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

That's not quite true. Medical billing here is hopelessly complicated, a universal system would likely have universal rules, and streamline the process of billing and payments.

So if a medical practice now needs 5 people to do the insurance billing, it might need only one if there was one payer (Medicare) or two if there was a German sort of system, but not 5.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Hope would exist again and every american could get back to pursuing happiness rather than lock in on survival mode only.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

FWIW universal healthcare is not single payer. Its nationalizing healthcare providers and doing away with health insurance entirely. Which is better than any single payer plan IMO. Hospitals have never really been successful profit generating ventures.

The entire health insurance industry would be deleted along with all the jobs and stock value it produced. And yeah fuck'em but there's going to be knock on economic effects from deleting an entire industry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Lots of people would exit the traditional job market, millions would start small private business. Pay would go up both because of the healthcare savings to companies and because people would stop working shit jobs for shit pay just to keep health insurance.

It might also lead to a massive recession as for profit healthcare providers and services last l lay off workers and go bankrupt.

So mixed bag probably good overall for workers, very bad for capitalists. But there would be a massive labor disruption and lots of people would be on the losing side initially.

I would support a transitional system where every say 5 years we lower the age for Medicare access so we gradually ween off the old system and the healthiest most profitable pool stays in the old system the longest.

It still screws over the next generation which I don't love or think it's fair but the ACA created a system so entrenched I don't think there is a way to roll it back without causing pain.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

While I don't think this is a really big thought in the minds of CEO of large corporations but by tying healthcare to work it does keep potential competition from growing in the marketplace. More difficult/impossible to start your own competing produce/service without healthcare.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Things happening to you medically would stop defining your life. I called for a check on something, get a date in 2 days and be scheduled for a radiology, all 100% free.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Instead of making people contractors to avoid paying benefits companies would make people employees to have more control over them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

We all saw the Regressives cut Medicaid without caring that it meant millions of citizens losing their health insurance. With universal coverage we’d see similar but on a bigger scale. Regressives will always play up spite and self-righteousness , will always find a scapegoat who is “cheating”, will always play up high taxes being “bad for business”, plus of course we’d all like to pay less in taxes. We would still need the “face eating leopard” meme. Even then, it would be better for the rest of us, but it would still be the same fight

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think the positive differences would be as dramatic as some here are proposing.

It would immeditately benefit a lot of people with existing large medical bills or chronic health conditions. But this probably wouldn't be an immeditately noticeable economic boon - instead, it would take the form of these people unburying themselves from debt and building up savings.

Over the long term, I would expect more small businesses, more people starting families, and more people choosing to retire earlier. But I think it would probably take a decade or more for this change to really be felt by those not directly impacted.

In the short term, there would be a massive economic restructuring as the entire health insurance industry collapsed overnight. Literally millions of people would be out of work. In the long term, this would be a good thing - but short term, it would be a very big problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›