this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
614 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

12100 readers
1976 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

I remain convinced I'll die choking on some stupid piece of food... I've had a couple close calls already. It's been a while though, probably so I let my guard down before the big one.

[–] Mistiygirl@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

damn. that's kinda accurate. the only thing i'd wanna point out is that literally everyone has to eat food to survive while vaccinations are not strictly necessary for survival.

otherwise this is spot on.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Strictly speaking correct, but back in the day, 40% of kids died before their 15th birthday, in large part because of smallpox, measles and diphtheria, the things we vaccinate for. It's not 100% like with food, but still very tragic.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Vaccines are 40% necessary for survival.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Unfortunately you'll also need to account for generally better access to nutrition in the modern era. The immune system has a better chance if you're not malnourished or starving all winter.

You could probably extrapolate this number by the death rates amongst just the nobility

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

But then you also have to account for all the processed garbage food we eat now also. There may be less kids starving now, but I wouldn't be surprised if the general quality of the food has also plummeted.

[–] Doom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. Nobiles of the past had a diet similar to ours. Higher fat, carbs, sugars, more processed, not exactly healthy. They were also far less active then their servants and highly, highly, inbred. And while they had healthcare, I wouldn't necessarily call it good healthcare. Having access to more food energy helps but it isn't a magic bullet.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

not exactly healthy

I promise it was a lot healthier than starving during the winter

As for the rest you're really relying on a generalization that's based on what is essentially the highest ranked nobles of the later Renaissance period.

In 1100 AD their marriages were insular, but not hapsburg level. And generally nobles were expected to have some martial prowess or at least look like they did.

But I think this comes down to the bigger issues of people lumping in the middle ages and the Renaissance, and to be completely fair no one specified either

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Although in the modern era, you also run increasingly into problematic pesticides, forever chemicals and food deserts delivering only ultraprocessed food. It generates different types of issues.

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Having an immune system that isn't ruined by diseases is required for survival though.

[–] Mistiygirl@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

mhm, but most people have that without vaccinations too.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, dum-dum, they have that thanks to the vaccination.

[–] Mistiygirl@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yes, you dumb dumb, I know vaccinations do that. Im saying that our immune system is actually really fucking good and humans did also survive until 40 and up without vaccinations for thousands of years.

Duh, vaccinations contribute a lot but are not strictly required for survival or a functioning immune system

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Some humans survived, a huge percentage of them didn't.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If I gave you a revolver with only 1 bullet out of 5 shots and gave it a spin, would you be willing put it to your head and pull the trigger?

Because those are actually better odds of survival than the average human faced before vaccines

The immune system isn't fool proof.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 3 points 1 week ago

As a species yes. But again, 40% were dead before 15. By 40 that percentage was even bigger. So most did not survive to 40 and up.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But the people without fully functional immune systems rely on the herd immunity provided by vaccinations, so...

[–] Mistiygirl@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm not arguing against vaccinations, I hope you realize that. I find it absolutely incredibly what we've been able to achieve in illness prevention and even erradication.

The only thing im trying to say is that we shouldn't understate how incredible the human immune system is, and saying it can't function without vaccines is just misinformation.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You know what would really highlight how amazing the human immune system is, instead of this antivaxxer line of comments?

How introducing an already dead or greatly weakened form of a disease to it gives it the fore knowledge on how to defeat the real thing in the future.

Like. A. Vaccine.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Calm down, Edward Jenner...

[–] Mistiygirl@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

aaaaand you missed the point again.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago

That's still you

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

saying it can't function without vaccines is just misinformation.

It can function without vaccines just fine.... Until it can't and some disease wipes out half of humanity. And that was all before the modern world was as connected as it is today.

Misinformation my ass.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_epidemics_and_pandemics

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Starvation is not contagious.

This meme fails to show the seriousness of the issue.

[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Every one, every single one, of the people who ate - finally died.

[–] peripheralneuropathy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's because lifetime exposure to dihydrogen monoxide gas exposure combines in the body to create methane and co2 contributing to global warming.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

8 billion people are currently alive who have eaten food

But for how long?!?

[–] Sidhean@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

"Every one, every single one, of the people who ate."

---Finally Died

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Human minds are simple. They aren't good with probability, statistics, volumes, or anything not linear. They are though amazing storytellers, fundamentally a human mind may just be that, a persistent story. In storytelling we simplify things into a finite set of groups, namely the groups we belong to and the ones we do not. Typically anything involved with the self is good and anything opposing the self is bad. Anything affirming one's view or story is accepted easily, if not automatically and anything opposing one's story is nearly impossible to accept regardless of its validity.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But that isn't god given. You can learn, you can try your mind to not be so one-dimensional. The problem is that most people on this planet are complete morons and the school system is failing them.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its just entropy, challenging views is a higher entropy activity. Not changing them, the mind literally requires less energy and thermal dissipation.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 1 points 1 week ago

You can only learn if you truly believe that you don't already know the truth. The issue with anti-intellectuals is that they honestly believe they already know everything there is to know about the topics they've taken a stance on. You probably don't bother verifying that 1+1=2, and an anti-vaxxer doesn't bother researching vaccines, because they're just as confident in their stance on them as you are in your stance that 1+1=2.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

Slap some tape on the leak and he'll stop.