this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
500 points (98.6% liked)

196

6485 readers
1036 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 53 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Fun fact: the German equivalent is with apples and pears which makes even less sense

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Apples and pears both give you delicious hard ciders!

[–] Rivermoonwolf@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes, and apples make the best non alcoholic drinks, imo

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

I disagree with you, but I respect the moxie of comparing apples and oranges and apples and pears.

Love apples, hate pears, can't eat both because they give me diarrhea :(

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Bitch that phrase don't make no sense, why can't fruit be compared?

-Lil Dicky

[–] UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 days ago

I've heard the dicky don't get little if you use it enough to not atrophy.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The most reasonable interpretation is that you cannot use the standards of apples on oranges, nor the other way around.

You wouldn't fault an apple because it doesn't have a thick skin that needs peeling.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

"You shouldn't judge apples as oranges"

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (4 children)

That doesn’t make sense??

You can still peel an apple and an orange. Even that’s still a comparison

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"This orange sucks. I can't just bite into it and enjoy it like an apple." That's not a sensible assessment of the orange. That's applying the desired attributes of an apple to an orange.

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ok but thats still a comparison??? Yes they’re different fruits and served differently, however fundamentally those are still comparisons in itself.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 4 days ago

Are you confusing "can't" and "can, but is fruitless" (pun intended)?

Like, if someone says to you "you can't put nails in with a screwdriver", are you going to say "You totally can. Just whack the nail with the handle. I don't see the problem".

Or, like, "You can't eat crayons" do you respond "sure you can. chew it up and eat it. i don't see the problem. it's just like a cookie"

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Yes, but you are comparing a serving choice to a serving requirement. It hardly seems like a fair comparison.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 4 days ago

The point of the saying is that you shouldn't fault a thing for not being like another different thing. It's not that you can't do it. But you wouldn't evaluate the quality of an orange on the same parameters you would an apple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe, but we have another expression with that meaning. You don't judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 1 points 3 days ago

I've never heard that expression before, but that's pretty good.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago

The vagueness of "compare" is the problem here.

If your job is to grade oranges for sale, and an apple hits your line, it will fail completely.

If your job is to grade apple cider for sale, and someone hands you a cup of orange juice, even the best orange juice ever created, you can't give it marks for how good it is as apple cider.

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How about comparing apples and liability insurances?

[–] LordAmplifier@pawb.social 9 points 4 days ago

Apples are usually cheaper than insurance and also far more nutritious

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 23 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Apples make jam, oranges make marmalade. Only apple juice turns tasty when fermenting it.

[–] UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 days ago

That's it...

Your компот privileges have been revoked.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Apple jam exists, but mostly apples make applesauce or apple butter or apple jelly. Or apple pie.

Orange pulp and pith turn bitter when cooked, which is why marmalade uses only the juice and a thin layer of the zest, which is boiled and drained to remove bitterness before cooking with the juice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 18 points 5 days ago

Spotting differences is also a form of comparison, so the phrase makes no sense at all

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Still better than the Portuguese equivalent: "what does the arse[hole] have to do with the pants?" (o que o cu tem a ver com as calças?)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] III@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The phrase is to say two things are not the same, not that they aren't similar.

[–] UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So why isn't the phrase that then?

"Apples and oranges are not the same."

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The phrase isn't "you can't compare apples and oranges" it's "it's like comparing apples and oranges". Meaning that what you're comparing are distinct things with their own merits, and it would be silly to try to declare an objective winner. It basically does mean that apples and oranges aren't the same.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Petition to change the phrase:

'You can't compare apples and tomatoes.'

... now it makes considerably less sense, and also does splash damage against the concept of a vegetable.

[–] lyrial@anarchist.nexus 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

10d4 psychic damage in a 20 ft. cube.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

... also, said damage cube is comprised entirely of Red40

interpret this as you will, DMs

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Velociraptors and rabbits are both land dwelling creatures, that existed on the planet earth, and both featured in the game Amju pet zoo. Why can't we compare them?!?

Pretty much everything we have knowledge of is linked in some way, the question of the comparison depends on the properties we wish to compare.

"Apples to oranges" is saying "these are two different things, and your comparison is shit".

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

and this, 🟠, is a tangerine

[–] Rivermoonwolf@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

French version is "from ass to cock", IE, from donkey to chicken.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Anything can be compared to anything. It's trivial to find some axis they share.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 9 points 5 days ago
[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

THANK YOU!! When that analogy was taught to us, we found it profoundly stupid, both are categorized as fruits, both can used to make juices, both grow on trees, both are yummy, what isn’t there to be able to compare?!

We’re wonder what the fuck was going in inside their head while making that analogy.

[–] Una@europe.pub 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How about comparing dark energy with Graphene OS?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Nerds talk about both, but as far as most people are concerned they're just imaginary concepts?

load more comments
view more: next ›