190
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by KiraChats@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

PDF

Note that the USA is not a member of the International Criminal Court. And in 2002, the USA passed The American Service-Members' Protection Act (known informally as the "Hague Invasion Act"), wherein the USA authorized itself to order military action (including invading the Netherlands where the Hague is located) to protect and free Americans and their allies (including Israel) from custody. It's why George W Bush doesn't fear ICC consequences for his war crimes.


Edit: I originally had the title as "South Africa has applied for the International Court of Justice (colloquially known as 'The Hague' to go after Israel" but SoyViking provided me with education in the comments on why this is not entirely accurate, as well as elucidated some important distinctions between the ICJ and ICC:

Sorry for being a nerd but the International Court of Justice, while also being situated in the Hague, is a different body than the International Criminal Court, which is colloquially called the Hague.

The ICJ dates back to the League of Nations and adjudicates international law disputes between sovereign states, meaning that only states can be parties in cases heard by the ICJ. Their ability to actually enforce their rulings are limited and it is completely possible for states, especially those of the International Community, to go "no that's bollocks" and ignore their decisions.

The ICC is a much more recent invention. They adjudicate criminal cases against individuals. Their actual powers are more tangible than those of the ICJ. If the ICC issues an arrest warrant against someone there's a decent chance that member states of the ICC will actually arrest that individual and extradite them to the Hague. Once there, people who are convicted actually goes to real jail. This is also the reason for the American "Hague Invasion Act" that is an explicit threat that if an American war criminal is extradited to the ICC, the evil empire will invade the Netherlands to break him out of jail.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RION@hexbear.net 63 points 7 months ago

If I had a nickel for every Hexbear ITT that didn't know South Africa is no longer under the apartheid govt I'd have two nickels. Which isn't much but it's weird that it happened twice

[-] KiraChats@hexbear.net 35 points 7 months ago

yeah that was uh weird

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 34 points 7 months ago

My hope is that they are just making some commentary on how the liberals in charge of modern South Africa have subverted the process of reparations, making their attacks on another apartheid state a little odd, but that's my completely baseless headcanon of what those Hexbears are trying to say

[-] Xx_Aru_xX@hexbear.net 32 points 7 months ago

how tf did that happen lmao

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 36 points 7 months ago

Nelson Mandela got Mandela effected I guess lol

[-] Saeculum@hexbear.net 28 points 7 months ago

Some people here are perpetually living in 1982

[-] WashedAnus@hexbear.net 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 19 points 7 months ago

Beats living in perpetual 2016

[-] operacion_ogro@hexbear.net 15 points 7 months ago

BlackMoldPasts

[-] ChapoKrautHaus@hexbear.net 56 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And in 2002, the USA passed The American Service-Members' Protection Act (known informally as the "Hague Invasion Act"), wherein the USA authorized itself to order military action (including invading the Netherlands where the Hague is located) to protect and free Americans and their allies

Here's a fun lil game: guess how the following US senators voted on the Hague invasion act.

  1. Joe Biden
  2. Hillary Clinton
  3. Rick Santorum
  4. John McCain

--

spoilerYay

Yay

Nay

Nay

[-] KiraChats@hexbear.net 39 points 7 months ago

oh for fuck's sake!!!!!

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 22 points 7 months ago

John McCain suprises me. Must have been some weird party line thing where to ghouls want it pased, but have to put on an act for the rubes

[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

That's what being a maverick is all about

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 51 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

At least we're doing something right lol. The ANC have thankfully always been allied with Palestine and their right to self determination, and been against the Israeli government.

A reminder of what Nelson Mandela said when visiting Gaza in 1999

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 39 points 7 months ago

Sorry for being a nerd but the International Court of Justice, while also being situated in the Hague, is a different body than the International Criminal Court, which is colloquially called the Hague.

The ICJ dates back to the League of Nations and adjudicates international law disputes between sovereign states, meaning that only states can be parties in cases heard by the ICJ. Their ability to actually enforce their rulings are limited and it is completely possible for states, especially those of the International Community, to go "no that's bollocks" and ignore their decisions.

The ICC is a much more recent invention. They adjudicate criminal cases against individuals. Their actual powers are more tangible than those of the ICJ. If the ICC issues an arrest warrant against someone there's a decent chance that member states of the ICC will actually arrest that individual and extradite them to the Hague. Once there, people who are convicted actually goes to real jail. This is also the reason for the American "Hague Invasion Act" that is an explicit threat that if an American war criminal is extradited to the ICC, the evil empire will invade the Netherlands to break him out of jail.

[-] KiraChats@hexbear.net 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Ah, thank you for the education! Is the ICJ connected to the ICC? I'm looking to edit the post to be more accurate. I'm thinking:

Title: South Africa has applied for the International Court of Justice to go after Israel

Description: Same as before with the addendum: thank you to SoyViking for education in the comments (then paste your comment)

Edit: ok I updated it, let me know if this makes you uncomfortable or anything and I'll happily change it <3 and once again, thank you for the education

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The ICJ dates back to the League of Nations

Uh um err sir sir sir ACKSHUALLY the ICJ has only been around since 1945, it was the PCIJ which dated back to the League of Nations, although of course Article 38.1 of the Statute of the ICJ recognizes judicial decisions from the PCIJ as a source of international law, inter alia.

nerd

What next, are you going to tell me shooting down a commercial airliner violates jus cogens??

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 33 points 7 months ago

I know this won't lead to much of anything

But I do like throwing rules-based order at rules-based orderites

[-] KiraChats@hexbear.net 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

sigh At least it's on the books

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 16 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it's more than what usually happens

[-] the_kid@hexbear.net 29 points 7 months ago

this is just unfair. they took apartheid away from Afrikaners once - ok fine, they moved to Israel. now they're in Israel and you're trying to take apartheid away from them again? this is ethnic cleansing

[-] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 24 points 7 months ago

Wish germany-cool could learn and grow from their past like this, instead they've just doubled down on genocide

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

What Germany took from the experience: Don't do genocide*

*To Jewish people**

spoiler ** Again :::

[-] huf@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

well yeah but that makes sense, since there arent many jews living in and around germany anymore

there's no need for a second european jewish genocide by germany, and germans being thrifty people...

[-] citrussy_capybara@hexbear.net 23 points 7 months ago

imagine doing so much apartheid, genocide, and racism that South Africa sues for international copyright infringement

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 59 points 7 months ago

The apartheid government hasn't been in power for nearly three decades. The people that fought against apartheid are filing this measure.

[-] citrussy_capybara@hexbear.net 11 points 7 months ago

you missed correcting that no “suing” is occurring and that it isn’t for “international copyright infringement”, which further indicate that the comment isn’t to be taken seriously

the ratio indicates it was a hack failure of a bit, and certainly more effort will be rerouted to post better

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 13 points 7 months ago

I enjoyed your hack failure of a bit

[-] allthetimesivedied@hexbear.net 13 points 7 months ago
[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 12 points 7 months ago

Let the country hold the baby

People can change

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
190 points (100.0% liked)

news

23346 readers
607 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS