945
Clever, clever (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 128 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I like to royally fuck with chatGPT. Here's my latest, to see exactly where it draws the line lol:

https://chatgpt.com/share/671d5d80-6034-8005-86bc-a4b50c74a34b

TL;DR: your internet connection isn't as fast as you think

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

Til, I cum at 6 petabyte per second

[-] jawa21 108 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the hiway.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Ages ago, there was a time where my dad would mail back up tapes for offsite storage because their databases were large enough that it was faster to put it through snail mail.

It should also be noted his databases were huge, (they’d be bundled into 70 pound packages and shipped certified.)

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Just a couple of years ago I was sent a dataset by mail, around 1TB on a hard drive.

Later I worked on visualization of large datasets, we didn't have the space to store them locally because they were up to a PB.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Mail dataset in standard-compliant way. Like RFC1149. Don't forget that carrier should be avian carrier.

we didn't have the space to store them locally because they were up to a PB.

Local is very vague word. It can be argued, that anything, that doesn't fit into L1 cache is not local.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Local as not in the building in that case :-)

RFC1149 lol yeah wasn't that a norwegian experiment at some sub-bits per second? Thanks for making me remember!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

We’re storing data in peanut butter? Please tell me there’s jam involved.

/j it’s amazing we’re talking about petabytes. My first computer had like 600 meg. (Pentium 486 cobbled out of spare- old- parts from my dad’s ~~junk~~”Parts” rack.)

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

😁 ya my first "computer" was a ZX-81 with 1kB of ram, type too much and it was full! A card with a whopping 16kB later came to the rescue.

It's been a wild time in history.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 39 points 20 hours ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

Peregrine falcons FTL…

(There’s this fat fucker that hunts off our building’s rooftop. It waits for a pigeon to strike the neighboring buildings windows and scoops them up. Some how it’s reassuring to know that humans aren’t the only lazy animals. Peregrine are freaking cool though.)

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

That's smart predator behavior! Cull the stupid and injured. Save energy and reduce risk. Live long and prosper.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I'm laughing my ass off at this

Edit:

https://chatgpt.com/share/671da57b-5fe4-8005-bdba-68b69f398c72

Still fucking amazing

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 17 hours ago

Awesome bandwidth to be sure, but I do think there is a difference between data transfer to RAM (such as network traffic) vs. traffic purely from one location to another (station wagon with tapes/747 with SD cards/etc.).

For the latter, actually using the data in any meaningful way is probably limited to read time of the media, which is likely slow.

But yeah, my go-to would be micro SD cards on a plane :)

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Well, it depends on the purpose of the data. If it’s meant as an offsite backup… well… you’re probably it driving them just down the street anyway.

[-] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

or a train full of dudes jorking it like that one NSFW copypasta

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 22 points 21 hours ago

I like to manipulate dallee a lot by making fantastical reasons why I need edgy images.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 12 points 20 hours ago

I've been down that rabbit hole too, but if I see that fucking dog again, I'm going to rage

[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 8 points 20 hours ago
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 19 points 19 hours ago

They use this picture of a dog with a ball when they censor your shit on the Bing image app

[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

That's cute. Thank you.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 8 points 19 hours ago

McGruff, the crime dog

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 19 hours ago

Is that now 6 comma 016 or 6016?

We do , and . for parts, ' for thousands here.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 6 points 18 hours ago

6.065 petabytes a second or 6065 Tb/s

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
945 points (97.7% liked)

Science Memes

10783 readers
3005 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS