300
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Platypus@lemmings.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Rules: explain why

Ready player one.

That has to be one of the cringiest movies I've seen, is tries so hard, too hard with it's "WE LOVE YOU NERD, YOU'RE SO COOL FOR PLAYING GAMES AND GETTING THIS 80S REFERENCE" message and the whole "corporation bad, the people good" narrative seems written for toddlers... The fan service feels cheap and adds nothing to the story.

Finally, they trying to make the people believe that very attractive girl with a barely visible red tint spot on her face is "ugly"... Like wtf?

Yet it received decent reviews plus being one of the most successful movies of that year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago

James Cameron’s Avatar series.

Then again… Does anyone actually like it? It seems to have all this online hype when it’s such a boring visual spectacle.

It’s like the opposite of the other Avatar franchise, which wasn’t a commercial hit, and seems less popular on paper, but seems to have a massive cultural impact.

[-] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago

My understanding of most people's opinion is that the visuals are stunning but otherwise whatever. It's definitely mine. Avatar 2 has one of the worst written and worst paced stories I have seen in a long time. But it's still almost worth the watch solely to admire the visuals that over-shadow other movies by a mile.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I like both Avatars, both for the same reason:

A lot of work was put into creating a tangible world that isn't Earth. If it weren't for the clearly "magic" elements (also counts for both Avatars) I feel like I could almost... Reach out and touch the world.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is true. Some elements of JC Avatar were super interesting and detailed. Like the spaceship, that was *ridiculously well-thought-out for such a brief appearance, and no telling how much time was spent on the fauna.

But... they made the overarching story and characters so unremarkable.

I felt something similar watching Black Panther: Wakanda Forever. Talokan (the underwater city) was breathtaking and incredible, no telling how much labor was put into it... only for that gorgeous setting to be used for a brief swim through and never seen again.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago

You just reminded me of this video again, that explains how unfortunately the world building that went into the music didn't make it to the movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tL5sX8VmvB8

[-] 200ok@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

That was amazing. Thanks for sharing!

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

the worldbuilding is what's interesting in Avatar, imho. The visuals support that. Story wise it doesn't do a good job of being surprising

[-] Azal@pawb.social 5 points 6 days ago

See, I'm baffled by this one, now I've only seen the first movie so maybe there's something in the second I don't know about in world building. But the first, the world building was to me... meh? Okay, the alien planet was interesting, they have a culture, they seemed to do a fine job with that, cool. But the story makes humanity so blitheringly stupid that I cannot comprehend the worldbuilding beyond "We need some Captain Planet level villains." They're after unobtanium, a mineral that has properties for anti-gravity and wrecking havok on radar. Soooooo.... We're going to work hard on inserting someone to convince the locals to dig up under the religious tree for the major vein of it instead of the MULTIPLE floating mountains all over the place.

Which then when the military decides to do its thing, this spacefaring species uses glorified helicopters that fly lower and slower than modern military aircraft, again through the mountains of unobtainium in a low altitude approach for a strike operation that only makes sense if the enemy has radar... which the aliens definitely did not. I seriously might have missed something but I couldn't get past humanity in it was just carrying the idiot ball throughout the movie.

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Yea all that to me belongs to script. And I agree it's not very good. When I say worldbuilding, I'm talking about the ecosystem and its interconnectedness. It does a good job of mirroring the Earth's and I consider it to be a proper -although indirect- awakening to the beauty of terrestrial biology.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

It was praised in its theatrical release, and I remember being one of the few people that didn't like it.

When it came out for home release, public opinion shifted on it quickly. When it can't use its 3D effects to wow the audience and make it go "Look at that creature, look at those plants, isn't this fun and imaginative." its story has to stand on its own. And since that story is "Dances With Smurfs: Baby's First Creative Writing Project"... Yeaaaah no

I knew it was going to be shit when in an interview James Cameron said "You can see how even the best humans are bad people and even the worst Na'vi are good people!", and me being a writer immediately saw a red flag.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is true, I remember it being lauded in theaters.

I mean, I guess not everyone is media savvy and the story could have felt "new" to some, but there wasn't a character that stood out or anything, no cast stealing the show...

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

The vibe I got was that people were oohed and ahhed by the "Colors man!"

But if I wanted that I could just stayed home, put on some synthwave, and eat some of those psycilosibin gummies they sell at vape shops.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

I liked the first one!on acid. On a 3D TV. I don’t see myself ever watching the second.

[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

After leaving the theatre:

"Did I just pay 20 bucks to watch a CGI rip-off of "Dances With Wolves"?

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

I remember one critic called it “Dances with Smurfs”

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Thats perfect.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I don't know why everyone jumps to Dances With Wolves. It's clearly Pocahontas.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

I always thought it was the last fern gully

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[-] Blubber28@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I believe the impact was mostly to do with the visuals. And, honestly, that is very fair. While it is inctedibly dull and cringe story-wise, the visuals are phenominal, especially since the movie is now already 15 years old.

I feel the same way about Jurassic Park in that sense, though it is much less cringe than Avatar (but still pretty basic story-wise).

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But the original Jurassic Park was fun. The writing was sharp and memorable, the cast charismatic, even if the plot is not that important (which is fine).

I did love JC Avatar's alien flora and fauna, and some small details like the realistic spaceship, but I guess it feels much less exciting in hindsight without anything to "attach" it to.

And again... the IP its name collides with is nothing to sneeze at, visually. You can pause it almost anywhere, even in "mundane" scenes, and get gorgeous fantasy shots and incredible music:

[-] thisbenzingring 6 points 1 week ago

I have never seen it. I got wind of the similarities between the American Indian Wars and Dances With Wolves/Ferngully and decided that my time and money were better spent elsewhere. I don't need another reminder of the pain it is to be Lakota and look into the past.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

The funny thing is James Cameron acts like the movie and message are so profound.

[-] Azal@pawb.social 3 points 6 days ago

Honestly at this point I think he's saying whatever he can to continue funding his submarine hobby.

[-] keyez@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

He's not completely wrong, sure the story has been done a ton because it's a solid and engaging tale to learn about a new world/culture. Also the technological portion of the movie used several new methods and cameras for the first time in a theater and introduced so many methods that are in use today.

"Certified door expert" James Cameron

[-] hywoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

What is that other Avatar franchise? I watched the first movie when I was just a kid so my opinions highly influenced by my emotions. I don’t think it is the best sci-fi movie out there but I really like Avatar (2009).

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Avatar the Last Airbender, and the Legend of Korra.

The animation, specifically. The Netflix series is OK, and there is absolutely no movie adaptation.

Funny enough, I watched them when I was like 19, but Korra, Zuko and Iroh are still three of my favorite characters in anything ever. I remember it vividly, where I can't remember a single line from the James Cameron Avatar (which I watched as a teen when it came out).

[-] hywoid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Oh, I thought there is another Avatar (blue one) movie created by somebody else. Avatar animated series are more influential for me too but why compare these totally unrelated works? They have the same name but they are so different that any comparison is absurd to me.

[-] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Thank you for making it clear that there's no movie. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet and some people happen to think that there is one.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

There is no movie in Ba Sing Se.

Here, we are safe. Here, we are free.

this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
300 points (91.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27334 readers
2603 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS