this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
622 points (99.5% liked)

Canada

9789 readers
662 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 103 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Holy shit this is the first peice of news out of alberta I've been happy to see in a hot minute.

Absolutely based

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 94 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not news out of Alberta, it's news out of sturgeon lake Cree nations land..Alberta is just squatting.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] CanadaPlus 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Just to pre-empt where this is going, sure, the Earth was here before all of us. But unlike the Clovis people, First Nations are still here and suffering from what my ancestors did, which is why that leads to misunderstanding when emphasised.

[–] fnord@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sure, but they aren’t the people who were there centuries ago… those people are long dead. And anyway the Cree themselves weren’t the original settlers of Alberta, they expanded westward because of the fur trade and took a lot of land from the Blackfoot, Stoney and Dene people….

The Cree have no more right to the land than anyone else born in Alberta.

[–] CanadaPlus 0 points 1 month ago

I mean, you can state that, but you haven't actually supported it. And that's before you get into the fact our legal system says they do.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not that I advocate it, but another way of writing what you just said is, "This whole treaty thing wouldn't be a problem if we had just gone with full genocide."

[–] CanadaPlus 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I mean, it wouldn't. It's just that genocide is bad, so that's not really preferable, then or now.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When is the last time you heard complaints from the Clovis people?

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

... I was agreeing with you, there would be no treaty disputes.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

NP. Me replying to a rephrasing of my own comment is a bit unusual. I probably should have gone a little more long-form for clarity.

[–] vaccinationviablowdart@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

13000 years ago. You are off topic.