this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
171 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

20337 readers
2032 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 47 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I get the physics one but not the math one

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 55 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The math one uses the fact that 1 + 2 + 3 + ... "=" -1/12, where the equality is in the sense of Ramanujan summation. Classically, the series diverges, so using the equality sign is a bit deceptive. However, in some contexts, it is meaningful to assign a sum to divergent series.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I believe you, but that made about as much sense to me as when Wesley saves the ship by reversing the polarity of the navigational deflector array.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Ahhhh Ramanujan summation. The Forsythe plausabilities but with regards to polynumerstatistical deprecations. Hortense Guildmeier is rolling in his grave!

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 41 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 27 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I am a wordologist, and those are definitely probably words.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I've heard those words! Er, I mean, I've heard words!

[–] cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Feels like a risky click. I'm not sure my worldview can take any more shattering. It's already shattered I tell you. SHATTERED.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 14 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, good. There's a Numberphile video on it linked at the end. That gives me much better odds of understanding this than just reading the article.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Actually, the Numberphile video is notorious for lacking mathematical rigor. Mathologer did a video on it. IMO, it's really really important to explain the difference between what's going on here (assigning a number to a divergent series) and what we ordinarily do (computing the limit of a sequence of partial sums).

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 5 points 3 hours ago

There was a full on mathematical war on YouTube, with numberphile coming back later to show that most partial sum methods also end up at -1/12.

As a science nerd, mathologer basically just took the camp of "old concensus" and gave no other argument than "this is alien math, nope, I don't like it". It just felt like mathologer was Pythagoras fighting against irrational numbers...

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 hours ago

There have been some claims that the numberphile video is very misrepresentative of the underlying math. But I never dug deep enough into it.