this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
365 points (99.5% liked)

Fuck AI

7613 readers
1279 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Speaking during an interview on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street" segment earlier this week, CEO of cybersecurity giant Palo Alto Networks Nikesh Arora implored the tech industry to lower the cost of AI.

During the segment, the chief executive argued that the cost to use large language models (LLMs) has to drop by 20 percent by 2027 — and 90 percent by 2028 — for the tech to be useful to enterprises.

"We need to see the pricing for AI come down," Arora said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

We don't train then on ceo actions. We train them to run a company for the betterment of society, it's people, the employees and its survival.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 29 minutes ago

That requires making decisions, which LLMs can't do. They can only emulate decision-making

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 17 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

You need actual examples of a company working for the betterment of society to train the AI though.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

So use the workers, not the ceo. We 're firing all those bad employees.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

If they were actually firing bad employees then they would start with the executives. The whole AI thing is largely a reflection of what executives think work is, where you just need to prompt your employees better to get better results

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I always think that's the reason of AI overconfidence.

Look at it this way: if AI was my boss, got a lots of things kinda wrong and some things totally wrong, I'd just ignore the bs and do my job the way things actually work.

So from employee perspective, CEOs are easy to replace because they just assign work to be done. Because that's the easy part and if you give wrong instructions, someone with actual intelligence and actual hands would eventually do it right.

Flip the coin, and get someone that knows their stuff and let them assign work to incompetent people and or AI, and what do you get? Slop.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

That's what I said/meant.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 22 hours ago

But if we train them on the average co-op you'll get drama instead :/