this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
323 points (96.3% liked)

Science Memes

17937 readers
3733 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would you become a blind pirate?

I don't get it.

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“I didn’t see anything”

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

OK...
But would it be a problem if I did?

Or are there areas to protect invasive species? I don't think that's a thing?

So, still don't get it.

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the general idea is that you shouldn’t mess with conservation land. The general public isn’t educated enough to know what is invasive and what isn’t, so the rules say don’t disturb stuff. But if someone who was educated was in the park removing invasive species, they are almost certainly “breaking the rules”, but doing a net positive thing.

So if you see it…you didn’t.

[–] cenzorrll@piefed.ca 3 points 12 hours ago

Some of it, at least with plants, is that the invasive species has taken over a niche of the native species. So in removing it, you alter the balance of the ecosystem. Native birds in an area may be at more risk than a native bush due to a loss in habitat, so it's better to leave an invasive bush if it provides that need for the bird

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

ls "conservation land" something special, then?
English Wikipedia seems not to know it, and dictionary translated it to "Landschaftsschutzgebiet" in my language, which is like the most unprotective "protection" category there is.
Basically you could even build a huge tourist ressort or industrial complex in one of those if you know what you are doing...

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m from the states and I took this as “national park” (or perhaps state) land. It’s land intended for ecological conservation.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It could mean anything from private land with an easement to prohibit building on it to a National Park, depending on context and jurisdiction. It's just a non-specific term for "land that is conserved in some way."

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The nomenclature is really messy across countries and even sub-country entities. The Portuguese language Wikipedia even highlights the mess:

Nomenclature diversity across countries. // Some surveys estimate protected areas in different countries and regions are called by at least a hundred names, and not uncommonly countries have their own categories of protected spaces, roughly similar to the protected space concept defined by the IUCN.

From that I guess the restrictions associated with those spaces also change, and in some you aren't supposed to remove local fauna and/or flora, creating situations like in the meme (removing invasive species is against the letter of the rule, but within the spirit).

[–] Coldmoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Try using context clues for a brief second

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I am assuming "conservation areas" in this sense means native/indigenous lands

edit: Whoops I am wrong. Ecological conservation then. I thought invasive species were bad for those?

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You are probably confusing it with "reservation".

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

idk I was just guessing. I don't see how the joke with ecological conservation (since getting rid of invasive species is good, right?)

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Usually, on land that is intended to be preserved, they don't want random people hacking away at vegetation, so they will have rules about it. If a park ranger or someone like that sees you cutting down trees or whatever, you are probably going to get yelled at or fined or something.

It's also highly dependent on species and location. Some invasive species will basically multiply if you try to tear them out, either resprouting vegetatively, or through seed spread. Species like tree-of-heaven or paulonia also become huge trees, so they probably don't want you cutting those down.

Some places like Oahu are basically 95% invasive species, so if you remove that, you have nothing left. Oahu is basically all guava and mesquite trees, and without that, the soil washes away, and there's no hope of recovery, so invasive management needs to be done in consultation with experts.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Same here.
Meme is imho somewhat crappy and certainly to un-scientific to be under "science memes".

[–] Envy@quokk.au 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Its okay that you don't understand something buddy you can stop pretending and doubling down. I thought germans were smarter than us Americans, learn something new every day!

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 11 points 1 day ago

Cuz you ain't seen shit.