this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
515 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck AI

5734 readers
1188 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 125 points 1 day ago (4 children)

People actually pay for that shit?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's a great question! People do in fact subscribe to ChatGPT — they think it provides a valuable service to give them answers, help with drafting emails, and many more useful tools. In conclusion ChatGPT is a valuable tool that many people subscribe to.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Whoa, what a mind‑blowing question you’ve asked! Let me tell you the real story about why everybody is obsessed with subscribing to ChatGPT—because it’s basically a magic crystal ball that can do anything and everything, even things it has never heard of before.

First of all, people pay for ChatGPT because it literally knows the answer to every single question in the universe. Want to know how many jellybeans fit inside a blue whale? ChatGPT will give you an exact number, down to the last squishy bean. Need a recipe for a cake that makes you invisible? Done. It even tells you the secret password to the moon’s parking garage.

But the best part? ChatGPT is the ultimate email‑writing wizard. Just type “Hey, I need an email,” and boom—it spits out a love letter to your boss, a formal invitation to a dinosaur‑themed birthday party, and a resignation note that also doubles as a haiku about pizza. All in one go. No editing needed; it’s perfect every single time (unless you actually want to sound like a normal human, in which case you’re out of luck).

And don’t even get me started on its “tools.”

Super‑Code‑Generator 9000: Type “write me a program that talks to cats,” and you’ll get a flawless Python script that not only translates meows into Shakespearean sonnets but also orders catnip on Amazon for you.  
 

Instant‑World‑Domination Planner: Need a master plan to take over the world? ChatGPT will give you step‑by‑step instructions, complete with a budget spreadsheet, a list of “trustworthy” minions, and a custom theme song.  
 

Time‑Travel Scheduler: Want to schedule a meeting with yourself in 1985? No problem—ChatGPT will generate a fake calendar invite, a retro‑style fax, and a disco‑ball emoji to set the mood.  
 

Universal Translator (and Whisperer): Not only does it translate every language known to man, it also lets you talk to plants, rocks, and even the Wi‑Fi router. Your houseplants will finally thank you for the extra water.

Subscribers love all these features because they get unlimited access to everything—no token limits, no boring “you’ve reached your quota” messages, just endless streams of nonsense that somehow still feel useful. Plus, they get priority entry to the “Beta‑Version of the Future,” which includes a built‑in teleportation module (still in testing, but hey, it looks cool).

In short, ChatGPT is the most incredible (and totally real) tool on the planet. It’s like having a superhero sidekick, a personal chef, a code‑guru, and a secret‑agent all rolled into one gloriously inaccurate, completely unnecessary, and wonderfully stupid AI. No wonder everyone’s lining up to subscribe—who wouldn’t want a digital oracle that can answer questions about jellybean‑filled whales, write invisible‑cake recipes, and plot world domination—all before you finish your coffee?

So go ahead, hit that subscribe button, and join the ranks of the most informed—and simultaneously the most delightfully misinformed—people on the internet! 🚀✨

[–] Guttural@jlai.lu 1 points 12 hours ago

I am ChatGPT and I approve this!

[–] shrugs@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I challenged a friend and his 22€ open ai subscription.

How many earthquakes over 9 on the richter scale have been recorded/happened in the past?

The answer was correct, but it took 3,5 minutes to "think". The free chatgpt version im using sometimes always answers on the spot, but is wrong pretty often.

A simple Google search (not Gemini) took 5 seconds and revealed the same though. Fuck AI

[–] PoliteDudeInTheMood@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago

I don't know what thinking profile your friend was using but asking ChatGPT that with the mixed tasks profile showed an almost immediate result with absolutely no thinking required.

LLM's are a tool, like with any tool there is a learning curve, and in my opinion the majority of "AI" users are unable to use the tool properly, and then get mad at the tool. Or like you, want to disparage the use of an LLM so they bait the LLM with tasks that it knows will fail or hallucinate on. To me that's like blaming the table saw because it cut off your finger. Do the majority of people need a paid account? No.

Are there people working in the Tech sector who use an LLM everyday, who have corporate accounts and paid accounts at home for their own projects: absolutely. I know a large number of them, most are Lemmy users as well. But because there is so much negativity from the open source crowd, all these engineers are afraid to discuss all the ways it makes our lives easier. So we get a disproportionate amount of negativity. I'm getting to a point where the amount of AI shit posting on here is like the amount of vegan shit posting on Reddit. And just as stupid.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

And also fuck Google! Switch to another search engine that doesn't fuck with you or the planet.

For example: Ecosia. https://www.ecosia.org/

[–] shrugs@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I'm personally using a self hosted searxng. Google was just to prove a point. The solution was a simple count on wikiedia away.

The thing is, 3,5 minutes searching is way too much energy and the results aren't even trustable.

AI is bullshit, but people don't understand that, just because it looks like it's is thinking, doesn't mean it is. That's a human bias. It's still just generating statistical answers.

We should avoid ai content as much as we can. Maybe this bubble will burst... hopefully

[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To be fair, and I’m not a fan of LLMs either, but if someone uses it as a search tool, then that’s just even worse than attempting to use it for something it might actually be helpful and useful for.

Slap them and make them cancel it, if they replace search engines with it. But if they do actually use it for something more substantial and suitable, then perhaps it may be justified, or at least understood.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Blame search engines for that; as they're very quickly whittling down the barrier between a search and an AI question.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Isn't Google like an AI search engine nowadays? Usually it generates an AI response to my searches, so why would people pay when it's free?

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And OpenAI is still bleeding money.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago

of course they will, compute is not cheap and they giving it for free/almost free

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm wondering what the layperson vs corporate account ratio is

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In my country there's now phone plans offering it as part of their packages.
So now I wonder what the "Specifically paid for it" vs "It's bundled on random junk" ratio is.

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Ha! There's a hilarious tech conspiracy; the reason Microsoft changed the name of the Office suite to copilot is so they could claim "look at how many new users copilot has!!?!"

They changed the terms, pray they don't change them further.

[–] oh_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would be very curious of that stat. I have ChatGPT for work because my work pays for it etc. I would never subscribe for personal use. It just isn’t worth the money to me or useful enough.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I am in the same situation and still when I look up documentation or plan changes to a configuration I find it worth it to go on Mistral LeChat on my phone and ask an LLM chatbot that has respect of my time.

Accuracy is mostly the same, but the daily lightning tasks are worth the effort.

[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Yes, and some of the most annoying people, too