this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
381 points (97.5% liked)

Canada

11574 readers
1000 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7671573

Sweden knew Canada's Marc Kennedy was a notorious cheater.

So they set up a camera at the 'hog line' to record it.

And caught him doing it at the Olympics.

tweto

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

ok, but we are talking about a sport that is using brooms to micro melt the ice, and on a molecular level changing how the rotation changes the direction of this rock… someone touching the rock seems much more impactful

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Fair enough. I realize now that I spoke with more confidence on the reality of the situation than I intended. Any avid curler I've spoken with regarding this in the last couple days swears up and down that the level of interaction that supposidly occurred between the curler and the rock is genuinely a non-factor. I do not know from any level of personal experience, hence why I stated that I trust whatever Olympic panel exists. I merely wanted to counter the poor argument that "the rule wouldn't exist if it can't impact the rock," as the rule can absolutely exist for the purpose of more clear cut cases.

Armchair analysis is rarely worth taking seriously. I suspect that neither of us actually know from experience, but maybe you're a professional curler.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Like in baseball there is a rule that the bat can't have more pine tar on it than the width of home plate. It was put in teh rules in 1901 or something, no one has any idea why and the fact they once overruled the results of a MLB game related to it is astonishing.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

Fair enough. I realize now that I spoke with more confidence on the reality of the situation than I intended.

That is a refreshing statement to read. A person after the truth disregards his own personal feelings and allows for possible reconsiderations. Let's make this the 2026 thing to do! All the best.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 21 hours ago

It really isn't. Those rocks are heavy, a light touch like what's seen in the video would have very little impact.

Changing the friction of the ice on the other hand has significantly more impact because of how heavy the rock is.