Investigators in the U.S. and Canada have cautioned that it is too early to determine a cause and that several safeguards would have had to fail for a disaster of this magnitude to occur.

In aviation safety, this is known as the Swiss Cheese Model, which compares the holes in stacked slices of cheese to weaknesses in different layers of safety defences. The holes rarely all line up. But when they do, an error can pass through.

One of the errors now drawing concern from Canadian aviation safety experts is runway incursions, like the one leading up to the collision at LaGuardia.

In 2010, the year the TSB added runway incursions to its watchlist, Nav Canada recorded 334 of them. In its 2025 financial year, Nav Canada recorded 612 runway incursions at Canadian airports between Sept. 1 and Aug. 31, according to data provided to CBC News.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

I had an even simpler idea, why if there was not just some kind of automated signage on the taxiways into runways that signalled if a plane was imminently landing, like, iunno, some kind of red light?

[–] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 5 points 7 hours ago

Pssh... next you'll be suggesting mandatory training that specifies checking both ways before crossing.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

AFAIK ground vehicles are supposed to stop and ask for clearance before crossing runways already. In this case the ATC granted permission to cross.

Plus adding the transponder mean the truck will also show up in the aircraft’s ADS-B system so they’re not relying solely on ATC for that info.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 1 points 6 hours ago

Right but a “hey there’s a fucking plane landing on this runway” light at least adds another guard on top of the human element