638
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Northern Virginia county acknowledged it underreported President Joe Biden's margin of victory over Donald Trump there in the 2020 presidential election by about 4,000 votes, the first detailed accounting of errors that came to light in 2022 as part of a criminal case.

The admission Thursday from the Prince William County Office of Elections comes a week after prosecutors from the Virginia Attorney General's office dropped charges against the county's former registrar, Michele White.

Counts were also off in races for the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives, though by lesser margins.

In a statement, the county's current registrar, Eric Olsen, emphasized that the mistakes did not come close to affecting the outcome of any race and “did not consistently favor one party or candidate but were likely due to a lack of proper planning, a difficult election environment, and human error.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 205 points 7 months ago

Hey y’all remember that time Katharine Harris purged 120,000 mostly-black voters from the records just prior to the FL 2000 pesidential election that Al Gore won but got denied by Katharine Harris and a conservative SCOTUS? Member that?

Aw man and then we had 9/11 and Iraq II, the Sanctity of Marriage Act and the financial system collapse?

And she bought the voter list from Texas! Which. Huh.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 62 points 7 months ago

Remember how a bunch of Republican staffers rioted and tried to intimidate the vote counters in Florida? (The "Brooks Brothers riot".) Remember when the Supreme Court halted the vote count and declared Bush has won? Remember how the eventual full count of the votes showed Gore won by all metrics?

I fucking remember that.

[-] msbellows@c.im 18 points 7 months ago

@winterayars @homesweethomeMrL And Roger Stone was behind that.

Fucker.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 27 points 7 months ago

That's on my "If I ever get access to time travel, go visit these people" list.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 13 points 7 months ago

I’ve thought a lot about how a Gore presidency could have panned out for the US vs what ended up happening instead.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 70 points 7 months ago

This needs to be thoroughly investigated. If it was a fuckup, fine. If someone did some bullshit, fucking prosecute.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 35 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] aew360@lemm.ee 55 points 7 months ago

Wait, there’s more than just a headline and a summary? This changes everything

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago

No hunny, it was just a bad dream. But you're awake and safe now, there's no such things as "articles", just headlines.

[-] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Unfortunately, it will not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 65 points 7 months ago

So the election officials in that state are all going to federal prison right?

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

We're gonna SLAM them, and they will be officially ON N O T I C E

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Can someone tell me please why we allow each State to set up its own set of rules/procedures for how federally elected positions are voted on and counted?

Edit: thank you all for the education. I had actually meant my comment more rhetorically than literally (I'm aware of how the Constitution works, etc.), to spur discussion about changing it, but glad that there was some good educational information in the the replies.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago

Getting the Constitution passed was a monumental challenge. The US under the Articles of Confederation wasn't really a country as we'd see it today. It was more like the European Union than a unified nation.

Adopting the Constitution required 13 independent nations to give up their sovereignty to a federal government. Part of the negotiations was letting states keep certain powers - among them how they would select the President. That's the biggest there's an electoral college - each state is given votes according to their population, but the states themselves select the voters.

The Constitution doesn't even require that there be a popular election for the President. All 50 states currently choose their electors through a popular vote, but that's absolutely not a federal requirement.

One of the scariest things the GOP is trying to do is getting the state legislatures in GOP-controlled states to pass emergency laws if Trump loses in their state to change how their electors are assigned after the election - and in Bush v Gore the Court hinted that that might be perfectly legal.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago

Because the founding fathers had to make a lot of concessions to the already existing states that were not thrilled to give up their power and rights?

States literally don't even have to have elections. If they pass a law that the their electoral votes will be given to a winner of a raffle or a quiz show, they can do that according to the US constitution.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

#Article 2, Section 1:

"The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector."

Now, it could be easy to read that one way, but the Independent State Legislature theory was rejected by the SCOTUS as recently as 2023.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Did not know SCOTUS ruled on it. Thanks.

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Article IV, section 4 : "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence." [~https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIV-S4-1/ALDE_00013635]

The 'guarantee clause' was both a promise that the federal government would help suppress state-level insurrections and protect member states from foreign attack, and a requirement that in order to be a member state, you had to have a government in the form of a republic (i.e., no monarchy-states, no dictatorships). This can be read to mean that democracy of some sort is required, as republics implicitly derive their public authority from the people living in them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago

So there was election fraud - committed by republicans. Orange man was right, he was just wrong about the party committing the fraud.

[-] betheydocrime@lemmy.world 47 points 7 months ago

Did you read the article?

In a statement, the county's current registrar, Eric Olsen, emphasized that the mistakes did not come close to affecting the outcome of any race and “did not consistently favor one party or candidate but were likely due to a lack of proper planning, a difficult election environment, and human error.”

In a phone interview, Olsen said the majority of errors occurred in so-called “split precincts,” in which one precinct is home to two different congressional districts. The county's voting system did not split the presidential vote by congressional district. The state system required them to be split that way. The errors occurred trying to conform the county data with the state requirements, he said.

Other mistakes highlighted faults in the county's validation process. For example, Olsen said he first discovered the mistakes when he noticed that Precincts 607 and 608 displayed identical presidential votes. Someone had entered one precinct's data into the other by mistake.

“It seemed like an obvious typo,” said Olsen, who replaced White as registrar and eventually reported the irregularities under his predecessor to state officials.

Fraud requires intent, and it seems like there was no intent here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

4000 isn’t an insignificant sum

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Turns out there was election fraud after all. Performed by the very ones who claim(ed) the election was rigged.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Pedophilia, election hijinks, organized crime: Every wild accusation they make seems to be a confession.

[-] sab@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"Turns out"?! Trump was literally recorded calling around threatening people not to count votes. The effort to rig the election was made entirely in the open, the Republicans were basically talking about it on Fox News.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"Turns out"?!

Relax, it's a figure a speech champ. It's called being facetious.

[-] sab@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, sorry, didn't mean to come across as aggressive or dismissive of your point. Reading it back I realize "?!" comes across as a bit much.

I'm just a bit tired that every time we learn in some new way that the Republican party consists of a bunch of authoritarians we're supposed to act as if we just learned something new.

[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I mean, it is given that Biden won this county be more than 60,000 votes already, and Virginia by 450,000.

[-] menthol@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Ok, but what if it was Georgia where Biden won by 12,000 votes? What if 3 counties in Georgia had the 4,000 vote error margin and flipped the state?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

Tr*mp (probably): "Total vindication! They did the election fraud in Virgina and now everyone knows it! This was the most corrupt, most frauded election in the history of Americ- what? they were more votes for Biden? Never mind."

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 10 points 7 months ago

It all tracks except the never mind part. You know they will use this, despite that it was them cheating.

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

It was nobody cheating.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

In the presidential race, the county mistakenly shorted Biden by 1,648 votes, and overreported Trump's count by 2,327 votes. The 3,975-vote error in the margin of victory was immaterial in a contest that Biden won by 450,000 votes in Virginia and by more than 60,000 votes in Prince William County.

Y’know I can’t find Michele White’s party affiliation anywhere. Anyone know?

From: this article (yeah washington times i know, sorry, its one w/o paywall):

The most serious charges against White had already been dismissed. The Virginia Attorney General’s Office said it was forced to drop felony charges of corrupt conduct and making a false statement because a key witness had revised their testimony.

. . . In White’s case, prosecutors insinuated that the case fell apart because a witness in the county’s elections office “conveniently” changed their testimony to the detriment of the government’s case.

At Monday’s hearing, Judge Carroll Weimer asked if the government was implying that there were “shenanigans” that caused the government’s case to collapse. Herring maintained that he considered some of the witnesses’ revisions to their testimony “convenient” but said that he had no reason to believe that White was responsible for those revisions.

Uh huh.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 19 points 7 months ago

Virginia has scanned physical ballots. There is no possible way the count was 4000 votes off without foul play. Audits in the state routinely report zero percent error rates between hand counts and machine counts.

It's actually quite notable that they dropped these charges. Youngkin is clearly trying to protect someone or something from sunlight here.

[-] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Hanlon's razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago
[-] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

Maliciously stupid? Or stupidly malicious?

[-] mundane@feddit.nu 3 points 7 months ago
[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 3 points 7 months ago

To the tune of Lucky Charms jingle

They're stupidly malicious!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rusticus@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

Stop the steal! /s

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
638 points (97.9% liked)

News

22488 readers
4345 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS