785
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 291 points 11 months ago

If Trump loses the 2024 election because Texas temporarily secedes, taking its 38 Republican electoral votes with it, I might die from the schadenfreude.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 179 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

1.Just give Texas back to Mexico.

2.Reverse UNO

3.White Republicans are now the immigrants on the wrong side of the border

4.Enjoy some queso

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 105 points 11 months ago

Mexico 2 days later: Amigo, please take these fuck faces back

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 42 points 11 months ago

Tesla becoming a mexican business lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

I haven't had an orgasm since 2017, but I think that would do it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 244 points 11 months ago

the nihilist in me really wants to see texas attempt this.

confederates === domestic terrorists. lets act accordingly.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

the nihilist in me really wants to see texas attempt this.

Just to get rid of Abbot and Cruz it would be worth it.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ah ha, I found a JS dev lmfao

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 172 points 11 months ago

Can we just acknowledge that this is unhinged? Biden has the strongest border policies ever implemented by a Democrat. This just shows that there is no compromise possible with these traitors. They will never admit you made a step in their direction, only demand more and more and more until you're just doing their bidding.

This is truly the way of extremists and terrorists, they demand the country be run to their preferences, democratic systems be damned.

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It really is sad to see so many Americans captivated by misinformation that they've convinced themselves is real. Abandoning science, reason, discussion, compromise, even tolerance. I try to keep my bloodthirst in check but after years upon years of them growing like a cancer, forming cult-like militia, becoming full blown domestic terrorists threatening high treason, it can't be tolerated any further. It was cute when it was just posturing, symbolizing they were unhappy with the system at large and wanted to fuck with it a little.

Now it's spiraled out of control. Now the punishment for treason should be felt. Either mercifully with the arrest of Abbott or vengefully with the GOP Texans being buried under the new courthouse.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MrPibb@lemmynsfw.com 114 points 11 months ago

I have yet to see this mentioned in any of these threads, at least the ones that I have read. If Texas secedes or tries to, Republicans lose 38 seats in the House of Representatives and two Senate seats. This give the House to Democrats for the foreseeable future and Democrats an easier path to passing bills in the Senate. Not that Texas, Abbott, cares.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 40 points 11 months ago

not to mention then they'll be a country with oil within peacekeepin' distance of the USA

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Here's hoping a congressman disappears him.

But seriously, there needs to be a mechanism for the feds to impeach a governor.

[-] noride@lemm.ee 34 points 11 months ago

They have one now but it's messy and stains the carpet.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 105 points 11 months ago

Brexit was so successful, it's now time for Texit!

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

Stop threatening the rest of us with a good time

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 104 points 11 months ago

cut off all federal funding

let then secede

invade and retake them as a territory with no federal voting rights

make dc and puerto rico states

republicans never win again

[-] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 37 points 11 months ago

Please stop I can only get so erect

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 31 points 11 months ago

Naw, split up the state into 4 states, with Houston, Austin, Dallas and San Antonio as capitals. Cut state lines and populations up to ensure that as the main city votes so goes the state.

That'd be 8 democratic senators.

Add DC, PR, American Virgin Islands American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and that's potentially another 12.

Regardless of politics the territories, and DC, should have statehood and equal rights and representation as the rest of us or they should have independence. It's part of our national identity. No more colonialism or secondclass sub citizens.

[-] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 77 points 11 months ago

These dumb fucks can't go a single winter or summer without their power grids going down and then begging for free money and help but they somehow thing they can be their own country? Fuck it, let em try and then they will find out that the Mexican cartels don't fuck around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 76 points 11 months ago

This Texan checked into it, and unfortunately we have no procedure for recalling our treasonous governor. At a minimum, he should be held in contempt of court and jailed. I would like to see a treason indictment.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 11 months ago

just break the elevator in the state house

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 66 points 11 months ago

The only issue I have with secession talk is there are lots of Texas citizens who aren't the problem. Every red state has people with common sense, they just don't have the ability at the moment to shut up the idiots. Plus secession at this point is ludicrous, leaving with your toys isn't how you fix problems. Oh wait, it's Republicans, they don't ever have solutions anymore anyway it's all a political game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago

As a city Texan who lives in one of the most military-friendly and full cities in the state, I say I’d like to see you try greggy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago

I don’t think Republican leadership is going to like losing 40 electoral votes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago

GM: "Well, you can certainly try."

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago
[-] Laughbone@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago

How do 1%ers hear this and not immediately pull campaign funding, what would a civil war do to the US economy. When a nation with the most guns in the world has people starving what do they think is gonna happen. I guess they are counting on being kings in the aftermath or that Jesus will come back or something.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

See, your problem is you assume the 1% are intelligent. They are not. The attribute they have the most of is greed. Greed can blind even the intelligent, and most of them aren't even playing with a full deck.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 51 points 11 months ago

Do it, you chicken shit piss baby

[-] mo_lave@reddthat.com 48 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Obviously he'll flip into "federal authority is absolute" against states like California if a Republican (read: Trump) is president.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 45 points 11 months ago

So what about Texas invading other states by bussing migrants there?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

if they secede we'll have to update all the flags. what a pain. maybe we could just add in puerto rico really quick

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] bambam@piefed.social 35 points 11 months ago

Abbott is unfit to hold office.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 32 points 11 months ago

If it means Ted Cruz will be forced to fuck off, don’t keep us waiting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] donuts@kbin.social 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If Texas has complete control and final authority over their majority portion of the southern border, shouldn't they be the ones are responsible for spending the resources for securing it as well as being accountable for the humanitarian disaster?

The Republicans want it both ways: They want to blame the President and federal government for the situation at the border (but only when it's the Democrats in office and never when they are, of course), and at the exact same time they want to claim total authority over border policy on the state level. On top of that, they love to pull political stunts wrt the border every election year, but when it comes to actually passing an immigration bill, they'll tank it because Trump doesn't want to let Biden have yet another win.

Talk about having your cake and eating it too. Fucking pick one you disingenuous scumbag clowns.

[-] DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social 31 points 11 months ago

This walking corpse needs to be slapped back to reality. Secession talk should get you fucked into the ground.

Traitor scum.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Hmmm... 🤔

"states have a right of self-defense, under Article 4, Section 4 and Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution."

https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/full-text

Article 4, Section 4:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

I don't see a) anything there that defines "invasion" or b) grants the states the power to act if the United States chooses not to.

Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3:

"Section 10: Powers Denied to the States

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."

Again, "invaded".

It's pretty clear from section 10, since it's also speaking of troops, ships of war, and engaging in war that it means MILITARY invasion, not an influx of citizen refugees.

Dictionaries at the time back up that reading:

https://mises.org/wire/what-did-founders-mean-invasion

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

For a party that claims to love and respect the US Constitution, being filled to gills with "constitutional orginalists," I don't think any Republican has ever actually read the document. If they had even glanced over it, they would have looked at Article 6, Paragraph 2 also known as the "Federal Supremacy Clause." It's meaning is that law at the Federal level supercedes State laws and even state constitutions. The "Founding Fathers" intended for the Federal government to hold supremacy over the state governments... now it isn't written in plain English, but it is plain enough. Further, the end of our Civil War the court case Texas v White made it plain as day legally that no State may leave the union. Again, the party of "law and order" comes in clutch with that misunderstanding of what those words mean.

All that being said, succession isn't actually that popular (even in Texas). There would likely be a mass revolt against it in any state attempting it. Further, even a play at attempting it would be a political death sentence (as well as, perhaps, a literal one). Any insurrection against the federal government, even by a collection of contiguous states, would face a similar challenge the capitalists/monarchists (or Whites) of the Russian Civil War faced. The major population centers wouldn't recognize the authority of those in revolt and all they'd be left with would be the hinterlands and rural towns. Which is not a great position to be in strategically (again, see: the outcome of the Russian Civil War).

This is all not to mention, while States have their own National Guards, the insurrectionists would have to convince those troops to fire on troops who are wearing the same uniform. You'd have to convince their officers to break their oath to uphold both US law and face a possible death sentence if captured. I don't know Abbott's relationship with his National Guardsmen, but I highly doubt many officers will go in with him in this piece of political theater.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

He is wrong. But also imagine what that looks like. You think people in the UK regret brexit? Hahaha I hope Texas can grow all their own food.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 30 points 11 months ago

Biden should call them the fuck out. Immediately withdraw all federal funding, including anything paid for by the government like power plants and highways. Let them suffer until they're willing to play nice with the rest of us.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

Abbott is so full of shit. Texas isn’t succeeding from anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Someone should tell these guys it's not 1861 anymore. They might find themselves on the business end of a hellfire missile if they keep running their yaps with impunity or take actionable steps towards actually seceding. Also known in modern vernacular as "Fuck around and find out".

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

The great Texas economy won't fair to well when trade tariffs kick in and they stop benefiting from all the trade deals the US has.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
785 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1686 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS