545
It's in their own self interest to water down the sex offenders list.
And reduce the number of competent educators
This is in Missouri, for anyone wondering.
one of the poorest states in the country, lowest IQs, most health issues, you'd think they'd have more important things to discuss..
They do, which is why distraction is so important.
That would imply that care about fixing problems. They don't; they want to create problems.
It's so bad I generally refuse to identify being from there. When anyone asks I just say I live in misery, with swaths of lead addled lunatics. Some think it's quaint, others understand.
Being from (and stuck in) Oklahoma, I understand and I feel for you.
Born (but thankfully not raised) in the 1 star state, hate any time I need to bring out my birth certificate.
They seem to be leaning in to the fact the states name sounds like "misery".
For now, get out and vote if you're reading this.
Oooooh the Missouri~
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why do I get the feeling that the goal of this is more to dilute the meaning of the term sex offender, than it is anything else.
Weird how the party of sex offenders wants to ruin any meaning to the term sex offender.
Weird how the party of sex offenders wants to ruin any meaning to the term sex offender.
The same applies to impeachment.
Which is why they were balls deep on russian cock and swallowing those thick and juicy lies, Until they found out the dick was from baddragon and the lies were a not-for-ingestion lotion.
Desperate to have any (imaginary) justification for the impeachment.
Well this is where it's headed. First it will be teachers, parents, doctors, therapists.
Then they'll want to register trans adults as sex offenders. Then all LGBTQ people.
Like so much of the government in the US, the infrastructure is there, ready to be abused. Change one line and it applies to all of us.
Anyone not realize just how awful it would be to get labeled a sex offender? It makes it almost impossible to find a place to live, or a job. People will seek you out and harass you in public. This is an extremely serious classification that shouldn't have anything to do with "culture wars". It should be reserved only for the worst classes of convicted criminals -- if it's not actually cruel and unusual and unnecessarily punative.
First they came for the trans folk...just like the Nazis.
We should riot
Republicans are an existential threat. Removing them from power is self defense.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The party of gross, old sex-offenders really seem to want to water down the meaning of the list many of them are/should be on.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That won't make the sex offender registry functionally useless at all... /s
If you ever needed an example of how conservatives don't actually give a shit about preventing child predation...
You mean the conservatives constantly being caught being sex offenders and child predators?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Protect The Kids by Jailing Teachers who Protect The Kids! Also let's roll back Child Labor Laws!
They’re trying.
Yeah, the GOP hated the Taliban and China so much they adopted their ideology. Truly their only problem with other countries is the color of their skin.
Or the resources within their borders
Holyshit aren’t you guys very big on whatever the amendment that guarantees you free speech ? How’s this not a blatant violation of free speech ?
It is, this is ridiculous GOP headline-grabbing outrage bait but we live in stupid universe so I can't say with absolute certainty that it won't happen.
The point is to lose, so they can stoke some culture war bullshit about how free speech is dead, the government is too big, the judiciary is too woke, etc. And if it's allowed to stand, all the better.
This is an exercise in trying to build outrage before the elections, because they don't have an actual platform that involves making people's lives better.
Well they are very good in getting me triggered even though I’m 12000 km away and not concerned by those shenanigans. It’s soooo infuriating.
6-3
load more comments
(2 replies)
I cannot imagine being this twisted and spiteful to think this is a good idea.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's a crime? How? This is the dumbest legislation ever.
I hope Missouri taxpayers like their state government spending their hard earned tax dollars on lawsuits for blatantly unconstitutional laws. Who needs infrastructure, or literally anything tangible when you can just spend more money on losing? Absolutely pathetic.
Sadly, far too many around us are. If it wasn't for family etc I'd definitely have no reason to be here over anywhere else. But I enjoy giving the GOP here hell and being some added voice for those with less options.
By “support”, do they mean treating them like human beings instead of mocking and deriding them?
Unironically, yes.
The GOP are vile human beings.
Every accusation is a confession.
Never vote GOP, ever again.
Never neglect to vote against them.
This is much more useful advice.
Fuck sakes, they just want to reinforce a fucking century old false trope.
Ooh ooh let's apply this to Sunday schools
Projection again. All GOP members are sex offenders.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
545 points (98.7% liked)
politics
18129 readers
3539 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS