67
submitted 4 days ago by yoz@aussie.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I would suspect never.

Either they are obsessed with their "work" and do it far more than that, or they do nothing.

[-] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 28 points 3 days ago

And you're asking people in lemmy this?

It's like asking your highschool friends if models make good money

[-] yoz@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago
[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Financial advisors for the Uber rich. I remember hearing an interview of one on..radio lab or this American life or.. Something...I can't remember it was years ago, but anyway she described what it was like. They don't use passports, they would call her to find bracelets they lost in taxis, it didn't sound like they were working at all. I don't remember if she went into their work schedule, but financial advisors are treated like baby sitters, or at least she was.

I thought that might be a good place to start, I'm sure some of them have written books about it, or done more interviews.

[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 161 points 4 days ago

Nobody becomes billionaire by working. You become a billionaire by exploiting others work.

[-] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Exactly..

Edit: I'm not saying they didn't work but there is a limit of money someone can make working by themself, so at some point they start to delegate stuff to make more money, so yeah at the end start exploiting someone else to make more money.

[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Notch is a billionaire. He made Minecraft as a solo project, it became what it was, then he sold it to Microsoft.

Not saying that most billionaires didn't get there via exploitation, but I don't think it's a strict prerequisite.

[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 21 points 4 days ago

Notch initially developed Minecraft by himself when he started the project in May 2009. However, as the game gained popularity, he founded the company Mojang in 2010 and brought on additional developers to help improve and expand the game. By the time he sold Mojang and Minecraft to Microsoft in 2014, it was a collaborative effort with a team of developers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

The argument is usually there’s no ethical consumption under capitalism. As in every part of the system is exploitative. The computer he used to program exploited workers and natural resources. The clothing he wore made in sweatshops. All the food made by exploiting animals, etc.

Therefore those with the most money must’ve cumulatively exploited more than others regardless of how they made the money because the exploitation is unavoidable.

[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Sure, but that argument is specious as hell, right? Like, if everyone in the United States decided to give you a $5 bill, does that instantly make you a bad person who exploited labor to get where you are?

"There is no ethical consumption under capitalism" is simply a rhetorical device to outline the flaws in the system. It completely breaks down when used as justification to villainize someone.

Your position could be equally stated as, "anyone who has more money than me is a worse person than me, and anyone with less money than me is a better person than me." It's a misuse of the "no ethical consumption" idea on its face.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 4 days ago

Exploitation is a loaded term, with many negative connotations. It's more neutral to state the same thing as, "Nobody gets to be a billionaire without accruing the surplus value of other people's labor."

And that's true of Notch, too. Minecraft wouldn't exist without countless people who built the computers, the OS, the Java language, built out the Internet, operate the electrical grid, operate the payment networks, litigated and legislated copyright law, et cetera.

Now, you might say that all of those people got compensated for their labor, and it's true. (That's why the negative connotations of exploitation don't apply.) However, the result of their labor unlocks immense value, which they do not share in because of the way the Internet developed. We could easily imagine a different scenario in which the online services won, an alternate reality in which Notch worked as a programmer for PepsiCo-Prodigy-AOL, and got paid a very good salary to create Minecraft for it. Then, it would be fair for the company to reap all of the subscription fees generated by putting the game on their network service.

We can say that in both scenarios, as long as we're imagining, Notch would have put in the same amount of work. In one, though, he'd live a decent, middle-class life, with a corporation reaping the surplus value of his labor. In our world, he's a billionaire, benefiting from the surplus value of others' labor.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago
[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 38 points 4 days ago

Welcome to a day in the life of a billionaire. You'll need to get up nice and early for a personalised yoga routine devised by your trainer, and then it's straight out of the house to work. You've got breakfast scheduled with a CEO, and you're going to spend an hour objectifying women with him before heading into the office. Quick hello, report from your executive team, and now it's time for a power brunch with the man who sources child slaves for you to have sex with. Private jet flight to the next city over for lunch, you have a corrupt mayor to bribe so the minimum wage won't go up. Then it's time to fly back and spend an hour in your office looking important. You ended up sleeping with your secretary instead of getting anything done, but hey, we can't all be faithful to our wives. Now that it's 2pm, you've got to go play golf with your "professional contacts". You refer to your caddy with a racial slur. At 4pm, you go back to the office for the last time today, where your son is waiting for you. It's very hard educating a young man on how to inherit a fortune 500 company that runs itself. You spend most of the next hour telling him about golf. At 5pm, finally get in your limousine to go home. You've been working all day, and you're beat. You praise yourself for your work ethic, and wonder if the single day you work next week is going to be as hard.

[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

At which part of the day do you sit around and shitpost alt right propaganda on Twitter for hours?

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

You write all of that in the middle of the night to distract yourself from the guilt which robs you of your sleep, before your heavy medication kicks in. You give it to your social media staff in the morning to post throughout the day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 76 points 4 days ago

Definitely not 9-5, M-F. Most billionaires inherited substantial wealth to begin with. But executives, in general, don’t have “hours” in the same way as rank and file workers. It’s more about knowledge and meetings — well, hopefully knowledge — so you might have an 11am meeting, a 2pm call, and then a 7pm dinner with a potential investor or whatever. You don’t really “work” in between those obligations unless it’s a small company (where you probably aren’t a billionaire anyway). At most, you need to make a board report or PowerPoint for a presentation or something like that.

Billionaires who just own things and aren’t in the C-suite don’t work much at all. Even if you’re on some boards, it’s not much in terms of actual obligations. There’s definitely tasks to do but it’s also definitely not a job. So, a bit like being a landlord.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Just to add, they pay someone to make the board report or PowerPoint presentation for them.

[-] DigDoug@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Just look at the industrial amounts of bullshit spewing from Elon Musk's Twitter feed.

Clearly the answer is no.

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago

I feel people still don't understand how much a billion is. One Million dollars would still be life changing for most people here, but consider that 1 million seconds ago was 11 days ago, 1 Billion seconds ago was 31 years ago.

To put it in another perspective, a very bad investment would yield you 0.1% monthly. This means that if a billionaire was to invest money the worst way possible, he would have to spend over 1 Million dollars per month to ever decrease his fortune.

If you had an infinite money machine, that as long as you don't spend more than a million per month it just keeps on growing, would you ever work? Yeah, thought so, billionaires are the same, they might have hobbies, and those hobbies might be something others consider work, but they're not working.

I personally believe that if a person ever gets 1 Billion dollars he should receive a letter congratulating them for winning capitalism, and informing them that any cent above 1 Billion will be taxed at 99.9999% (including investments).

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

I've always liked the saying "The difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars is about a billion dollars" to really drive it home.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] ReeSilva@bolha.forum 31 points 4 days ago

they don't work, they are the real bums doing nothing all day, living with the profits of OUR (the working class) hard work.

They don't work and are the reason why the workers don't have a good life.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 61 points 4 days ago

No they do not. But they do emit about 1 million times more CO2 than the average person

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 35 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's not work it's more like a hobby. Work is what people do to survive. See working class vs owner class.

Wealth hoarders can either obsess or not obsess about hoarding more wealth, like any person with a hobby.

So, how much time they spend on their hobby and what hours they spend on their hobby really depends on their temperament.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 4 days ago

Bold of you to assume they work.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago

There isn't one type. There are the ones like Bezos and Dell, who got rich by growing one or more businesses, and are still at it. They likely don't work normal hours, but they likely work more than 40. Some of those, like Gates, get older and move on to other things like foundation work, but not an actual job. Hard to say what kind of hours they work. Then there are the ones like Christy Walton, who inherited their wealth and don't really ever work.

[-] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

Best/most honest answer here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

They don't really have to work at all.

[-] StaySquared@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I guess that would depend in what industry they're working or if they're making money from financial investments exclusively.

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Nope. A lot of them pretend to work, though.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
67 points (89.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

25212 readers
2029 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS