A few hundred years ago they chopped heads off of kings and queens for spending too much on everything, and now they do it for them
I'm all for eating a nice dinner. But how do you get to a dinner bill that size?
Famous chefs who have more people requesting them than they have time in the day, so they go to whoever pays the most.
Like, Gordon Ramsey still does private events, but only if they pay more than he could be making with his TV deals.
Meanwhile just as good chefs that didn't get the fame break (or possibly better but their personality means they shouldn't be let out of the kitchen) are struggling to make ends meet.
same as it ever was.
Pick an industry that is also the case. In marketing There are people earning 7 figures for configuring a Google ads deck that a talented undergrad could do in half the time
In acting you can just throw a dart at the SAG directory.
Painting, music, business administration, politics. You name it.
Gordon: welcome to my fancy private dinner experience. What can I make for you?
Guest: I would like your finest grilled cheese sandwich please.
Gordon: oh fuck, oh shit!
You may have to be more specific with the definition of grilled cheese for him.
What the fuck was that?? I was hoping for some chronic grilly chee but that was an abomination. I’ve seen children make better grilled cheese sandwiches.
Lol I can hear him saying that.
Also for good measure
"for dessert I'd like, a banana freshly peeled with a small glass of grocery store orange juice."
Perfection costs a whole lot more than really, really good because costs go up exponentially.
You need multiple times the staff on hand to cook and server everything at the same time, and they should be highly paid professionals. You need to be able to discard the majority of your food supplies, which already cost a lot more than normal, to have the perfect version of every dish. The setting probably costs a lot to set up and clean up after, and attention to detail costs time and money.
It is a huge waste, but that is why it costs so much.
Everyone also has to pass a bunch of security and background checks, which costs money as well. And i am sure the supply chains for staye dinners are more expensive for the same reason
Mark up everything by 500%
Do you mean 500x? Because that looks like 500x.
Well, la de da with your fancy regular €100K dinners.
Step one is probably hosting it at the Palace of Versailles
They felt they had money to burn after cutting pensions?
Hand fished, gold coated lobster: $1,000 Cooking the lobster: $474,000
Why didn’t the king foot the bill he’s the king and he’s rich.
Let the heads roll.
Kings aint get rich by paying for shit.
I guess this solves part of the mystery about why the French rioted when they raised the retirement age last year
This breaks down into a nightmare in my mind.
What are the components of a meal and the service attached to it that can be stretched to the maximum for someone who "has everything".
Honestly, expensive produce doesn't generate this sort of expense.
Must the catering staff all hold MBA's? Each fork is hundreds of years old and polished to a mirror finish?
The carpet and underlay, is freshly laid for the meal; and then immediately ripped up and destroyed afterwards.
I doubt Charles passed along the edict that he requires an outrageously ostentatious meal, but the French "just knew" that was the right thing to do.
I want to believe heads of state would be content eating the same meals that are served in the Olympic village.
This is the worst form of consumerism, you just point to your nose and people scramble to pamper you with praise, favour and treats.
What a truly wonderful way to outsource waste, without feeling any personal responsibility towards the consequences of your lifestyle.
And that's to please a king, so it's not like a political favor. Macron is getting nothing out of this.
Peasants have been complaining about royal feasts throughout history. You're just one scrap going through a long line of machines that chew you up, squeeze taxes out of you, and spit you out the other end to dig another hole.
Why would you waste all that money on a king who is a figurehead at best ?
Because it's big club and we ain't in it
I think it was a 100 person dinner full of french and english celebrities, including macron, and the king.
Then the rich act shocked and appalled when people talk about a violent uprising.
France should’ve elected a left wing majority. Now you’re stuck with Macron’s classist attitude.
A Frenchman wining and dining an English monarch. What has the world come to.
What. How do you even spend that much on a dinner, even for 1000 people.
And like. It's King Charles. I loved the Queen and thought she was iconic, and even I don't really care about Charles. All of my friends in my circle actively despise him and what he represents. Literally why are you trying to curry favour with him that hard.
for 1000 people
$500 per person would be quite cheap for this sort of thing, given that a middle-class wedding often costs around $250 per person. (I'm guessing each guest at this dinner drank well over $500 of wine alone.)
I have no clue how you define "middle-class" but not even the fanciest weddings I've been to have spent even close to $250 per person. That kind of expenditure sounds quite a lot more like upper-class to me. Assuming you invite 100 people to the wedding, an average Joe will not have 25k to spend on one party.
the national average cost of a wedding in 2023 was $35,000
The average American wedding cost $29,000 in 2023.
The average cost of a wedding is $33,000 in 2024.
I assume that these estimates are based on different datasets, and my guess is that they're biased upwards, but they do roughly match what I know from personal experience.
The issue with these statistics is that they look at the average, which is heavily boosted by the exceptionally expensive weddings of the higher upper-class. The median is significantly lower.
https://silkstemcollective.com/median-and-average-wedding-cost/
Also I'm not American, maybe people there just spend a lot more on weddings in general than what I'm used to.
You're correct, but even the median (with inflation) is still probably over $20,000 right now (based on the assumptions that it was $18,000 in 2019 and 2020 is not representative). I think my broader point still stands.
I know a person currently planning a relatively small wedding, and she's trying very hard to save money. One cost-cutting measure was booking a space on the fourth floor of a building without an elevator. (She asked me whether or not it would be possible for strong guests to carry elderly guests up the stairs.) Her budget is still $10,000.
You were the Chosen One! You were supposed to guillotine the monarchs, not dine with them!
This works out to 2500 euros per person, which is expensive but not that bad in context. It's easily possible to drop hundreds at a restaurant in my medium-sized city, and an event like this is obviously at a whole other level.
Can we just eat the rich already? I think I've worked up an appetite for it.
Well they seem to have saved a lot by not providing reasonable quarters for the Olympic village so it probably works out in the end.
Let him eat cake next time!
Another reason why the monarchy should not exist
Force everyone who attended to pay their $3,000 a plate bill
That's a few months of food for an average person
Imagine you get a dish worth probably tens of thousands alone and you don't like it.
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link