773
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 237 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Walzamania is running wild. I checked out his resume and background. He is the best choice and a decent human. Which is rare in these times. I give props where it is due for Dems not fucking up here.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago

Hey! We didn’t say you could have him!

RUDE!!!

(Kidding. He will be an awesome VP.)

[-] mitchty 66 points 3 months ago

I’m sad cause the dude managed to get a ton of shit through with a one vote majority here. He’s a good politician that doesn’t bs too much. Course the right here is as crazy as anywhere, if more democrats in the us were like mn democrats more shit would get done ignoring the cheese and wine coalition.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

There's a reason why we are a consistently blue voting state in presidential elections. The vast majority aren't wealthy landowning types. We also have a very educated population. Is it more educated than other states? I don't know, but we pride ourselves on it.

I'm gonna miss him as governor, but damn if he doesn't solidify the ticket.

[-] MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

I had the privilege of hearing him speak to the Kansas Democratic Party earlier this year and was kind of blown away by him. She made the right choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Plavatos@sh.itjust.works 183 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wondered where I remembered him from, it was this juxtaposition of photos:

Additional context: around the same time Governor Walz (upper) was signing a bill for guaranteed school lunches the Governer of Arkansas (lower) was signing a bill rolling back protections on child labor.

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/gov-tim-walz-signs-universal-school-meals-bill-into-law/

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162531885/arkansas-child-labor-law-under-16-years-old-sarah-huckabee-sanders

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 70 points 3 months ago

That photo of him! Every person in it is so genuinely happy! Brought tears to my eyes.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago

Hot Damn! The DNC didn't fuck up so fucking happy to be wrong and she didn't pick Shapiro.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 months ago

I'm shocked, honestly. Shapiro is the canonical post-Clinton Democrat, all the consent manufacturers were clearly pulling for him.

As one of the leftmost members of the D voting coalition its a strange feeling to not be getting continuously shat upon.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] dvlsg@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Whoa whoa whoa. So Harris is laffin, and Walz is smilin??? Too much happiness.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago

Those poor kids going to work in the mines in the lower pic.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 months ago

The one kid totally has "wtf?" face going on. I feel bad for those kids. Their parents are all probably total scum bags.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Gov. Tim Walz signs universal school meals bill into law

vs

Arkansas Gov. Sanders signs a law that makes it easier to employ children

I literally laughed out loud when I read the second headline. The kids faces says it all.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 123 points 3 months ago

Brilliant pick. This is the kind of energy that will get the Midwest to drive this national election and bring enough casserole for everyone at the potluck

[-] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago

From Minnesota, respectfully, it is hotdish not casserole.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Hazzia@infosec.pub 116 points 3 months ago

Everybody anxious about a VP Shapiro can finally get a little bit of sleep now lol

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] exanime@lemmy.world 102 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just took a stroll through his Wikipedia page and he does seem a better than average politician

  • Has a record of defeating incumbent Republicans

  • Seems to be on the proper side of most policy

  • But more importantly, by far, seems to be a guy actually capable of learning from his mistakes

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 88 points 3 months ago

I am so fucking excited to vote.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

I'm a registered libertarian. Despite the craziness, I don't plan on changing that. I wouldn't have voted for Biden, strictly because I live in a state that has 0% chance of flipping, BUT I routinely vote for democrats in senate/house/local races where my vote actually does make a difference. I also encouraged friends with similar mindsets in battleground states to vote Biden.

I think the democratic party needs to fracture, it just needs to fracture AFTER the republican party.

All of that is a setup to say: I also am excited, and if someone like me is excited, I think that's a DAMN good sign. I cannot wait to piss and moan about a Harris admin. It is a big damn country, I look forward to disagreement returning to the point it doesn't result in erosion of fundamental rights and democracy itself, not to mention godamn violent insurrection.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

The only thing that can fracture the two party system is ranked choice or alternative voting systems. FPTP guarantees two parties.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aniki@lemmings.world 27 points 3 months ago

I am too. I went from being convinced we were heading straight to tyranny and now I am excited for a potential future with actual liberals at the helm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Scallionsandeggs@lemmy.world 88 points 3 months ago

Between the response to this ticket and the big antitrust win today, this is the most optimistic I've been about the direction of American politics in a very long time.

[-] GoTeamBoobies@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago

Is....is this... Is this what hope feels like? 😔

[-] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 29 points 3 months ago

Doesn't matter if we don't actually go vote.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 55 points 3 months ago

My sister used to be the head of the environmental department of one of the suburbs of Minneapolis. She's met Tim Walz a few times, and has had nothing but good things to say about both his personality and his attitude toward the environment. The US has pretty slim pickings for good politicians these days, but I really feel that Tim is on that list. I'm feeling hopeful about American politics for the first time since I learned about how American politics works!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] xerazal@lemmy.zip 54 points 3 months ago

Madame President Mamala Harris, thank you for making the correct choice.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago

I loved this guy since the juxtaposition photos between him and the child labor folks. I wonder if Harris campaign is getting to make decisions because this whole situation blindsided DNC officials/strategists who have historically made stupid calls. They haven't had 4 years to overthink a campaign.

As cynical as I am, I think laughing Harris just felt a good feeling about smiling Walz that she just didn't get from Shapiro, and no strategist hack was able to convince them otherwise.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

DNC sucks at strategy. I think making quick decisive moves, especially with the public's diminished attention span is proving very effective. Campaigns should probably focus on being like 3 months before the elections in this era.

[-] Scallionsandeggs@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Should Harris win (and especially if she wins big), I could see it changing the nature of campaigning here. Three months goes against all the conventional wisdom.

The media won't be happy about it, but it's past time we bring the press back to public service and away from profiteering anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago

the guy the popularized calling republicans weird nonetheless

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] odelik@lemmy.today 50 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I was hoping it was Kelly or Walz over Shapiro.

To me, as Bernie Sanders flavored "Socialist", Walz is an amazing pick.

However I had a preference for Kelly since I strongly believe that his history as an astronaut and his popularity in a state like AZ could help drive a lot of independent voters to the Democrat's platform come November.

All that said, progressives know that progressive policy is also extremely popular when messaged broadly and communicating the benefits to the invidual and country. Hopefully Kamama & Walz use their experince with their A* campaign team to drive that home. And then fucking deliver.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 49 points 3 months ago

Crazy this dude is only a year older than her. Super happy with the pick btw

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

Yeah! I was so worried she'd tank her momentum by picking Shapiro and ham-handedly presenting it. I continue to be impressed with the Harris team's ability to both politic and stay tapped into the people's sentiments.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago

Half the pictures I see of him, he reminds me Jeffrey Lebowski (David Huddleston).

[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago

Your revolution is over, Mr. Trump. Condolences. The bums lost. My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Donald?

The bums will always lose!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago

Uh oh Donny! He's a veteran, too! You wouldn't shit on a veteran, right?

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago

As much as I would have liked to see her make a strategic pick who could help her win an at risk state like Arizona or Pennsylvania, he has less baggage than Shapiro.

I think too, there's strategy in a non-strategic pick. The cynics would have said "Oh, she only picked Shapiro because she needs Pennsylvania" or "Yeah, yeah, he's an astronaut, but she wants Arizona".

In this case? I think he's going to be a delight to watch. He'll devastate Vance in the debate.

[-] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 32 points 3 months ago

I think he's pretty strategic, not to any specific state, but to rural Middle America in general. He grew up working on a farm, worked in a factory for a bit, joined the army then worked as a teacher and football coach, he's the salt of the earth common American vance pretends to be. Not saying he'll turn all the rural areas blue but even going from say 20% to 25% will help a lot in those swing states which have a large rural population.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] archomrade@midwest.social 42 points 3 months ago

After feeling absolutely hopeless with the democratic direction for basically 3 years, I had put out of my mind the liklihood that they would pick Walz.

As a MN resident I floated him like 4 months ago as a Biden replacement over shitlibs like Newsome, but I honestly didn't expect leadership to consider him for anything other than his current position

I'll be sad to see him go but I'm much less nihilistic about the general now, so I'll take it.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

“Kamala Walz” sounds like an Australian dance.

Anyway, after seeing Walz’s record I think he’s a great choice. Unfortunately as VP he’s not a policy-maker, even though the VP can wield some influence, but hopefully his presence will drive things in a positive direction.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 41 points 3 months ago

I still wonder if Kelly would have delivered more cheap voter appeal, but Walz is doubtless the best pick on merit and policy and will be the better asset as VP should she win.

In the end though I'm just so happy it's not Shapiro (please announce it officially so I can breathe).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ech@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago

I was real worried she was gonna re-saddle her campaign with an anti-Palestine running mate. This is a relief and gives me some hope for this Nov.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago

We can now stand on a solid ticket from top to bottom. Waltz will wipe the floor with Vance.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
773 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19081 readers
3496 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS