this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
373 points (97.0% liked)

News

35821 readers
1921 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sho@lemmy.world 173 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Didn't he tell them to "go fuck themselves?" 🤔

[–] Enthusiasticwhale@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He did and how he's suprised I guess

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Poor Mr. Perfume he must REALLY need the money...

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Gambit? Masterful. Car door? Slammed. Dick? Fully inside car door. 12-D chess? Played. Same time tomorrow.

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Look at Mr. "Multple dicks to slam into car doors" over here 😆

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was gonna say doors probably won't chop a dick completely off, but if it's a cyber truck all bets are off.

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I had almost forgotten about that "finger chop" feature on them...those videos are nightmare fuel

[–] Numenor@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Sho@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Ah yes I remember the Xmen known as dick, he had such a big....personality that sometimes he can be kind of a wanker🤣🤣

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So he's the head of the conspiracy and should be the one charged?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 165 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, suing your customers is a brilliant way to get more people to buy your stuff.

[–] cmrn@lemmy.world 150 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

So let me get this straight…

  1. buy a platform
  2. ruin it and push away advertisers
  3. tell them you don’t need them and they should go fuck themselves
  4. sue them for leaving

…?

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 63 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] darki@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

By this next next year... Definitely within the next 1000 months

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 97 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Advertisers have given me no moneys either.

Send cheque plz.

I'd really love to see fElon get what he wants here. One paid ad from all the companies.

"Elon fucks kids"

[–] ChadCMulligan@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

Can I chip in on this…?

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.org 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Send cheque plz

I read that in the voice of Mona-Lisa Saperstein from Parks and Rec

Money pweeez!

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

yeah damnit, I waste my personal time having to watch the damn things. Advertisers should be paying us for the privilege of our attention.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 96 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Suing former advertisers may possibly not be the best way to get other advertisers to come to your platform.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 77 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Man who told advertisers to go fuck themselves sues advertisers for not spending money on his platform.

I'm sure this will be sure to bring in tons of advertising dollars to Der Xitter.

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 15 points 2 years ago

I ain't no genius, but maybe the advertisers are busy fucking themselves as per Elon's suggestion. 🤷‍♂️

[–] some_guy 73 points 2 years ago

Wow, I didn't think he could top his past idiocy, but this is pretty impressive. "You were unfair to me because I'm a terrible piece of shit and you didn't want the association of your brand and my nazi site so you owe me money!" It's just incredible.

Hat tip, Lonnie. You've outdone yourself again.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Musk is suing under antitrust laws. I’m not sure they work that way. Antitrust laws prevent producers from consolidating and exploiting consumers. However, when it comes to advertising placements, the companies are consumers, not producers, and I don’t think a consumer advocacy group (which the World Federation of Advertisers functions as in this regard) is illegal.

I don’t know, I am not a lawyer, but it seems like Twitter is grasping at straws here.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Let's also note that at any other time, Musk would be railing against antitrust laws.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

The interesting thing is that it means he is desperate enough to try something that makes him look this stupid

Anybody with Elon Musk centric stocks needs to sell them quickly

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I know right? I mean if they colluded to lower advertising prices through collective agreement that would be something. Especially if they had an internal forcing mechanism to ensure compliance.

But um, they set out voluntary guidelines they suggested everyone follow to protect each member's own best interests, and decided to spend zero dollars to buy nothing, which is a far far cry from trying to spend zero dollars to buy something.

What an ultra-maroon.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mandatory product purchasing. The ultimate capitalist’s wet dream…

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just like vehicle insurance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 years ago

Your honor, I demand they like me. Why doesn't anyone like me...

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you Exhibit A.

That is all, I rest my case. Thank you.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Imagine the prosecuting attorney in the opening scene of Better Call Saul, coming into the court room with a tape of this in his hand.

Without saying a word, the tv cart is pushed into the court room and he slowly pushed the tape in.

The entire court room stays silent as the video is played, with the lone exception of Musk who is tweeting about how unfair the judge is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sar1n@infosec.pub 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Goddamn he looks so punchable

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The duden must have a fetish for doomed lawsuits.

[–] Rayspekt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Courtroom BDSM fetish

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Didn't he sue another company that did tests on the site to see if ads would show up beside hateful content, which showed they would, and that case ended up being dismissed?

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago

"Why did people stop paying me for services I no longer provide!?"
- Some guy who burnt down his house and then yelled at Air BnB users for cancelling their bookings

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Free market gets sued for practising freedom

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Being a lawyer and working for someone like Musk must be both rewarding and embarrassing at the same time.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

rewarding

lucrative, yes... rewarding? maybe not so much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Rewarding because you can accurately gauge exactly how much smarter you are than the world's richest man?

Or rewarding because you get to burden the legal system with all those hypotheticals that the one troll in your law classes kept asking and your professors kept claiming "no judge would ever entertain that idea"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

“Free speech absolutionist” my ass

[–] Enthusiasticwhale@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

His "Free Speech Absolutionism" is just.... Freedom from any consequences for what you say.... Which is also a really stupid thought process..

[–] General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Welp, time to set up a lemonade stand and sue everybody who didn’t stop to buy my $5000 cups of watered-down kool-aid.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 11 points 2 years ago

I didn’t know we could be entitled to advertisement money. Hang on while I sue Unilever for some free money in return for wearing a sandwich board with their logo on it

[–] lookorex@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Something, something, free market something

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

What a pinheaded twit.

load more comments
view more: next ›