I don't follow the American national anthem lyrics, I just googled them for the tag line and wtf.
Edit: oh its about some battle according to my bf
because killing everyone you disagree with will fix your life?
guarantee you this person advocated for glassing the middle east in the early 2000s
I'd put money on it. Like a decent amount. 100% this guy was a "muslamists aren't compatible with our values" ghoul and still probably is. It's cos the ceo was white he's blates mad.
Who wants to bet he’s advocated for the funny rope day at least once?
Phrasing this as some kind of trivial disagreement is an extension of politics in the US being totally disconnected from the material conditions and lives of most everyday people. They literally can't comprehend the idea that executives should be held accountable for the death and destruction their companies leave behind
Motherfuckers saying "diagreements" like this guy got killed over his pizza topping or ice cream preferences or something.
I wonder if there's Americans who have seen the response to this guys death and been like "wait maybe I'm wrong here?"
shirley there has been at least one
I actually want you to call me Shirley, thanks
Probs said “we might disagree about who we voted for but we can still be friends”, or something, which is a load of bollocks.
It is a systemic problem to be sure, but that doesn't mean that enriching yourself through the extreme imisseration of others is somehow morally neutral. Like that american who went to Palestine, stole land and defended himself with "If I didn't steal it someone else would".
When your entire economic system is based on extreme inequality it makes sense that this is a line of thinking that would be both spread and adapted. I don't have to question why child workers are manufacturing my goods under extremely poor and dangerous conditions, it is just how the world is.
What disagreement? 
What disagreement motherfucker? 
They're always vague like that, because if they said "Kill people just because they think they should be allowed to choose to withhold life-saving treatments just to line their own pockets", then it would sound absolutely justified.
The founding fathers used to duel to the death people for much less.
We nearly had musk v Elon in mma. It's so unfair. I despise them both but I'd love watching the lizard man beat the crap out of him in the ring.
Old school proper duel with flintlock pistols and it's a total tie with both landing lucky shots on each other, 2 shitbirds 1 stone.
Nooo staaahhppp I don't want to dream!!!
What if zuck won the duel but was injured and as he walked to like go get treatment and his trophy someone just goes "sorry Mr zuck but your skibidi" and the film ends as the bullet takes out zuck and we get cringe 2010 dude action movie expendebles style ending credits with nu-metal kicking in and explosions bskslfkekeldleldlelr that's an explosion sound
I know in my heart that Zuck would have won that fight and it wouldn't have been close. If you look at his competition footage and his stuff with Lex Friedman you'll see him kind of fumbling around, but he's within the 1 standard deviation of a white belt. (Looking back on them with my last year of progress, I see the INSANE foot sweeps he could have hit if he knew they were there). He doesn't get flustered when the rubber meets the road and he is able to execute a game plan. He can do SOMETHING which is more than enough to stop Dr. Eggman.
I think he low diffs if not no diffs
If I recall correctly, the Hamilton-Burr rivalry started with a disagreement over federal banking and how currency should be minted.
Craven apologist boot-people always boil down life and death exploitation to "a disagreement". To quote from someone here: "Fuck you, I wish your entire ideological cohort had been more thoroughly disagreed with in World Disagreement II"
Lmao it took me a second to follow that 🤣
wreck people with one simple response when they chastise you for violent rhetoric:
"im not a pacifist and neither are you"
It might not fix my life completely, but it would improve it measurably
Bring back trial by combat for CEOs but it's against a real life polar bear.
I love the way you think
yeah he just "Disagrees" . with the right to life ..
It's such a fucking silly comeback, like my dude did you think this was deep or well thought out? This is Ben shapiro levels of rebuttal. 0/10 lmao bad lib.
uncritical support to americans killing each other until the continent turns into a nature preserve
We simply had a disagreement whether this cancer treatment should be covered under the insurance policy I am paying for.
Disagreement noted insurance man 
because killing everyone you disagree with will fix your life?
[x] yes chad.jpeg
Depends on where you draw the line on level of disagreement really. Which issues do we disagree on? If it’s “The poor should die” yes actually killing everyone who disagrees with me would improve things dramatically
Errmmm yes I think anyone who thinks "the poor should die" is vigilante bait 💪
because killing everyone you disagree with will fix your life?
i mean
dank memes
Rules:
All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.
No unedited webcomics.
Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop
Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.
Follow the code of conduct.
Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.
Recent reposts might be removed.
No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer
thank you lol
