this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
169 points (72.3% liked)

Science Memes

12349 readers
2097 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 73 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Einstein was clearly no etymologist

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

I can never remember the difference between etymology and entomology and I can't put into words how much that bugs me.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well awktshualy...the definition says reflect, and while diamonds reflect internally, they refract light externally, so, the diamond is not bright because it reflects (those reflections are on the inside) they shine because they refract

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But isn't their shine mostly due to the internal reflection rather than external refraction? That's why the gems are cut angularly, to help with the internal reflection.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can only observe the external properties since you are on the outside

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By that logic, glass mirrors also work by refraction, because it refracts out of the glass before it reaches your eye.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

And so does the internal surface of a diamond.

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Well awktshualy, read the whole definition entry. Pendants are always so eager to ignore lay meanings.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 44 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Albert knows that they actually do shine. This meme could only have been more wrong if it was Plank.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yet another way this is wrong: the primary cause of the adamantine lustre of diamonds is refraction. Any old hunk of metal can reflect light.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't it caused by internal reflection? That, by definition, is what happens when the light doesn't refract out of the diamond.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I considered that when posting, though the play of prismatic colors which defines the diamond's unique lustre, in addition to that same tendency toward internal reflection, are both ultimately caused by the extraordinary refractory properties of the crystal structure, and the refracted light coming out of the diamond after internal reflection is the constituent of the "shine"

[–] DoYouNot@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Rhianna and Einstein both know something about black bodies.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Albert knows that they actually do shine. In infrared

[–] TransSynthesist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Unless they're a crazy diamond. They shine on!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If a post labeled, essentially, 'idiot', has two English mistakes in glurge written for a genius, is that irony?

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing is more on brand than a language pedant making grammar mistakes. What do you expect of person who thinks memorizing rules is the hallmark of intelligence?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Like rain on your wedding day.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If that gets stuck in my head I'm gonna be so fucking mad.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

A free ride, when you already paid.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, "Shine bright like a 120w LED light bulb" doesn't sounds good.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 11 points 2 weeks ago

The "shining" nature of diamonds is not due to their reflective properties, it's due to how they refract.

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

picard

Diamond also has a very high refractive index and a relatively high optical dispersion.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

i mean, they reflect too, everything reflects, though we generally mean specular reflection but diamonds have that too when they're polished nicely.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Everything shines, everything reflects...

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

boomer meme that i probably upvoted on facebook in 2012

[–] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't SIA wrote it and allegedly in like 30 minutes or so?

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
[–] IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

How about shine like a quasar