100
submitted 1 year ago by jimbojambo@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Is this worse than Obama pretending to drink Flint's water?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Othello@hexbear.net 72 points 1 year ago

its worse because it was a betrayal to the black community specifically. flint residents and black Americans thought "god these white racist are KILLING us kids will be permanently maimed. oh look obama hes gonna save us" and then boom i was radicalized the second i saw that slimey motherfucker drink that fake water. as I heard the recorded crowd boo i literally threw up as a teen. my black president who was supposed to care about us see us as human was killing us just like the fucking rest of them seving us up for slaughter to his white masters. truly a life changing moment for me.

[-] impiri@lemm.ee 54 points 1 year ago

This felt like the moment that a million switches flipped inside a million minds, including mine. It was so easy for years to make excuses for why Obama couldn't do this or needed to triangulate on that or whatever, but here he just straight up tells the people to fuck off and stop whining. The dawning realization in the crowd of what he's doing from the time he says "Can I get some water?" to the time he takes that tiny sip of water is still brutal to listen to. I can't imagine what that moment must have felt like for you as a black teenager

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

It really sucks to be black and hate obama and everyone just assumed you're a chud. Like.. did you all not see the 8 years of racist ratfucking he did on behalf of the white supremacists and banks?

[-] Othello@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yes! like did we forget LIBIYA!!! did we forget all the promises he lied about. what did that fuck even fucking do???? the worst part is when people start conversions with "dont you loooooove obama" and if its another black person I go through all his crimes till they call me weird or "too young to know what im talking about". and if its a white liberal i call or imply their a racist and they get upset. (its so fun, truly one of my greatest joys in life). i just say loudly "why BECAUSE IM BLACK?" and then they get embarrassed and leave. once a strange white woman came up to me in a starbucks and put her hand on my shoulder said "im voting for kamala harris" and WINKED. she left that interaction on the brink of tears. im nicer to non strangers btw, I just hate when white people see a black person and think oooh I found one.

[-] StewartCopelandsDad@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

once a strange white woman came up to me in a starbucks and put her hand on my shoulder said "im voting for kamala harris"

Lmfao. You're doing God's work, these people should be terrorized

[-] Othello@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

hooooly shit lmao stalin-feels-good

[-] privatized_sun@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

betrayal to the black community

Amber: "when I hear 'community; I pick up my gun" :amber:

[-] Othello@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

huh? edit: I have deleted everything about her from my brain. is she scared of communities?

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

I can remember one particular line she said that I fully agree with, basically “Most civil rights laws in the US have been federal laws. Community justice in the United States has historically been known as ‘Lynchings’”

She was 100% right, white Americans are rabid animals and need to be controlled by a strong central government.

[-] Othello@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

ahh I see. yeah I think I agree, I know nothing bout this woman other than men are obsessed with her and not in a wholesome way.

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

I remember something she was saying on the chapo podcast a few years ago. It was about people glorifying small towns or communities, and that nobody glorifying it actually lives in one, because American small communities tend to be freaky proto-fascist environments, or something along those lines.

[-] Grimble@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Americans have dadaist politics wtf does this mean in context

[-] privatized_sun@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago

the fish is probably more unhealthy because of mercury and pfas and other shit lol

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

everyone upset about their delicious microplastic fish getting spicier

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

they should eat more bugs

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah Obama’s is way worse because the Flint water actually was (and is afaik) dangerous, whereas the Fukushima water release is perfectly safe and everyone freaking out over it are just scared of nuclear shit.

Do not give anti-nuclear people an inch, or they’ll do things like shut down all the nuclear power plants in Germany while still burning coal. The people scared about this are no different from anti-vaxxers and you should treat them the same

Eating the fish is a dumb pointless stunt, obviously, but unlike Flint people who are worried about this are wrong, and should be properly educated rather than taken seriously.

[-] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I studied some nuclear engineering in University (professor was an expert on Radioactivity and Environmental Accumulation, but I just took some classes out of interest). I think people are rightly worried, but radioactivity is one of those topics that is almost impossible to teach without a lot of explanation or background. I see many takes that I understand are entirely incorrect, but also understand that environmental accumulation isn't a super widely studied phenomenon (pretty much the only tests done are after accidents, where that professor and his like 15 worldwide co-experts rush off to after every spill or accident to study as much as possible for years). That leaves scary gaps in our knowledge, and it's understandable to be skeptical and conservative in how we treat those gaps. That includes this one, so I don't want to take a strong stance, honestly, except that education should come first then decisions can be made which the people agree with.

Tritium is not one I know much about (my professor was a big fan of weather patterns/soil deposits from rains and his studies from Chernobyl and Three Mile Island where this was not studied), but I do know that that professor gave us exams specifically on the problems of Fukushima and was entirely convinced that this was a non-issue even if they dumped it all out in only a few months. And he said this in like 2018. This is entirely an appeal to authority and nobody here knows me to trust it, but just a bit of extra info.

He was also much more nervous about a concentrated location in barrels due to well known accumulation that could occur if those leaked on land (soils, again)

[-] privatized_sun@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Do not give anti-nuclear people an inch

Getting rid of a few reactors is a bad idea, but so is building thousands of them:

2011: "Why nuclear power will never supply the world's energy needs”

news summary: https://phys.org/news/2011-05-nuclear-power-world-energy.html

full PDF: “Is Nuclear Power Globally Scalable?” https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/5/6021970/06021978.pdf

people scared about this are no different from anti-vaxxers

TIL a needle can semi-permanently create zones like in Stalker

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

TIL a needle can semi-permanently create zones like in Stalker

Infectious diseases are far more destructive than any nuclear accident has ever been so idk what your point is?

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

It would take eons for exclusion zones to add up to all the land taken up by non-nuclear sources of energy lol. But since human civilization dropped the ball in the 20th century, there's little point in arguing for a nuclear-dominant grid with thousands of reactors nowadays. May as well do like 80% renewable and 20% nuclear generally speaking.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It's not supposed to supply 100% of the world's energy needs, it's supposed to be a transitional source to move away from fossil fuels and then to renewables. We can build both renewable and nuclear, or we can build renewable and fossil fuels. One of these is much more harmful for the environment. In an ideal world we could just go 100% renewable immediately, but unfortunately that isn't an option. So it's better to go with the "less harmful" option than the "will literally kill the planet and all of us" option instead.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're wrong. The water is probably safe, but the chance of it being unsafe is not negligible. There are a huge range of possible contaminants in that water besides tritium and radiation. And even if the only things to be worried about with that water are radioactivity and tritium levels, you're relying on agencies and companies with very vested interests to lie, to tell the truth.

I'm not saying it's definitely unsafe, but at the same time, there's a definite possibility it is.

[-] WashedAnus@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago
[-] President_Obama@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

How did u know scared

Mods delete this for doxxing plz

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

Men never outgrow their "Hey, I'll give you 5 bucks to eat this bug" days, they just keep raising the stakes.

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago

Worked great for this guy:

CW: Ghoul

On October 30, 1924, Midgley participated in a press conference to demonstrate the apparent safety of TEL, in which he poured TEL over his hands, placed a bottle of the chemical under his nose, and inhaled its vapor for 60 seconds, declaring that he could do this every day without succumbing to any problems.[7][13] However, the State of New Jersey ordered the Bayway plant to be closed a few days later, and Jersey Standard was forbidden to manufacture TEL again without state permission. Production was restarted in 1926 after intervention by the federal government.

Midgley later took a leave of absence from work after being diagnosed with lead poisoning.

[-] SmokinStalin@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

The difference here being the fish is probably actually no worse than any other fish.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

didn't we just do a daily thread about fukushima radiation panic yesterday

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Fukushima content mill is just too lucrative

[-] Marvont@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

paging the trillbillies on a new devils milkshake

[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

No. But only because Chinese health and safety is looking over this guy's shoulder and frowning, while Flint residents were left to take Obungler at face value.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

The Monsanto vampires that claimed glyphosate was safe enough to drink and were put to the test by having a glass of it put in front of them with the cameras rolling was a Jokerfying moment for me.

Unnecessary spoiler alert:

spoilerNo glyphosate was drank.

[-] YuccaMan@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Shoutout to hbomberguy for exposing us youngins to the absolute gem of that gormless shill flopping about like a fish on the dock after being dared to drink weed-killer

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

It was a golden moment.

"It's so safe you can drink it!!!"

"Okay here's some, drink it"

"....no"

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Remind me again what's this thing called "bioacumulation"?

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh damn imagine if people ate fish that was subjected to some entity dumping random shit in the ocean. now that would be quite bad, good thing this phenomenon is localized entirely to the coast of fukushima

[-] comfortable_doug@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

SIMPSONS DID IT!

[-] IceWallowCum@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The thorium salts give it a distinct spicyness that is just 🤌 trés magnifique

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Perhaps that fella could drink a the-doohickey instead. One of his predecessors said it was the last thing in his life!

[-] impiri@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

ICYMI a few days ago, an old favorite character also came back for this story arc

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Rule 3 : WHERES THE SAUCE?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
100 points (99.0% liked)

news

23496 readers
712 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS