this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
401 points (93.7% liked)

politics

22164 readers
3569 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 194 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Let's blame Joe so Kamala can run again.

Not fooling me, DNC. I smell what you're cooking.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 75 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I want to tell myself that there's no way in hell they would let this happen, let alone make it happen.

Then I remember it's the DNC.

[–] some_guy 44 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s not like they colluded to kneecap Bernie’s campaign. Wait…

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 6 days ago (35 children)

Kamala or Buttigeig, you can bet on it.

Seriously, go to Vegas. At least you'll make money on the end of the world.

load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Helvetica@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

She's free to run again, but this time she has to win the primary. And that's unlikely. It's rare in modern times for someone to lose a Presidential election and get another shot at it, Nixon and Trump are the only two in over a hundred years.

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago

You seem to forget what they did to sanders. If they want a specific candidate they will make sure they win.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Or else what? Withdraw the nomination? (You can't withdraw a nomination lol)

Harris chose this

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 126 points 6 days ago (4 children)

To be honest, this is just a signal that she probably wouldn't have been a good leader. Better than Trump, sure, but that bar is so low it's a tripping hazard.

She should have told Biden to pound sand after locking up the nomination.

But we should verify the claim before passing judgement.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 42 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Honestly, her campaign already signaled that. This, if true, just reinforces it. It also reinforces that Biden was a bad leader, which he was.

Obligatory: I voted for Harris and Biden and dems down ticket every election since I've been old enough to vote.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Oh? Pulling a “Republican”? My wife made me do it? Wasn’t my fault? Attempting to distance herself so she can make a run for office again.

[–] Zzyzx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 5 days ago

Yeah, seriously. She's an adult. She could have just said "Thanks Joe, now go away." What could he have done? Fired her?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] head_socj@midwest.social 12 points 4 days ago

Color me surprised that the Democrats have as much blame for our current situation as the Republicans. Nobody, NOBODY, wanted to return to normal; they wanted real change and the best they got was state-sponsored financing for tech companies and unequal economic policies

[–] nul42@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wow, so if true this implies that in the Democratic party even the women running for president has to do what the big man says. Hope this is false.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 76 points 6 days ago (4 children)

It's ridiculous to think that Harris couldn't have done what she wanted. Once you're named the nominee, that's it. They're not going to back out.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 57 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If she was unwilling to break from him because of his wishes, even if she was theoretically able, that speaks volumes about her as a leader.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (5 children)

If she runs again, we lose again.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Honestly this behavior is going to keep getting highlighted from Biden because he was an absolute stubborn idiot. He had polling showing him losing to Trump with over 400 electoral votes for MONTHS before dropping out. He blamed his family for staying in as long as he did, obviously it was him or what was left of him.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 5 days ago (2 children)

History will not look kindly on Biden for fucking over his one job of stopping Trump. Didn't arrest him, didn't defeat him, didn't stop most of the Jan 6 protestors, didn't go after the enablers of his actions, didn't really stop anything Trump did to avoid debt and jail and we ended up with him for Round 2, Even Worse This Time.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 29 points 5 days ago (4 children)

100% agreement. He should have arrested Agent Krasnov and his henchmen on the first day of his presidency, and detained them in isolation without bail or access to the media, until their trials were resolved. If he had done that, Krasnov and his Gang would be in prison right now, instead of the White House.

Instead Biden appointed a weakass Republican as his AG who gave him a 2 year head start to run out the clock.

The Dems had the perfect chance to defend our country from the MAGA scourge, but they totally abdicated their responsibility. It will be 100 times harder to take it back now, and I don't see it happening without violence.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago (1 children)

She is her own person and has to live with the consequences of her choices like everybody else. It's all in the past now and just a footnote in history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PeteZa@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago

I am pretty sick of the Democrats bullshit, but I’m even more sick of the Republicans bullshit.

I hate it here.

[–] quack@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

Libs be libbing

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 54 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Sounds like an excuse. She could've had a different stance but didn't. Because she's the same thing. She was asked point blank how she's any different than Biden and she couldn't answer.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (19 children)

She was elected, not appointed. She could say and do what she wanted and theres not much Biden could have done about it.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

My god! You mean they attached a bomb collar around her neck and said if she didn't comply they would detonate it?

Wait, they didn't do anything of the sort? Well, sounds like they didn't force her to do anything and the only thing stopping her from speaking out was her own spineless cowardice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

If anyone wants some good rage material, watch the Pod Save America interview with Harris staffers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 48 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I can believe this. She seemed frustrated when she spoke about the Palestine situation, and I picked up a strong subject that she wanted to say more about her objections over Israel's actions than she did.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, but that didnt bode well for her as a president...

She was the candidate, crowned with zero primary weeks before the election, with zero threat of being replaced.

But she stuck line by line to what Bidens team said

Buden's team that was Hillary's team, and before that Bill's team.

Kamala would have been an empty suit for the same neoliberal machine and she would have appointed the DNC chair back to that faction so they could influence the primary in four years.

If Kamala literally had to say exactly what her advisors said when she was literally irreplaceable, she would have been a president in name only.

Don't get me wrong, I held my nose and voted D like always, but I knew she was fucking it up, and long term that might have been for the best.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Tim Walz came out swinging, and they instantly sidelined him.

That alone was enough to say that the campaign was fucked.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 46 points 6 days ago (5 children)

“Didn’t allow her” what does that even mean, in the context of the campaign? What the actual fuck was she doing listening to ANYTHING from Biden at that point? He was a clear looser. He stepped back from the campaign (after he was forced to, but he did nonetheless). That was an incredibly obvious opportunity for Harris to openly and cleanly split from policies she thought were wrongheaded - but nope, can’t have that. Jesus tapdancing christ.

Biden’s hubris put us here, I guess. What an unmitigated fucking tool. He sold us down the river and expects to be remembered fondly by history? Fuck that. The title of his subsection in history books will be “The President who Couldn’t Keep the Republic” (a pointed reference to Ben Franklin’s quip at the original constitutional convention).

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 28 points 6 days ago (4 children)

The pressure the DNC seems to exert over it's canidates is insane. There was probably a lot of pressure on her to toe the line. I heard they reigned in Walz quite a bit too.

Maybe one day the DNC will learn

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 4 days ago

Like they were ever going to.

If she was going to do something different to what the party wants, she'd never have been their nominee to start with.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (10 children)

I am wondering if the mods of news@lemmy.world and politics@lemmy.world regret censoring the people who rightfully said these things and it would cost us the election. Like there's mods in here who go "yeah that sucks, I knew it." but also just defended Biden/Harris and removed good faith users who posted citations that even their beloved Media Bias Bot said was a good source.

They did it, banned the people who said it, and then people went "where are all those critics now? i guess putin turned them off! hurr hurr haw haw!"

Genuinely wonder if they question their choices of just doing this for free with literally zero benefit to their website and the country as a whole.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 25 points 6 days ago (2 children)

WDYM "let"? What was he gonna do? Sniff her?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (3 children)

His legacy is in the toilet so congratulations advisors.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Honestly, I kinda don't buy the idea Biden controlled Harris. Biden could have in 2008, but not in 2024. We all saw his term. He could be great, but when he slowed and floundered, it hampered his goals.

I'm torn between:

"I don't think an adult woman would instantly bind herself to an old man, she can have bad ideas on her own."

"I don't think she had everything planned out, she took advice from those around her, and the advice was shit but it's hard to get anything from outside this POV without getting even worse feedback."

But either way, I'm kind of glad that parts of the DNC is admitting fault after royally fucking up a second time and giving us Trump again. But I was also told they learned mistakes from 2016, and clearly they didn't, and must have fired everyone who did.

I wish Harris won merely as a stop-gap who is younger and more coherent, maybe could have gotten someone better next primary. Would have been messy and I would prefer anyone else, but not as bad. But it wouldn't have stopped the fascist uprising we're having, just keeping the cyst growing until it popped. If Biden didn't get Trump arrested, I doubt Harris would have, despite her history.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

Suddenly her campaign choices make a lot more sense...

load more comments
view more: next ›