this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
379 points (99.2% liked)

politics

22537 readers
3682 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump appointed Elon Musk, head of the DOGE, to investigate how a journalist was accidentally added to a Signal chat discussing military operations in Yemen.

National Security Adviser Mike Waltz admitted fault but could not explain how the contact was saved. Trump speculated that the journalist may have added himself.

The investigation will involve Musk’s technical team, the National Security Council, and White House lawyers.

A federal lawsuit challenges the use of Signal for government communication, alleging it violates federal law.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Certainnarrator3@lemm.ee 172 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Trump speculated that the journalist may have added himself.

You can't even do that on Signal! But MAGAts will eat it up and keep repeating it cuz of how dumb they are.

[–] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 142 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ok let’s suppose you could though. Wouldn’t that make it EVEN MORE criminally negligent to discuss classified info there?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Right??? Like oh my actual god, if a journalist could do this (it's completely, categorically impossible), then every nation-state on Earth would use it to trivially eavesdrop.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago

Yeah, this would make the story exponentially worse. It'd be like if you got caught cheating on your wife and went "whoa calm down! I didn't know that woman, she just showed up to my Friday night gang bang unannounced!”

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 28 points 4 days ago

exactly. I use and love signal. its a fantastic privacy tool - seriously! but the amount of pure stupid on display by this administration is just too much to take.

[–] PointyReality@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

With the MAGAts its best to imagine a very low bar, then lower that again by half the amount and thats where they are in terms of how dumb they are.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago

"Think of the most average person you know, and then realize that ~~half of all people are dumber than that~~ every one of these morons has the collective IQ of a carrot."

[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Why would they discuss classified military plans on an app where outsiders could just "add themselves". That argument isn't helping their case...

Nevermind. I need to stop thinking about things. The sheer stupidity hurts my brain.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 7 points 4 days ago

We’re supposed to think “he (the journalist) is so bad and evil he hacked into the secure platform” — not that that helps their case either.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 days ago

"Hold my unlocked phone while I chug this beer!"

《criminal mastermind journalist adds himself to confidential chat group》

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

You know what you can do? Anyone can add to a group their in. At least from what I've seen. Secure for govy talk for sure.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

signal group chats can have admins and users. admins are able to control access to the group.

signal is a social communication network. yes, when everything works well and people dont screw up, its wonderfully private and secure - one of the best and easiest to use secure social communication tools around.

the real issue is... these idiots used it (probably from their personal phones!) like it was NSA approved tech. lead idiot hegseth being all "opsec is clean" while an unknown participant has been added to the group chat is just... I have no words. these people are playing dressup.

signal on an uncompromised device and with decent digital hygiene will keep a whole bunch of people and TLAs out of your business. however, I do not expect the US Govt planing military fucking strikes via signal just so the "principals" can conveniently sip drinks by the pool instead of being in an NSA approved communication facility.

seriously, fuck!

[–] Funky_Beak 8 points 4 days ago

Oh yeah they are boys playing men. It's some wild shit to see.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 129 points 4 days ago

OK... so you want to say he added himself... which let's ignore that you can't do that, but say you can. Then why are they using this app? Basically saying national security measures out in the public. That's not a better look.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 85 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I dare say I'm beginning to suspect this Trump fellow may not be as competent as he claims

[–] Demonmariner@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago
[–] shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee 57 points 4 days ago

“We have investigated ourselves and discovered nothing happened.”

[–] kingie_d@feddit.uk 52 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Haha! WTF! It's a group chat in a messaging app - not some super high tech hacking operation!

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's just a case of a boomer not knowing how to use their fucking phone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Considering what these people are like, it may very well be the entire dark net.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is actually good news. We knew there was never going to be a valid investigation anyway, so at least this forces the MuskRat to waste at least a portion of his resources on this cover-up. He'll also certainly violate a few laws while doing it, so when they finally lose power, we can slam him with those charges as well, and lock him up for longer, and fine his estate another several billion in fines and damages.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't have any faith whatsoever that, if we can oust the fascists from power, they'll face any consequences at all. There will be no Nuremberg trials this time. They're more likely to just get voted back in.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No, not the next time. If we manage to wrest power from them again, it won't be with the current bunch of weak, spineless weenies that comprise the current Dem leadership, like that fucking scumbag Chuck Schumer.

Our liberators will be a new guard of Democrats, who are fucking pissed off as Hell, and it will be their pledge to purge MAGA from our government and our country by any means necessary, that gives them power. They will take power knowing they are expected to punish the MAGA Traitors to Hell and back, and they'll do it.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Here's hopin'!

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 24 points 4 days ago

They should have used something more secure, like an AOL chatroom. Or public IRC.

"Hey Mr. @BigBrain, can I have an @ on my user name too?"

@BigBrain "Sure!"

lmao what's to investigate other than what dumb pieces of shit these are?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

He's unqualified, but at this point I'm surprised they didn't assign the case to a cactus named detective pokey.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Like any idiot who doesn't want to take account for doing something idiotic, you need to send five people after the "true cause", when everybody knows exactly what it is already.

  1. It's illegal to use commercial means to discuss national security matter or military engagement
  2. You typed "J G" into a fucking app and shared said secrets with someone who wasn't cleared.

Finding different ways to explain it isn't going to distract from point #1, and only further explain how fucking dumb you all are.

Idiots.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It will tho. This will 100% work. Musk will say there was some backdoor hacking bull crap going on and the journalist snuck into the meeting and then made it seem like he was invited by accident to make them look bad. It will be played off as a nasty attack that was only meant to make the Republican heroes of this country look bad while also risking national security and the lives of those in the military.

And they will eat it up like pigs. God I hope I'm wrong.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think you are wrong, but only in the you're not thinking about the big picture.

Elon "I traced the DDOS to Ukrainian terrorists" Musk is in charge of this. Someone on Twitter (probably his alt) is going to post a conspiracy on Twitter about Ukrainian or Canadian hackers being behind it, and he's going to retweet it with some plausibly deniable bullshit like "not far off," and rally up his cult of reactionary prokaryots to demand a economic or military response. It's yet another golden opportunity for the crony collective to sweep their own incompetence under the rug while simultaneously scapegoating another country to push their unspoken-but-obvious agenda.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I hate that I read this and immediately went "yup, that's how it'll go" without a hint of irony.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“Elon Musk has offered to put his technical experts on this to figure out how this number was inadvertently added to the chat. Again, to take responsibility and ensure this can never happen again.”

Take responsibility? That would be unprecedented.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Just wait till Leon assigns Big Balls to the case -- they'll get to the bottom of this in a flash

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 days ago

How about investigating why they were using signal and not all in prison for it.

Good, waste more millions of dollars having the Musktard "investigate." Sounds like a perfect plan, you misplanted piece of fucking abortion, Trump.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

So next time it will be fucked up all the same, but using X private messages instead of Signal.

That should do!

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 20 points 4 days ago

Its probably just pretext to arrest the editor, and charge him with treason .

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 18 points 4 days ago

We can all sleep better knowing Shitler is on the case.

[–] jojo@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 days ago

This belongs in politicalmemes /s

[–] philpo@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

To be a pessimist here: This will be the end of signal. They will move in on the LLC and foundation soon citing national security reasons. Or they may have done so already but kept things under the rugs due to national security laws.

And to play a conspiracy theorist for once: Maybe that was the plan all along. We all know how much Elmo hates Signal.

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 10 points 4 days ago

'first buddy' ( ° ͜ʖ͡°)╭∩╮

[–] igg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

...and they were roommates

[–] firebyte@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Unrelated, though what's with Musk, perhaps other MAGAts, wearing the MAGA hat like that in the thumbnail: barely touching their head, so much that a slight breeze would knock it off.

Is it some sort of literal 'big brain' show off thing?

[–] Hellinabucket@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Nah he just paid a lotta money to have that hair and doesn't wanna crush it with that hat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 days ago

This is going to turn into a privacy issue with signal not Zapp Brannigan giving the codes away.

Huh, as it turns out, that group chat had about 10 million people that were over 150 years old.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You investigate the massive security breach with an even bigger security breach?

Tom Clancys Rotating Coffin Turbine Power Generation - may he rotate in peace - is going to need to upgrade the lines.

load more comments
view more: next ›