this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
615 points (98.0% liked)

Funny

8881 readers
1096 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)
[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago

Glad to see you and others beat me to it :)

[–] reka@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

hope he's doing ok, he truly is unlike any other internet personality

He was my first thought too 😆

[–] polle@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago
[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Hypothesis A:

  • his name is J. Random Error

Hypothesis B:

  • he's real, has a brain anomaly, and is taking androgen antagonists (e.g. 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors) for breakfast, lunch and dinner. It's not testosterone which has most biological effect, but dihydrotestosterone. T is just the guidance signal from the brain. DHT does the heavy lifting in tissue. If you don't want to operate on the brain, you can block the result and leave the guidance signal going wrong.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 24 points 3 days ago

Smart Hulk.

There's probably severe health complications with that level of testosterone though.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

roid raging chess club president

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 250 points 5 days ago (1 children)

username checks out

[–] piconaut@sh.itjust.works 153 points 5 days ago (7 children)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 61 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

Is that the YouTuber that couldn't grow a beard even though he was in his thirties so he had this hormone levels checked and his testosterone was through the roof?

[–] nyandere@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's because he needs to look at free testosterone, not total testosterone. Bound testosterone cannot be readily used by the body and is not an accurate reflection of one's sexual health.

So yeah, his T serum can be above 1,000 ng/dL and he could be a babyface.

Most notorious reason for low free testosterone is lack of sleep, which can also be indicated by high reverse t3.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Jesse, what the fuck are you talking about?

It's in the video, somebody linked it. He has testosterone over 1,500 and super high SHBG. He's 31 and has never really grown a beard so it's probably always been high. If it's cancer then it's a very slow one. Probably just a genetic variation that produces high SHBG and the body produces more testosterone to compensate. Hard to predict what kind of problems it might give him down the road since it's probably rare.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Jesus Christ he's in his 30s?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Could be someone with mild testosterone insensitivity, people like that often have elevated testosterone levels without the effects of elevated testosterone levels.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Probably bald and sad

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (4 children)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So is Sir Patrick Stewart. So what.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chewget@lemm.ee 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is that the laser, electricity, microwave, etc. YouTube channel guy who has a medical condition causing super high testosterone?

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

So I'm not a data scientist but doesn't this basically say that your testosterone and IQ are pretty independent of each other?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

No, the big cloud of data points says they are pretty dependent and the little outlier says outliers can exist.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am a scientist and it pisses me off that the independent variable is on the y axis

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

The depiction does not tell you anything since you cannot see structure in the black blob. It shows that outliers do exist which is expected since biology is messy.

There is the slightest anti correlation for measured testosterone levels and IQ, but on the individual level this is meaningless. There are people with testosterone resistance to various levels which would require diligent treatment to destill a more useful graph, but that's infeasible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 67 points 5 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 55 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He’s as smart as Ben Shapiro thinks he is, and as manly as Andrew Tate thinks he is.

[–] Condiment2085@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Yessir, that's the saucer what took muh cousin Darryl.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 57 points 5 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"YEAH, QUANTUM MECHANICS, BITCH! GARGLE MY QUARKS! ONE IS UP AND ONE IS DOWN SO THEY DON'T COLLIDE!"

*bench presses quantum computer in lab coat, but it is open to show off his abs.

load more comments (1 replies)

Danny DeVito

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

Pictured: Outlier (155 IQ, 1650 testosterone ng/dl) carries control (110 IQ, 800 testosterone ng/dl).

[–] phlegmy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago
[–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Testosterone Georg, who live in a library and dopes up on T is an outlier and should not have been counted.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] smee@poeng.link 32 points 5 days ago

What must his life be like?

Full of testosterone supplements and cheating.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 3 days ago

Presidential. /s

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I know that guy, he's sound.

[–] Garyu@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Anyone have a link to the source

Edit: I need this for a argument I’m currently having

[–] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I googled but could not find source. I only found more memes based on this graph. Which isn't to say it's fake, could simply be in some research paper hidden away under a paywall. 15k sample is a very big study though.

The graph alone is highly problematic to make any argument though as it doesn't specify other critical axis such as age which would highly change the meaning of this graph. The older you are, T levels fall, but your IQ increases. So age alone can potentially explain the phenomenon we're seeing here.

My attempt to find the graph only resulted in many counter points, however.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 28 points 5 days ago

Smartest, manliest human?

It's clearly about me. Life still sucks. My gigantic penis just gets in the way and people don't like nerds 🤡

[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Duh, it’s Johnny Kim. Navy Seal, astronaut, and Harvard MD. One man.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›