I can't tell if this guy is doing a bit or not
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
137 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
447 readers
429 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
“Offensive humor” mfs when they listen to a comedian that tells actually offensive jokes.
Tangent time: This is how masculinity standards are bullshit. Bill Burr carries himself as just a guy, and the whole ‘not welcome at hooters’ line is literally weird alpha male code word for taking away his man card. Sorry, that’s always something that bothered me.
What even is the point of hooters? Just go to a strip club dumbass if you’re that horn
Can't take my toddler to a strip club buffet because of woke!
His ass is not welcome at Hooters 
bald
based, if we are talking about his recent antics
is he like cancelled cancelled? I've only seen 1 bit by him and he seemed cool
You learn this pretty quickly when you bet on meme stocks. Down 90% then up 100% I can assure you, you are no where near where you started.
there are people who graduated high school with better grades than you got who think like this
I was a real piece of shit in high school, so I'm not surprised.
The thing that really weirds me out is when someone who was less shitty than me in highschool is now a much worse person than I am. Peaking in highschool must be the worst fucking way to live your life.
100 * 0.9 = 90
90 * 1.1 = 99
My brain works like
100 - 100*(10/100) = 90
90 + 90*(10/100) = 99
common core?
Genuinely curious I am like 40 years old
Greek school. 37, so same age.
Ah I'm in US so maybe this is one of those rare occasions where the US took an actually good idea from europe. I hear it's a better system.
Common core is more like this:
47+36 = ?
(break it down into smaller, easier math)
We take away the single digit numbers and add them separately:
7+6 = 13(10 and 3, hold onto these)
Then we take the two digit numbers and add them:
40+30=70
Then we add the 3 and then the ten from before (or vice-versa):
70+3 = 73
73+10 = 83
It seems convoluted to people who haven't tried it, but with a bit of practice it gets really easy to do fairly complex arithmetic in your head.
It's not hard to learn either, I'm only a couple of years younger than you and I've picked this up in the last 5 years or so, I'm much better at doing everyday math than I was when I had graduated high-school.
I don't think I was ever taught this, but that's more or less how I do arithmetic. More precisely, my mental arithmetic would transcribe to:
47 + 36 = 47 + (30 + 6) = (47 + 6) + 30 = 53 + 30 = 83
I was never taught it in school, but learned later that cutting arithmetic into chunks makes it much easier, though there is much more than one way to do that, I just used how I do it in my head, but other people might find it easier to do it other ways for sure.
I think they're essentially the same thing. I don't really have a process for what order to work in, just intuition for what will be the least friction. If it were big enough numbers I'd probably go through a second time in a different order of addition to double-check.
It's just weird that I've done a lot of math and never really thought about that process. That's why you'd ideally want any math below precalc to be taught by someone with a math education degree rather than someone who just has a math degree. When you've used the concepts you're teaching with enough regulatity that they're second nature, you have very poor intuition for which concepts will trip up someone learning for the first time.
Same, but instead of "*(10/100)" I just go: "drop the last zero"
If you're getting outmathed by Andrew Yang, maybe sit numbers conversations out :/
gonna call my buddy Greg who is an expert in most numbers
At work I created a simple spreadsheet to help with a task where you have to add two values in a row together and then subtract a third and then round up to the next multiple of eight. All of these are whole numbers, most of which are less than thirty. A substantial number of the people I work with clearly struggle with it and I'm constantly finding mistakes from when they use it stemming from bad arithmetic.
Realizing this was actually what made me give up on organizing here more than anything else. If Americans can't do first grade level arithmetic no wonder they're so clueless as to how badly they're getting screwed over.
people turning down raises because they don't understand tax brackets
"Fuckin' ~~magnets~~ percentages! How do they work?"
It's also caused by vague wording. "Up 10%" can mean both: "up by 10 percentage points" and "a 10 percent increase"
I know that I'd only ever use it to mean "a ten percent increase" but colloquially, it can mean either. In a work email, I would make sure to specify which I mean.
This is exactly why they use basis points in finance discussions.
‱
Uuh, I don't understand the difference you are pointing
Basically, if a percentage goes up 10 percentage points, it is just an addition. "His approval rating jumped 10 percentage points from 24% to 34%." There are 10 percentage points between those numbers.
If a value increased by 10%, it went up by 10% of its previous value. "The price of eggs increased by 10% from $9.00 to $9.90" the original value gets multiplied by 1.1
They aren't talking about percentages in the original tweet, so this doesn't really apply, but I think this vagueness confuses people so I prefer to be more specific than just "up 10%"
Ooh got it
honestly considering how many people get this wrong I don't blame greg. I got this wrong until I got ranted at by a math wizz in uni, who I do thank. Shit's unintuitive!
It makes much more sense when converted into fractions and multiply, where you have 9/10 and 11/10 respectively. Using percentages outside of a fixed reference causes all the confusion.
optimistic to expect your average peon, including me, to turn percentages into fractions in their mind
But, but... percentages are already fractions. Per cent = "out of a hundred".
The % symbol even looks like a fraction to remind everyone.
Now, simplifying fractions from 90/100 to 9/10—in spite of it literally being removing a zero from each side—does seem to cause some real problems.
where you have 9/10 and 11/10 respectively
This is the one that is not intuitive
How are you at thinking about years, decades, and centuries?
If we take it step by step:—
- 10 years of a century is ten years out of a hundred.
- 10% is ten out of a hundred.
- So 10 years is 10% of a century.
Looking at the same thing another way:—
- 10 years is a also a decade.
- There are 10 decades in a century.
- So one decade is one tenth (1/10) of a century.
Bringing in the comparison from earlier:—
- 90% of a century is 90 years, or 9 decades.
- 9 decades is nine tenths (9/10) of a century.
- 110% of a century is 110 years, or 11 decades.
- 11 decades is eleven tenths (11/10) of a century.
Are these familiar enough to make sense as a parallel, or just further irrelevant confusion?
How are you at thinking about years, decades, and centuries?
not a lot, usually
It's not like I don't get the train of thought here, it just doesn't come intuitive
But, but... percentages are already fractions. Per cent = "out of a hundred".
You are correct. It's more like leaving off the Unit from a number, with that causing an incorrect conversion somewhere else.
I finally learned to convert fractions and imperial vs metric by selling drugs and working retail lol.
For example I can tell you that one OZ = ~~0.625~~ 0.0625* LB off the dome but don't ask me to do calculus.
one OZ = 0.625 LB
I think you're missing a zero, or have transposed the zero and decimal point. You need 16 oz for 1 lb, right? Or did you just give your customers really good deals?
Oh, I never learned Oz to lb. Ounce just was some weird thing like 28 grams
lol yeah meant to be .06 my bad. Of course that kind of oversight you would quickly realize while weighing stuff out
Quick maffs
view more: next ›