this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
374 points (99.2% liked)

News

28707 readers
4132 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic lawmakers led by Sen. Chris Van Hollen say they are willing to go to El Salvador to seek the release of a man who the Justice Department says it mistakenly deported there — a plan that has gained steam after the country's president said during a visit to the White House that he would not send the man back to the U.S.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world 107 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is weird but can we trust that the kidnapped guy is even still alive? The admin is super evasive about it.

[–] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

He may very well be dead. Regardless, I think we have to try; somebody’s father was literally sent to hell on earth without even being charged for a crime or seeing a judge. Trump has defiled this man’s “unalienable right” to due process. The fifth amendment to the constitution of the United States also specifies that this right belongs to each person and not citizen for this exact reason.

This is probably the biggest constitutional crisis since the US Civil War. The foundations of the entire legal world sit upon established precedent, and Trump getting away with this would basically mean the Constitution and our laws are entirely up to the executive and therefore not worth the paper they’re printed on.

We have no choice but to make this a complete PR disaster for Trump; Is he strong, or is he weak? If he is so strong, then why is a dictator of a tiny country able to tell him no? If Trump even had a shred of guilt or decency (he has neither) he would remind Bukele that a single aircraft carrier is all it would take to level everything he has.

(Note: I am not saying we should launch a military invasion of El Salvador. I am merely pointing out how laughable it is that Trump says he can’t do anything. He is, as he has always been, a weak and pathetic man whose only extraordinary talent is lying without remorse.)

[–] noride@lemm.ee 44 points 1 day ago (5 children)

At first I dismissed this idea as bullshit, but at this point, wouldn't it be so much fucking easier to just bring him back? There has to be some reason they aren't, and I sure don't believe the "they don't want to set a precedent" line floating around.

[–] droans@midwest.social 85 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I see three possible reasons:

  • He's dead

  • El Salvador and the US don't want anyone to speak about what's going on in the prison

  • Trump wants to use this as a test. If he can get away with this, he can get away with sending most anyone.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

D) All of the above

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

Ooooffff, I just had a horrible thought:

During the Holocaust, the Nazis wanted to prove they weren't running death camps, so they invited the Red Cross to visit a fake town they had the Jewish prisoners build and then pretend to run.

He might be alive and possibly even being treated well and the Trump admin selected him and turned him into a firebrand just to "dispel" all the death/work camp "rumors." If they're already taking so many notes from the Nazi playbook, this really could be their attempt to instill complacency in the masses and to give more ammo to the MAGA town criers.

Of course, all of this is just wild speculation, even if based on precedent. If this is all intentional, planned, and they play their cards right, they likely could release him just before or after the Democrat lawmakers visit with him describing how fairly he was treated and that the people charged with his care acknowledged this was all an error while taking care of him. This would provide all the cover they'd need to convince everyone that the "system" works and they're only imprisoning "real criminals." Once political adversaries start getting swooped up, this whole current scenario could be cannon fodder to claim protestors are crying wolf.

I hope I'm completely wrong and that incompetence will be the name of the game. But there are no good scenarios left either way. This shit needs to end.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Idk for sure, just speculating, but I think they don't care about the actual individual. It's not about him.

They're asserting power, defying the supreme court. It's that simple. This is authoritarianism. This is how it plays out.

Again, speculation. They start with these types of acts, if they succeed their way, disobeying law gets normalized, and they can continue and do even worse.

If I'm correct, checks and balances is falling, or has fallen. This is what authoritarianism looks like.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

I don't even know what would be "best" for Kilmar considering he came to America to flee gang violence in El Salvador so....

On the one hand: It is very probable that they just don't have any records. And it is finding one guy based on a photo of him from a month or two back in a giant mass of "hispanic men". So it is going "block" by "block" to line everyone up and compare them to a photo. Keeping in mind that his appearance has likely changed due to having his head shaved, stress/terror and, likely, violence.

And the other is that he is probably dead. Because he was thrown in a "maximum security" concentration camp with many of the gangs he fled from.

wouldn't it be so much fucking easier to just bring him back?

There's a reason he had fled to the US and was protected with asylum, and a reason that the US was not supposed to deport him back to El Salvador. He was probably dead as soon as he was sent back.

[–] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah like wouldn’t it just be best (from their perspective) to get it out of the news cycle, come up with better legal bullshit, and continue the concentration camp deportations in a month or so?

I mean they’re talking about revoking the citizenship of prisoners and trying to naturalize the land in El Salvador so they won’t have to answer to anyone because it will be considered “domestic” transfer. They could just bring him back and then ship him back when they do that.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Absolutely a good idea. Republicans have a very weak hold in Congress and keeping this visible will spook them.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 5 points 19 hours ago

While they're at it bring back the others and give them proper due process in US courts.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A meaningless gesture that acknowledges that it's OK for everybody else to be there.
Everybody involved in putting people in prison without proper procedure is a criminal.

This is a crime, the administration is decidedly criminal, and Americans are doing diddly, what a fucked up disgusting country!!!!! My blood boils reading at how insanely fascist USA has become.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And do what? Without a least an operational detachment behind them they aren’t going to be able to do anything but grandstand in front of CECOT. Bukele already said he isn’t giving anyone back.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's the thing that a lot of people keep misunderstanding. If the President of the US wants a person back from what I am going to describe as "A lesser country," only for this exact moment, and not for any other case at all, he can get that person back. Send a battle group over, and ask politely.

El Salvador does not have the ability to keep him, if we want him back.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago

It's even simpler than that - the US is paying, actively, 20k USD per person at CECOT. The US is fully in control over that arrangement.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I feel it's even stupider than that. The 2 met in person yesterday in DC. I was ready for them to bring the guy back and make a big show about how magnanimous he is to bring him back just to please the people or something.

But instead, Trump is all "well I couldn't possibly tell the great nation of El Salvador what to do," cameras pan over to Bukele, "uhhh, you want me to smuggle a guy into the US???"

You clowns are literally right next to each other, acting like the other person isn't there. Bukele could say "hey, do you want the guy back?" and that would be that. But they just play a game with a guy's life and Steve Miller goes and says he wants to do the same with everybody that looks at him wrong.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sometimes the spectacle is the point.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, and giving people a visual will help make this more real for them. I doubt this one press conference is going to be our turning point, but it's at the very least a small step in the right direction and better than ignoring this.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I applaud their dedication and willingness to fight for what 's right, but are they sure that's such a good idea to travel there in person?

[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you saying someone should warn a bunch of abject cowards off of following the only halfway courageous instinct they’re ever had?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If they die messily, how long will it be before the next courageous instinct shows up?

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most revolutions started with some kind of martyr, either one person or a group.

Union soldiers sining John Browns Body comes to mind.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I bet it would show up very quickly because they'll realize the same thing could happen to anyone of them whenever Trump wants to do it and that they need to take him out before he takes them out

Trump could throw a thousand immigrants into a woodchipper right in front of Congress and it would just be furrowed brows all around, but if a hair on a lawmakers' head ever gets touched by an official action I think they'd impeach him

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Might never see courage from Congress, but you might see some van Spronsen/Mangioni(allegedly)-esque recklessness from certain corners of the population.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago

Time to boycott El Salvador. Knit clothing seems to be their biggest export item.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Okay. Who's all going and when do you leave? Quit fucking talking and DO.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's weird how these things aren't set up as fast as on TV.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't think they could be on a plane TODAY if they actually wanted to do something?

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 1 points 22 hours ago

They might have appointments to schedule around

[–] erin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 23 hours ago

Would love to. I'm too poor.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Can't wait for them to travel there and demand to see him, only to be told no. Then they'll shrug and say "Well, we've done all we can do."