this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
1148 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck AI

2528 readers
408 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Via Xcancel)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 140 points 6 days ago (1 children)

An AI generated contest.. thats the most low effort contest ever. Glad this person did what they did and used real skill.

[–] benignintervention@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Like a book recommendation contest

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (1 children)

even a book recommendation contest could only be this dumb if the only way to participate was to shout out random words and hope it would coincide with a good book title

[–] benignintervention@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Concur. I would actually like a book rec event

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ech@lemm.ee 133 points 6 days ago (8 children)

What a stupid fucking idea for a contest. "Press a button until something interesting pops out. Best button pusher wins." Glad it got subverted like that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 5 days ago (37 children)

this is clear proof that AI art is soulless and real artists will always outperform AI

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What about the very famous equivalent that happened like a year ago where someone won an art competition with an AI generated photo?

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

poor judges I suppose

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 68 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It’s the opposite of the OP’s headline.

Aimbot works because being good at games is essentially bending your skills to match a simulation, aimbot can have the simulation parameters written into it.

LLMs are blenders for human-made content with zero understanding of why some art resonates and other art doesn’t. A human with decent skill will always outperform a LLM because the human knows what the ineffable qualities are that make a piece of art resonate.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

100% yes but just because I really hate how everyone conflates AI with LLMs these days I have to say this: The LLM isn't generating the image, it's at most generating a prompt for an image generating AI (which you could also write yourself)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The analogy sucks because it implies AI is in any way beneficial.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Generative AI or AI in general?

Because AI has tons of uses that are actually very beneficial.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

A very small example: First Person Shooters and other action games would be very boring without enemy AI.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] renzev@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why do people act like generative AI has no uses? AlphaFold2 was a generational leap in protein folding. Alphatensor was used to find previously unknown sparse matrix multiplication algorithms. These are all examples of generative ai being useful on a societal scale.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it's a bad analogy because aimbots actually get good results.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (5 children)

But they also suck out the joy and soul of games, so it's pretty apt.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fakir@lemm.ee 45 points 5 days ago

Haha, humans taking over AI jobs!

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago

Somehow they invented a contest that’s more boring than watching paint dry.

[–] match@pawb.social 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm shocked i haven't seen captchas of the form "choose which image is AI generated"

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

People who use Lemmy would be able to tell the difference most of the time, but the average person would have zero idea.

Just look at any of the YouTube videos with obviously AI generated clickbait thumbnails that get 10s of millions of views. Or all of the shitty obvious Photoshop thumbnails that existed before AI.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 19 points 6 days ago
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 14 points 5 days ago

You cheated. Of course if you're an artist, you're going to make better art than AI.

load more comments
view more: next ›