this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
197 points (97.6% liked)

politics

24140 readers
2822 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Share everywhere

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 94 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You don't hear Governors calling for protestors to take to the streets very often.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 68 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You don't hear governors refer to current presidents as wanna-be dictators either.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 59 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Republicans do it all the time when Democrats want to do things like feed children and maybe expand Medicare.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 days ago

It's COmMunIsM!!

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

This was a good speech. There are lots of rallys on Saturday. Consider attending one: https://www.nokings.org/?SQF_SOURCE=50501

[–] dugmeup@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

I mean... Isn't the LAPD under him...?

Should the LAPD not be backing the protestors if the LAPD report to the local authorities?

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago

LAPD doesn't report to the governor, their authority comes through the city so they report to the mayor who does not work for the governor. LASD also does not report to the governor, they report to the sheriff who is elected and does not work for the governor.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 4 days ago

I think it's more nuanced than that. Police should be allowing people to protest peacefully.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Isn’t the LAPD under him

No—I think the only regular law enforcement under the governor are the highway patrol and state park rangers.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

local police would be under the locally voted sheriff sperate from statewide stuff. the only division he wpuld have any remote control over would be the highway police, as that service is a statewide service under the DMV.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

California Highway Patrol has been at these protests doing crowd control so if those are under the governor it would be nice if he used those to help protestors or better yet sent them home.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mostly the CHP has been trying to keep the protestors off the freeways, which is kinda their job. It's unsafe for everyone, having pedestrians on the freeway. And it doesn't allow people who think "this is getting out of hand, I was here for a protest not a riot, I'm going to get out of here" to do so. Much less "I picked the wrong day to shop for bargains in the Garment District."

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

I feel like I also saw them just clearing out people on the street at night, although it's hard to tell with all the different kinds of police there. I also remember CHP being involved with the clearing out of protestors back when the UCLA encampment was happening. So they can definitely be involved with other things so it would be nice to see the governor back his words up with action from any law enforcement he has control over.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

LAPD is trained to keep people safe when it comes to protesting.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago

So they shoot rubber bullets at journalists...

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago (6 children)

What was the public opinion on Newsom before this current shit show?

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 63 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Newsome isn't progressive and is a very pro-corporate neo-liberal. My opinion hasn't changed, but somebody needs to stand up to Trump and it might as well be him, even if it's just an opportunity for him to posture for a 2028 run.

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sometimes I have to remind myself that a politician pretending to care and doing everything based on optics can still further the progressive agenda. Progress is still progress I guess.

He just better not win the DNC nomination…

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

He's 100% the DNC guy, he'll probably have signs that say it's his turn. Only semi good thing is he'll have a much better chance of winning than Hillary or Kamala had. AOC is the best choice and has the best chance of winning imo. Gavin is probably the 2nd best choice(electability-wise).

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Generally pissed at him for being a corporate shill who actively harms unsheltered people and takes any opportunity to get a photo op or hot take that he thinks will help his presidential run in 2028, while posing like a smarmy, aging GQ model.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

more like a playgirl model who once tried out for GQ

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

He was sucking up to MAGA and literally had Steve Bannon on his podcast.

Don't trust him he's an opportunist.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Can't fuckin stand his neolib ass.

[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He said something about unfairness in sports due to players that have transitioned being a concern that was worth looking into

Thus, many vocal trans rights advocates have blacklisted him

[–] Bigfish@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 4 days ago

Listened to the segment and yeah, he's a politician: saying anything in a noncommittal way to get people in the room onto his side. He's not principled for sure, but in this case I genuinely don't think he was airing a true personal perspective either.

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Political opportunist. He hasn't changed.