this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
251 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

85719 readers
4276 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpontaneousCombustion@lemmy.world 165 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Funny, when Europe does this, it’s called “socialism”.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 89 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can you imagine the screams of, “COMMUNISM!!!!” If Obama or Biden had done this. It’s all we would hear about for an entire election cycle. Fox “News” would play it nonstop.

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Didn't Obama do it for GM and a bunch of other companies as part of a bailout package for a period of time?

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So did Bush. It's only bad when their enemies do it. It's righteous and just when they do it.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

So if I'm reading that right they set for $700 billion worth of purchase during the Bush admin, it got reduced to 426.4 billion by 2014 and they claimed they made $15.3 billion. It sounds like they made a 3.5% gain on their investment total. A win! Yay... Only if you ignore the fact that if that money went in from 2009-2024, the money averages out on inflation to have been worth 481.29 billion. A loss of $12.15 billion dollars if they would have done anything else with it.

Overall I wouldn't be mad that they wasted that money if they had focused on structuring the company moving forward in a manner that wouldn't end up supporting a wealth divide moving forward. The CEO "only" had a salary of $2.1 million in 2024. Which actually sounds mildly alright. Yet her take home was $29.5 million when they got done throwing stocks and bonuses at her. That's after GM stock started 2024 at $55.50.... and ended the year at $35.64.

So the company lost ~36% of its "worth" and she got more than 13x her salary in stock and bonuses.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 22 points 10 months ago

Ah but a bailout package is different. That's a display of powerful capitalism. A private company so powerful it can't be allowed to fail and a government so strong it won't allow it to fail.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

It was Bush just before he left office.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 26 points 10 months ago

Yes, but it's not socialism we're seeing. It's fascism. Fascism also has state control of private industry. For a different purpose.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

And when China and Arab states do it, it's something to aspire.

Yes and no. In this context, it’s more of a shakedown-sorta thing.

[–] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 81 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Seems like the government owning private industry might stray into the socialism thing thy hate. Why not do this with something more important like healthcare? Republicans are hypocrites.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

It’s only socialism when democrats do it.

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Healthcare could help, that's good socialism. Intel is profits and power and control for the sake of it. That's bad socialism.

That way when things fuck up they can point and go SEE SEE IT DOESNT WORK! WE TRIED IT AND IT MADE THINGS WORSE!!

and if it somehow does manage to help or improve things they can now claim they did something smart and take all the credit.

Yeah, but then poor people would use it.

[–] devdoggy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Or the rental market...

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Because healthcare would help you

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

If you ask, they’ll tell you it’s different for ‘essential services’. It’s the same excuse they use for the farm handouts.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Uhhh, so much for the free market Republicans spent decades championing

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They’ll run it into the ground regardless.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Well, yeah, they always do. Republican admins always leave the economy in the shitter and saddle the nation up with debt so that the incoming Democratic admin has to spend all of their time bringing the economy back up to speed rather than implementing effective reform.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And so the current Intel chipset I have will be the last I ever own.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 11 points 10 months ago

I feel like that should’ve already been a given when the 13th and 14th gen Core processors permanently kneecap themselves if they feel like it. But that’s just me.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

small penis government 😤

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 10 months ago

AyyyyyyyyMD

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So uh, Intel doesn’t get anything, and gives up 10% of their stock because they’ve just decided to retroactively alter the CHIPs act?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, not at all. The government bought shares in Intel. When you have shares in a company you own part of the company.

[–] JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Just to clarify and add to what you said, equity shares are not stocks. The gov gets dividends and such, but it isn't stock that is bought and sold on wall street. It's all about profitability and not about speculation. If the company makes money, so does the gov. If it loses money, the gov loses money.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If tax payers are going to be investing into these businesses and they're avoiding taxes taking a share of the company is better than nothing.

I mean, it's socialism, but don't tell their voters

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Fascism is a far-right, ultranationalist, and authoritarian political ideology that emerged in early 20th-century Europe, characterized by a totalitarian, one-party state, a charismatic leader, a fixation on national decline, and the suppression of individual rights and opposition groups. It combines elements of militarism, economic self-sufficiency, and mass mobilization, often through propaganda and violence, to achieve a vision of national purity and power.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Didn't the US do a similar thing to save our auto industry? Buying in? I'm hazy on the details, been a minute, but didn't we cash out and profit?

Not saying this is the end game here, but still?

[–] witten@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Not exactly:

According to a May 2011 report by the White House National Economic Council, however, the US government may have to write off about $14 billion of its $80 billion loan.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[–] BromSwolligans@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Wasn't government cross-pollinating with industry a relevant component in 20th century definitions of fascism?

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Next healthcare?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I personally don't think any of these big companies should be privately owned. Rare win for the pedo admin. Maybe we can get 10% of the epstein files next.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Imagine bribing politicians to get tax breaks as those same politicians start to take more of a cut than the other side would have taxed you. I'm starting to think everyone that is rich and powerful are also incredibly stupid.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yes but contrary to China, USA doesn't use government subsidies to promote their own industries, or state owned companies to spy on the rest of the world. 🤪

I hope Intel survives because a Chinese (mainland+Taiwan) monopoly will not be good, but I am so sick of American disinformation regarding China.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wow. Throw 16M people off health care, then invest the 'savings' in corporations. HEy, Intel, how do you like your blood money?

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

Cool, now do Duke Energy. And Exelon. And Entergy. Etc. (Not that I trust this admin ofc, but if you want collective ownership...)

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

us taking a stake in a failing company sums up america

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Remember we bailed out Harley Davidson. Twice.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Everyone calling this socialism is a moron

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] pneumaticFax@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Could call it national socialism.