this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
653 points (98.8% liked)

memes

18551 readers
4086 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 11 hours ago

I'm of the opinion that what we call a soul is a byproduct of the physical brain and not some ephemeral, immeasurable nonsense. So if you can perfectly replicate the brain down to the spin of the quarks, then yes, the copy has a "soul." The original doesn't anymore though because that poor bastard is dead.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Also, is the river still the same river when it carries entirely fresh water?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Is a toilet still the same after it has been flushed?

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or you still have a soul that now has to haul ass to get to wherever you just teleported to.

[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

People assume teleportation sickness is from reconstruction of your molecular biology, but scientists agree it's because your soul just had to haul ass across light-years to catch up to you.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

It wouldn't be an issue if you didn't keep skipping soul leg day!

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So what would happen if the original wasn’t “destructively” scanned and was just scanned. 2 would exist. Ergo, you’re dying each time.

I’ve thought about this for over 25 years at this point. Ever since the first journeyman project game and moment where you teleport to work and it’s like you die, then come back to life, because that’s the only way it could ever work. Unless there’s some weird physics shit I don’t understand where you like slip through a wormhole or something. I don’t know I suck at that kind of physics

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The body is dying but the conscousness continues, that's where the self is anyway. Done right it would be like falling asleep on the train and waking up somewhere else but legally fraught.

[–] BunScientist@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but I'd still be the me of theseus

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

I'm already the me of theseus. Am I still me? Oh fuck. Who am I?

[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That opens up all kinds of cans of worms. Let's say you are put into a medical coma, no thoughts, only eniugh activity to sustain life. You're scanned, and a perfect copy of you is made. You both wake up in another room, at exactly the same time. Are both versions of you equally "you?" You don't know which is which. Does the answer change if a 3rd party knows, or there is no knowledge of which is which? If all that matters is continuous stream of consciousness, then I suppose the answer would be you died in the coma, and two people with your memories were born, I suppose.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Easy there, clone mauler.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Are both versions of you equally “you?”

Yes and then immediately no. Their experiences diverge from that point to become two distinct people with a shared past. It's entirely irrelevant which body is "original". Continuous stream of consciousness is overrated.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Duh, that’s the inherent philosophical construct. The body dies but a consciousness continues. What “is” consciousness. Is it a “soul” that can be extracted from a corporeal form and injected into a (in this example) carbon copy? If that is the case how does one “verify” the “extraction” occurred and the process of creating a carbon copy did not create a carbon copy “soul”? To the outside observer the scenario you describe would happen but you would die on the train and you 2.0 would pick up where you left off.

Perhaps (and far far more likely) consciousness is a byproduct of extremely high quality sensory processing with the capacity for storing both long and short term memories and attending to stimuli. But even again if we created a perfect replica of this that is all it would be, a replica. It would think it’s you, but it’s not. The original you, the you it’s copied from, is dead.

To defeat this means to upend several sciences as far as I know. Biology, neuroscience, physics. A clone will always be morally distinct, and teleportation would always ultimately result in creating a clone. What the legal ramifications of this would be i dont know. Capitalism is wild and if someone did figure this out I bet money there would be a product on the market that was rushed despite not having answered these (likely unanswerable) questions and probably protected from criticism because it “revolutionizes transportation” or some shit

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would think it’s you, but it’s not.

Cogito, ergo sum. I am not the collection of atoms I was when I was born and I am not a continuity of consciousness from before the last time I slept.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your brain doesn't stop doing things when you sleep, because if it did, you'd not be breathing.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Irrelevant, unless you think the body is an essential element of a being.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You are rejecting modern philosophy of mind so you can embrace science fiction and (more likely) wild fantasies about defeating mortality

Again this would upend everything we know about biology, physics, and neuroscience.

If the Descartes quote is all you care about then it’s potentially a different story. Like do you want to live forever or exist forever? Different things. Elon musk is probably chasing both but okay with the latter, for example

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well I'm pretty sure it's impossible technology so it's not upending anything, but mostly I just don't think the "self" is as rare and precious as a bunch of people seem to.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That’s a different argument. Is consciousness meaningful? Yes, because I like it, but of course someone who is passively suicidal will disagree. Who is right? Debatable. That doesn’t change theory of mind though.

Edit: this is an example I don’t mean to imply you’re passively suicidal, to be clear

[–] n0respect@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

If, by 'teleport', we mean: a machine scans your data and sends it to be rebuilt, then I wonder: why stop at 1? You have the data, make 9001 of me!

The creation of such a machine may actually be dystopia. Human diversity may plummet, with most of us in a predetermined role as clones.

If any clone of you has a predetermined role, doesn't that apply to yourself too? Since you're the original clone

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] notreallyhere@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago

also, take your foot off of his shoulder

[–] gerowen@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But that means the original, "real" you died and the person that comes out the other side is essentially a clone with a copy of your memories.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that distinguishable from the "real" you, though? Because from a material point of view, that's real life too.

Your cells are dying and renovating, the atoms that make up your body come and go, your consciousness is a sliver of a moment of a flow of electricity that is gone before you can even intercept a moment.

If you could track every little bit of matter that makes you, you wouldn't be able to keep an unique well defined "you" at any point in time. A convoluted system maintains your memories and self thorough that experience.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 17 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I'd argue that an instance of life is it's continued existence. An interruption where it gets fully destroyed means that instance of a life has ended. Once reconstructed, a perfect, indistinguishable copy is created, but it is not the same life.

If you were to create the copy without destroying the original, would you now be in two places at the same time? Or are there two you's in two different points in space?

The true answer to this is that we simply don't know. Consciousness is perhaps the greatest mystery in our universe

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 48 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Miles Obryan looking down at the console: Ok good, teleportation complete, noooow to destroy the original.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is possibly the scariest take on teleportation I can imagine. You get in the chamber, the button is pressed, the operator nods and confirms it's complete.

Only then do you realise that a perfect replica of you, down to the molecule, has just been created somewhere else. You realise that you teleported to work the same morning, and shiver at the thought as the operator opens the nitrogen valves to the chamber to suffocate you. Your perfect replica is sitting down to dinner with the kids you remember raising but only now realise you never actually met. Your last thought before slipping into darkness is that no one can be warned, since your memories were copied the instant before the teleportation took place.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I thought of this episode as soon as I read post

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It really is a classic!

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

"As we pursue technological advancement we should be careful not to abandon our humanity in the process."

A surprisingly relevant line for modern day.

glares at gen AI "art"

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sometimes when nobody's around, he'll let them out and do it the old fashioned way. "What's the difference?" he asks himself.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

That would kind of explain what those teleport engineers are doing all day in the transporter room. According to stardates, they kind of transport like 3 people every month or so, but always be chilling at the ready in the transporter room.

Now if they always have to dispose of the bodies in the meantime, maybe they have holographic therapy in between all the time.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course teleporters make a copy of the original.

Unless there's a malfunction in the dilithium encabulator matrix, then it would make you some sort of vacant, soulless husk that traps people in pattern buffers for fun in order to try and feel something after multiple lifetimes of torture and pain....

That never happens though.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Semicolon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Okaaay, maybe like once or twice per hundred thousand teleports, but that's like no big deal.

load more comments
view more: next ›