Now release sir killalot
Ukraine
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
❗ Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
💳 Defense Aid 💥
💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️
🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
The launcher has a maximum effective range of up to 1.5 kilometers and can fire either single shots or bursts, with an onboard ammunition load of 48 rounds.
Title
-
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
-
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
-
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Asimov wasn’t any more of a legislator than Dante was a theologian
- A robot may not damage shareholder value or, through inaction, allow shareholder value to come to harm.
I believe this is only for fully autonomous robots. These are human controlled, more like an rc car with an upgrade.
There are loops. Killing a few Russian invaders will prevent many Ukrainian killings.
There's at least one story I can remember about that.

Where’s this from?
The Foundation adaptation on AppleTV. Where, famously, spoilers
Tap for spoiler
Demerzel, this robot in the gif, kills lots of people by exploring the loophole that let robots commit genocide in supposed compliance with the 3 laws.
They also explore this on I, Robot
I don't think it will be programmed that way.
The writer of the laws himself made his career by writing an entire book series with stories about pointing out where the laws break down.
In this case I think they're broken down immediately because they won't be used.
-
Spend months in a meeting room with everything from ethicists and philosopher to machine learning specialists and developers to figure out each nuance of the rules
-
or program it to kill everything until the batteries run down and send it out within the hour
The answer in a war is always the second option.
Invaders must die
the robot wars have begun
Begun the robot war, has
From the thumbnail I thought they used an image of Johnny 5.
MUCH DISASSEMBLE!!
Hell ya, fuck them up!
I'm sure there will be no negative repercussions whatsoever.
Just so nobody assumes the worst, why don't you explain your reasoning here?
Thank you. I'm pro Ukraine, and terrified of robot armies. It's great that they are being made to fight Russia, but is that the only use this technology will ever be put to? I mean, we are already looking down the barrel of weaponized drone warfare. Basically, war sucks and fuck Putin.