352
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 103 points 10 months ago

"Just move your forests to the ocean..."

I am seriously starting to think Trump has never seen a forested area in his life. What a fucking dumbass.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago

Remember when he said that forest fires started because people didn't rake the forest enough?

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago

That's been a long running line of propaganda from the lumber industry. "old growth forests are messy and us lumber companies will clean them up!"

[-] recreationalplacebos@midwest.social 22 points 10 months ago

Which is funny because if you've ever been to an area that's recently been logged (or "thinned" as they like to spin it), the ground is completely covered by a thick layer of all the branches they've trimmed off. Nope, no fire hazard there...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Equally as fucking dumb. It would be hilarious if he wasn't who he is.

[-] Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

The guy who told us to inject disinfectant during the height of the pandemic is dumbass?

Or the guy that rambles like an incoherent 4th grader winging an oral report in front of his class:

“Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart —you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you’re a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.”

Yes. This guy is a fucking moron.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 60 points 10 months ago

Will the media never learn not to give this moron a platform ? We do not need to hear his every "thoughts" on whatever topic. People who have not grasped at this point that he is as stupid as a sack of corrugated plastic will never be convinced. Stop giving him exposure for pity's sake.

[-] mkhopper@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

He's a train wreck, and train wrecks get eyeballs which turn into sweet, sweet ad revenue.

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

Ah yes. Plenty of extra water up "north."

We should dampen the forests while California is going through historic droughts, telling people not to water their lawns, aquifers drying up, lakes going dry, and the Colorado River output decreasing and continual debates on where that limited water goes.

Fucking idiot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

His supporters are so dumb.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] JoMomma@lemm.ee 34 points 10 months ago

My solution: jail Drumpf and wet the forest with conservative's tears... they seem to cry so easily

[-] ares35@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

there's already enough toxins in the environment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] books@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I mean, that would work......

I also have a solution for gun violence. Just stop shooting people.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago
[-] Heavybell@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Guns don't kill people.

Ammunition does.

Dampen the ammo.

[-] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

My goodness, what an idea! Why didn't I think of that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hairyblue@kbin.social 25 points 10 months ago

I remember when Trump suggested raking the California forest would prevent wildfires.

He was our president then, elected by the US. It was a very embarrassing time for the USA. The world laughed at us. I didn't vote for him but he still made me feel shame for our country.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Huh... this one wasn't The Onion.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

The Onion got usurped by reality a while back.

[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

"Political satire became obsolete when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize." - Tom Lehrer

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

You know what's great about Tom Lehrer? A lot of his songs are really dated, and yet still very funny.

Also, he released his entire catalog of songs- sheet music, lyrics and audio- to the public domain.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

This guy is so detached from reality, it's surprising he's not suggesting that California asks the Jews to use their weather control device to create rain where needed.

Conservatives don't have enough backbone to actually defend this nonsense, they'll just slither away when confronted about it. Oh, but they'll still back this goddamn moron either way.

[-] NightLily@lemmy.basedcount.com 23 points 10 months ago

“They say that there’s so much water up north, that I wanna have the overflow areas go into your forests and dampen your forests,” Trump said. “Because if you dampen your forest, you’re not gonna have these fire forest fires that are burning at levels that nobody’s ever seen before.”

Absolute dumbass shit.

‘You have very poor land management,” he continued before recalling a conversation he had with an Austrian official about forest fires in that country. “He said, ‘Sir, we have more flammable trees than you do on your coast. We don’t have forest fires. We have land management.’ They take care of the land. They pick up the dead trees. You know, a tree doesn’t burn very easily unless it’s dead. Then it gets dry and it burns. The leaves on the ground – they’re five feet thick over here.”

Stuff that might be true (I'm never going to look into this) but isn't funny. Goddamn Trump sending mixed signals here.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 29 points 10 months ago

There's no mixed signal here. The signal is "America bad, I fix", and millions of idiots will continue to fall for it. The details of the 'bad' and the 'fix' don't matter.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

So, when I read a headline about a politician talking about something, and what they say sounds so far beyond ridiculous and stupid, I imagine there is probably some level of context that makes it less stupid, but just poorly stated, that the particular article has no incentive to show.

Apparently not this one, as Trump went on to blame the Governor of California for not dampening the forests, and suggested the water falling in the north is "free."

That is honestly one of the dumbest things I've read from an adult, and people cheered for it.

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I mean, his last big idea for the entire world being on fire was "rake the leaves," so if raking and watering isn't gonna work, what do we do? Nuke the forests? Draw a new fire map with a sharpie?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

As Carlin once said- “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

For one, just California is over 5 times the size of Austria. Also we know that story never happened, though.

Not so sure about “leaves five feet thick”….. well, I guess I am and it’s one of the more ridiculous things he’s said, which is a high bar. I certainly have not seen five foot deep piles of leaves in California or anywhere… apparently he’s back to the “raking” thing. Of course Trump is a total expert on forest fire prevention.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Dude. He recommended mainlining bleach and shoving a UV cathode up one’s ass.

It’s sadly far from the dumbest or craziest thing he’s said.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Spoken like a guy who has never seen the vastness of our national forests.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Spoken like a guy who doesn't put more than 5 seconds of thought into anything before spewing out his dumbass ideas. He just says any bullshit and his followers will clap and cheer no matter how insane it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rigamarole@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Wasn't the last idea to rake the forests?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Limit@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago

I suppose we should stop hurricanes by drying up the ocean.. just install a drain, really horrible ocean management.

Or stop earthquakes by putting rubber feet under cities, very poor city design....

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 15 points 10 months ago

Do Republicans know the story about the king who had no clothes on? Do they understand what it is about and how it is a metaphor? Do they know the word metaphor? Who am I kidding....

[-] Wodge@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Do Republicans know

No, they do not.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Quite to the contrary, they know that he's naked, that's the whole point. They get off on people pointing out that the emperor has no clothes, because they've built a shared identity around defending the emperor and his very stable genius choice to be naked.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

They think that's a story of inspiring a new fashion trend.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 10 months ago

Excellent work. Really indicative of a guy who spends his life indoors.

[-] Jerb322@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

And there are some people out there that are like "Yup, that's my president " What a fucking moron.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Dampening the forests makes about as much sense as trump dampening a woman without a checkbook in his tiny hands.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Sure. We’ll just FedEx all the rain water New York City received yesterday. The 4-8” they got should dampen a lot of forest.

[-] HaveYouPaidYourDues@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

California famously has extra water to just... spray down an area the size of a european country?

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Good idea, let's do that. Except there's no way to do that manually, so we'll have to use some sort of natural process...how about rainfall? All we'll have to do is reverse climate change, and then we can increase the average rainfall in California, and then the forests will be "dampened."

And it was all Trump's idea; to repeat, "anthropogenic climate change is real and we should reverse it" is now Trump's official, stated political platform.

All right, shh, nobody say anything, let's see if this works

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah about that, One tree can "drink" 600 liter water in one day. So Trump how many trees do you think are in a forest? How much water do you reckon that would be? So how exactly did you figure this should work.

Oh sorry my mistake I used words that suggested actually thinking about the problem, not just pulling shit out your ass.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Endorkend@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

Wait, I thought all they had to do was rake the forests???

[-] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 8 points 10 months ago

The moron cannot imagine a solution that doesn't involve throwing some money at. Because all his problems are solved by lawyers and/or a few million dollars, it's outside his ability to understand the scale of real problems

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

First he wanted them to rake the leaves now he wants them to dampen the forests...

[-] Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

Yes. Moisten your wood, California. Moisten your wood.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
352 points (94.7% liked)

politics

18601 readers
4123 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS