this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
214 points (99.1% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

6769 readers
881 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. Use spoiler tags in comments, and NSFW checkbox for posts.
This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 51 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Yes, I see.....

Edit: Did your mom tell you it's peak performance?

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago

Set phasers to cum.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Not just for the ladies either 😏

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Ramming speed Mister Data

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 3 days ago

Peak form is a Borg Cube. No wasted space.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 21 points 5 days ago

Get on my level, heretics.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That ship is in shape!

(Round is a shape.)

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Shape is irrelevant. Space is a vacuum. You will be assimilated.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Close, but it was actually the Wasp class that was ideal.

Spaceships are not boats! The engine is not at the back, the engine is at the bottom!

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 15 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Tag yourself. I'm "large, rolling rock"

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Is that an extra nacelle or are you just happy to see me?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For the record, Wasp violates rodenberries fairly arbitrary rules for feddie ships in that it has an odd number of nacelles.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Lots of ships do that. It was always more of a guideline than a rule.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

a rule I happen to like, lol. At least it has radial symetry so it doesn't look weird. (like that kelvin ship with one. weird)

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is peak ship form:

Also the one on the far left fits up your bum easier.

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No flared base though, might get stuck up there.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To boldly go where 2 dudes went last weekend.

Boldly going to your mom

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

Good point, I was going to say the little legs night help it not get sucked up. But I think in reality it would work more like an arrow tip and rip your asshole further if you tried pulling it back out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

USS Orbiprise

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think the Pasteur is a beautiful ship.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 9 points 5 days ago

It's the ideal form!

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I thought peak performance looked like a police box…

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not aerodynamic enough for space travel

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Does warp speed require an aerodynamic hull?

[–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Probably not. There have been a few times where someone has been outside the hull but inside the warp field and they didn't get blown off.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That would be a weird place to receive oral sex.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Borg got it right. Right angles are easier to build, and expand on. There's no need for aerodynamics in space.

Really, though, the most likely outcome is something like this:

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 5 points 5 days ago

Bubbledynamic?

load more comments (1 replies)

Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago

Captain: Red alert, it’s the Borg

Borg: Red alert, it’s the Orb

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (7 children)

This has me thinking: if ships like this are only ever in the void of space (so never needing to land on a planet or interact with any aspect of it), would there be any point to designing an aerodynamic ship like this vs a huge cube?

Like sure having a more streamlined ship could make navigating asteroid belts or whatever easier vs a huge box, but like, does it matter for the force required to make it accelerate and decelerate?

(I just woke up so this might be an obvious answer)

[–] arex@startrek.website 12 points 5 days ago

A sphere is the ideal shape to distribute the force of the atmosphere inside the ship on the hull. A cube would not distribute the forces evenly and would need to be re-enforced in places.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There are the considerations with exterior aesthetics, but it's also about being able to maximize interior space and meet design criteria. A change in doctrine after Wolf 359 was to leave as small of a target profile/silhouette as possible, so ships started becoming more streamlined. This also lead to ships being able to travel faster because that lead to creating a more efficient warp bubble around the ships.

Out of universe, Roddenberry said the nacelles need to see each other, operated in pairs, and the bussard collectors (glowy red parts in front) need to have unobstructed view so they could collect materials from space.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

According to the technical manual, the Enterprise-D looked aerodynamic because it made the warp field more efficient.

But yeah, as others have said, the rule of cool always applies.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I am not sure about how this phenomenon works in context of the warp drive where space-time itself is warped around the ship, but in universes with more conventional FTL mechanics where objects are contradictory to special relativity just accelerated to speeds beyond the speed of light, yes, aerodynamics do actually kinda come into play again.

Space isn't really a vacuum, it just is empty enough ao that we can mostly treat it like one. But space still contains a lot of particles, dust or debris for example, that with higher speeds, there is something very similar to an air reaistance, drag and all that.

However, there may be other factors that can be more important for a space craft design. If you are into absolutely overthinkinh such things, I can recommend Isaac Arthur on Youtube.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] negativenull@piefed.world 7 points 5 days ago

The honest answer: Aerodynamic ships look cooler

[–] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not if it never encounters an atmosphere, but many sci-fi ships are supposedly capable of planetary landings.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Peak performance does not include a deflector dish?

It's there, it's the blue streak about 2/3 down. That's a Medical ship so it wouldn't need as large or sophisticated of a deflector as a capital ship or science class.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›