this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
495 points (94.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

40943 readers
645 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To go deeper: some animals act curiously, others with fear, but only a few of them understand what the mirror does and use it to inspect themselves.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minnow@lemmy.world 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The mirror test is frequently cited as a means of testing sentience.

OP I think you hit the nail on the head.

[–] Aerosol3215@piefed.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Based on the fact that most people don't see their interaction with the LLM as gazing into the mirror, am I being led to believe that most people are not sentient???

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Based entirely on the opinions of people on niche social media platforms, yes.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Mmm, I mean, sentience is a gradient, right? The mirror test is where we decided to draw the line, but there are more places to do so. My toddler thinks his favorite toy has some level of agency, just as by all accounts his older sister thinks Bluey has an identity. Depending on the test, there are developmental markers where we statistically transition from failing to succeeding. Another way to look at it is that for each developmental range, we can develop tests that challenge how we perceive autonomy, which some people succeed at and others fail. We may have just inadvertently developed a test that a significant amount of adults are just going to fail as human beings.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Except it's not my reflection, it's a reflection of millions if not billions of humans.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago

Except it’s not their reflection, it’s a string of phrases presented to you based partly on the commonality of similar phrases appearing next to one another in the training data, and partly on mysterious black box modifications! Fun!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 25 points 2 weeks ago

Just think about the fact llms are basically trying to simulate reddit posts and then think again about using them.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Related: is there a name for "question bias"?

Like asking ChatGPT if "is x good?", and it would reply "Yes, x is good." but if you ask "is x bad?" it would reply "Yes, x is bad, you're right."

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's just a leading question.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It is not a leading question. The answer just happens to be meaningless.

Asking whether something is good is the vast majority of human concern. Most of our rational activity is fundamentally evaluative.

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I checked with that other gorilla who lives in the bathroom and he says you're wrong

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

lol, Is that the same gorilla that you see in other bathrooms? Or (like me) you meet a new gorilla every time you wash your hands?

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

I think he's the same guy. I used to try to bust him up but he just kept multiplying into more pieces and then coming back whole every time I saw a new mirror, so I eventually gave up

[–] lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This is a great one - although I never see animals worshipping the mirror.

[–] Rippin_Farts_And_Or_Breaking_Hearts@lemmy.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I've got a duck that prefers to dance in front of a chrome bumper or glass door where he can see his reflection than to go after any potential mates. Possibly he's worshipping the mirror. Possibly he's just really vain.

[–] lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing wrong with a handsome duck taking a little self affirmation time - he knows his value, he can't look away.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like he’s ducking handsome

[–] Rippin_Farts_And_Or_Breaking_Hearts@lemmy.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He is actually. When he washes himself he's blinding white. And when he dances he gets a little feather pompadour on the top of his head.

[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I love the idea of a bunch of woodland creatures (completely unaware of what mirrors are) investing heavily—and aggressively—in mirrors and mirror-related technology.

[–] lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Squirrels (lemmings) pooling all of their nuts at the alter, lol.

[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

Investor Squirrel 1: “All you have to do is gather your acorns right here, and they will instantly double in value!

Investor Squirrel 2: “Bro’, we’re so sentient!!!

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Or forming romantic attachments to the mirror

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

Uhmm ... you never had a pet bird Im guessing?

Seeing all bird masturbate up against a mirror is just par for the course when you have bird pets. Its gonna be either a mirror, a favorite toy ... or you.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Animals aren't cursed with the human ability to think our way into harmful and unproductive behavior due to conscious re-interpretation of information around us. Except for occasional zoo-animals in captivity that fall in love with inanimate objects.

Something something about our species basically being in captivity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Not nearly enough people understand this about our current models of AI. Even people who think they understand AI don't understand this, usually because they have been talking to themselves a lot without realizing it.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

from page 7 of Joseph Weizenbaum's Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation (1976):

screenshot of PDF of page 7: Introductionintimate thoughts; clear evidence that people were conversing withthe computer as if it were a person who could be appropriately andusefully addressed in intimate terms. I knew of course that peopleform all sorts of emotional bonds to machines, for example, to mu-sical instruments, motorcycles, and cars. And I knew from long ex-perience that the strong emotional ties many programmers have totheir computers are often formed after only short exposures to theirmachines. What I had not realized is that extremely short exposuresto a relatively simple computer program could induce powerful de-lusional thinking in quite normal people. This insight led me toattach new importance to questions of the relationship between theindividual and the computer, and hence to resolve to think aboutthem,3. Another widespread, and to me surprising, reaction to theELIZA program was the spread of a belief that it demonstrated ageneral solution to the problem of computer understanding of natu-ral language. In my paper, I had tried to say that no general solutionto that problem was possible, ie., that language is understood onlyin contextual frameworks, that even these can be shared by peopleto only a limited extent, and that consequently even people are notembodiments of any such general solution. But these conclusionswere often ignored, In any case, ELIZA was such a small and simplestep. Its contribution was, if any at all, only to vividly underline whatmany others had long ago discovered, namely, the importance ofcontext to language understanding. The subsequent, much moreelegant, and surely more important work of Winograd in computercomprehension of English is currently being misinterpreted just asELIZA was. This reaction to ELIZA showed me more vividly thananything I had seen hitherto the enormously exaggerated attribu-tions an even well-educated audience is capable of making, evenstrives to make, to a technology it does not understand. Surely, Ithought, decisions made by the general public about emergent tech-nologies depend much more on what that public attributes to suchtechnologies than on what they actually are or can and cannot do. If,as appeared to be the case, the public's attributions are wildly mis-conceived, then public decisions are bound to be misguided and

a pdf of the whole book is available here

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Huh.....so what you're saying is that mirrors are actually AI.

THAT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE!!! EVERYBODY COVER YOUR MIRRORS!!!

[–] XiELEd@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

Unironically in certain cultures there is a superstition that you should cover your mirrors at night

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I,too, like pulling random shit from my ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunschein@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

My dog used to stare at me through mirrors, so what does that mean for her intelligence? Hyper intelligent. Red heelers will take over the world.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I find this kind of Anti AI Sentience bigotry horrible!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemmie689 2 points 2 weeks ago

My dog doesn't pay any attention to mirrors, or llms.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

And here I am practising my smile in the mirror (like that golden retriever)

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

False. My reflection can't tell me that pressing the Steam button and X will bring up the keyboard on Steam Deck's desktop mode.

[–] lennee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

pressing and holding the steam button tells u every steam shortcut

[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If I understand your statement correctly, only the most intelligent creatures would understand that LLM's are themselves?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›