this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
102 points (98.1% liked)

Slop.

826 readers
457 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

frothingfash: “ShE gOt AwAy WiTh It!1!1!1!1!”

Your side WON the culture war! No one listened to her and she was a laughingstock then and still now! You have been in victory dance mode for TWELVE YEARS! More people are racist, the media bends over backwards even more for you, and now we have KOSA and another war to steal brown people’s oil because your side marketed itself as cool! And you think that’s not enough revenge for the horrible crime of checks notes making you feel like a bad person twelve years ago? So much for “you can’t fight hate with hate”, God you losers are petty.

This has to be the worst part about CHUDs. They ALWAYS win, but they’re too stupid to recognize when they win as they always do!

[–] Commiechameleon@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it's more to do with moving goal posts after winning. Sort of like the Overton window but just to fit the reactionary worldview in the culture wars idk

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly, the outrage tourists can never truly “win” in their narrative because if they’re ever not the put upon victim, then they’re no longer acting in self-defense. And if they present themselves as winning, their continued assaults are bullying at that point.

[–] Commiechameleon@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

Typical Natoid behavior, reckoning is approaching though. inshallah

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

There’s a quote in What’s The Matter with Kansas where Frank describes the sense of the right that they must tell themselves they’re losing even when they’re winning.

Hence why they cannot recognize that they’ve won. They treat the right the same way someone treats weightlifting: even if they do appreciate the progress thus far, NEVER be satisfied. Satisfaction breeds complacency.

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This isn't really true. If you compare women in video games now vs before GamerGate there's a really big difference. Look up how the female characters were dressed in Mortal Kombat 9 and then how they look in Mortal Kombat 11/MK1.

Back in the 2000s, video games were still marketed entirely towards men and girls were only allowed to play the Sims or Animal Crossing. That has shifted massively and having female characters who aren't just there for men to gawk at has been a major part of that. Having a female lead in a Battlefield/CoD game was unthinkable before GamerGate.

You could definitely argue that Anita Sarkeesian "won" and the capital G Gamers "lost". There are way more women in video games and they're less overtly sexualized than they were 20 years ago. Even now, the specter of Sarkeesian haunts the Gamers as GW plans to introduce female space marines into Warhammer 40k or sth like that. This has less to do with corporations realizing the importance of feminism and more with them recognizing women as a marketable demographic, but still.

In fact, chuds continue to lose battles on this front in the culture war. More and more games allow you to be gay. They're currently losing the character creator battle where games now have you choose between "Body type 1 and 2" as opposed to "Male and female", which they are furious about. We literally have this emote pronouns of a chud raging about pronoun selection in Starfield. As far as video games go, the wokes are undoubtedly winning.

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Damn her for inventing microtransactions, intrusive copyright protections, killing the art of optimization, and flooding the market with live service hero shooter slop.

[–] LeninsBeard@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The live action hero shooter trend was started by Overwatch. Overwatch was woke. Anita Sarkeesian invented woke. QED.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

galaxy-brain : The live action hero shooter trend was started by Overwatch
centrist : The live action hero shooter trend was started by League of Legends

[–] ryepunk@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The live action hero shooter trend started with StarCraft custom maps? I along curses at Blizzard for letting gamers build their own games.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

ah shit you're right allthough I'd say Warcraft 3 here

[–] lil_tank@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I have no idea who this is but I guess I can at least give critical support for pissing off gamers

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Anita Sarkeesian was the first target of the right wing redpill manosphere grift's movement into Gamers. I think of the attack on her as wave 1, then Gamergate as wave 2, then Baby whatever it's called as wave 3.

Asmongold and a few others exist as a community hubs for a holding pattern between finding things to target. Originally the hubs were actual communities (4chan) before online influencer culture kicked off.

[–] lil_tank@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cool woman, I hope she's alright

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I don't agree with all her takes but she did good work.

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

She put out a few videos in the early 2010’s making a feminist critique of video game tropes and cliches in game design. On the whole, she was arguing for pretty mild stuff: fewer damsels in distress, more women as self-sufficient lead characters without ridiculous fan service. The way the freeze-gamer crowd talked about her, though, you’d think she called for all men to be ritualistically castrated.

[–] Aquilae@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

you’d think she called for all men to be ritualistically castrated.

waow-based

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

Who's going to be the Louis Bonaparte after Epstein?

[–] jack@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago

Jeffrey Epstein? The gamer?

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

i wish i understood this