this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
696 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

11094 readers
2429 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I thought being able to see reactions is exactly why people are supposed to keep cameras on???

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

But not theirs. xD

[–] RAFAELRAMIREZ@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Some of us just don’t have an indoor voice… on our face.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 33 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If you want my opinion, be prepared to get criticized if whatever you presenting sucks ass. If you don't want it, stop inviting me to meetings and send an email. It's really not that hard.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah where I work some of the managers get really upset if you criticise them even if their ideas are stupid. If you go on Glassdoor look the company up everyone complains about it so it's pretty bad.

When they have these meetings to "discuss" an idea really what they want to do is just have an audience to announce it to. I always claim to be busy so I never attend these meetings anymore.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 5 points 20 hours ago

"Could you please wank your ego somewhere else? That would be nice. Thank you."

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

One of my least favorite was a manager who kept calling department meetings to rattle off some idea they had for an hour, and while in most meetings people keep laptops open to take care of work while nothing relevant to them was being said, in a meeting with that manager, no one dare should see any sort of screen and must be really present for the manager...

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 14 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I don't use Zoom, Teams, etc. But I've seen quite a few posts that suggest people hosting the meetings have to ask others to mute themselves or turn off their cameras. Do the people hosting meetings not have the ability to mute the people joining them? Sounds like a no brainer to have that feature.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 14 hours ago

They do have that feature. The hosts are just ignorant of it.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's kind of a courtesy. Just muting somebody is a bit rude

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago

I understand that, but I would imagine there would be a way to have the default be to mute everyone if you know no one else needs to talk. That way no one feels singled out, and you wouldn't be interrupted at all.

[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

every single video conference application I've used has these features

they are always self explanatory and easy to use too

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 204 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I don't know how to not be this person.

Everybody else is wrong. A meeting is for back and forth communication. If they didn't want a meeting, they shouldn't have scheduled a meeting. Just write a memo or something. Everybody has far too many meetings anyways, and you're an asshole if you waste everybody's time on extra meetings that aren't even meetings.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 90 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah seriously, body communication is still communication, this host just doesn’t want negative feedback.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 47 points 1 day ago

100% agree with this.

If you don't want feedback, make your shit meeting an email. Otherwise it's a self-aggrandizement ego soothing cheerleading session.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Had a manager once who told everyone to turn on their cams so he would "know that they were paying full attention." Heaven forbid you treat your team like professionals instead of 3rd graders!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 21 hours ago

I mean in fairness I'm often not listening, but that's only in "could have been an email" style meetings.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

I work from home and look like a homeless person during the week. I only shave before the monthly on camera meeting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just watched this GQ interview with Sacha Baron Cohen where he says:

In the real world, real people perform like bad actors. Like soap actors.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

That was a great interview, now I think that I need to watch his movies I didn't on the ground of not liking Ali G. Maybe even Ali G, too

[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 1 points 7 hours ago

He's brilliant, but sadly also a massive Zionist.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Sacha Baron Cohen was before his time. I still don't know how Da Ali G Show got made. His interview with Newt Gingrich was comedy gold.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago

Maybe miming that "jerkoff" motion while rolling your eyes was a bit much

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Inviting only people who support and agree with you to a meeting seems like a great way to run a company.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It depends on what the meeting is. There are situations where you might not agree with decisions being made, but undermining your superior infront of business partners is not ok.

Those are the kinds of problems you handle privately. Not in a meeting with other people from other companies.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

While I agree, I also think most such meetings can be held between those superiors just fine

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago

There might be questions asked. And then you need the appropriate head of department to answer it. That's why they're there while not being expected to say anything.

I've had to implement systems I did not like. Systems I thought were inferior to other methods. But when the decision is made, it's made. And when asked how we plan to implement it, I answer with the plan and the steps. I don't undermine us by expressing disapproval in the formal meeting.

It's called professionalism.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Yep and now you are committed to something you didn't want to be committed to because you couldn't say anything in the meeting.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago

You were probably already committed to it long before the meeting started.

Time for objections and concerns have already passed

[–] plyth@feddit.org 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You always talk before a meeting to decide what is going to be decided in the meeting.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That is assuming you have sane environment and processes, which is a bold assumption for a lot of people

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't you need to talk more before, if there is no sanity?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago

You seem to expect the person you talk to would listen, it's not always the case, unfortunately

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 2 points 20 hours ago
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like they don't want this person in the conversation, if they don't want to hear them, see them or know what they think.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sounds like this person just won the lottery. Apparently some people absolutely need to see the person that they are talking to, but I personally hate when my job has meetings and we have to have our cameras on. I don't need to see you. Just say what needs said or show whatever on your screen and then let's move on with the day.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've taken to putting clear tape or a little vaseline on the lense.

Everyone sees me, but the image is imperfect. I just say there's something wrong with my camera.

I'm slowly making it worse, so they get used to bad/no image.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Gonna get an email from IT saying they are sending you an external camera to use because the boss can't peep at you.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Lol, there have to know there's a problem, and I'm not telling them.

IT isn't that proactive - I would know, I'm part of it. We don't have time for stuff people do report - we're not going out looking for stuff.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Never said IT would be proactive, "boss will call IT" is what I was insinuating by saying "boss can't peep"

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Do the same thing to that camera

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

It's also such a neurotypical thing to (want to) force people to have the camera on.

Some people work better without at times.

Just let them work however they want and show trust, it might just benefit everyone. If I am not focused on showing an expectation of a facial expression I can focus on the topic.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 20 hours ago

I just let my two cats in the room sonce they can be relied upon to present their backside to the camera.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How bad can it be?

trumpface. gif

Whelp, if you can see what I'm thinking on my face, I guess I might as well say it out loud.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Say smarter things if you want more positive responses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 day ago

During our last meeting (where inexplicably 25 people where called to talk), my direct manager had to take a shit. He told my colleague who was sitting opposite of me to excuse him, should he be called while on the toilet (the order was random).

Unsurprisingly, just as he had left, it was his turn. Despite being muted and had no video on, everyone heard me laugh because it was so loud my colleague’s mic picked it up.

load more comments
view more: next ›