this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
229 points (97.9% liked)

ADHD

13012 readers
340 users here now

A casual community for people with ADHD

Values:

Acceptance, Openness, Understanding, Equality, Reciprocity.

Rules:

Encouraged:

Relevant Lemmy communities:

Autism

ADHD Memes

Bipolar Disorder

Therapy

Mental Health

Neurodivergent Life Hacks

lemmy.world/c/adhd will happily promote other ND communities as long as said communities demonstrate that they share our values.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mech@feddit.org 4 points 3 hours ago

Oh shit this hits deep.
The column "things to avoid" might as well be titled "what my wife does".

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 13 points 8 hours ago

Bless my mum for patiently listening to me as I spend six hours a session talking about obscure radio and television history

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 28 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Things to avoid: No consent

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think this is meant to be "in extreme." Consent should be respected. If your partner's love language is touch, you may need to redirect to things you are ok with, rather than constant hard shutdowns of 'no.'

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Also like I've been with hubs for years even before making it legally binding and at a certain point 90% of your communication / negotiation is nonverbal with a 10% verbal clarification for when it's insufficient. Like we'll mutually get pushy / use the other if we're horny enough just because we've been together long enough that we recognize that sometimes the other person just really needs it at that time to feel loved or they need physical release or they're just too damn horny even if you're not feeling it right that second. (Mutually enjoyable experiences are very possible but usually take a few days of planning, especially to sync up our refractory periods to increase the chance of both orgasming in the sweet spot between slowly and quickly enough, more if we're planning on incorporating an by specific kinks).

There's still space to say no if you're really just sick / hurt / tired / overstimulated but at this point the default setting for both of us is "yeah go ahead just use lube" / understanding that it's on the initiator to put in the effort to receive an adequate physiological response. And you accidentally overstep sometimes but it's pretty minor and non traumatic when it's rare and you're both able to look at it from the perspective of an honest mistake. Sometimes your partner steps on your toes or runs into you around a corner too and it's not a Problem unless you're in a shitty relationship with an ongoing unidirectional lack of effort towards preventing hurtful events.

I think this is what a lot of older couples are describing who are in what would otherwise be considered a healthy and loving relationship by modern standards but where (usually the woman) states that she considers satisfying her husband's appetites to be an obligation of their marriage. I take issue with it being unidirectional (historical perspectives on women's sex drive is a whole other convo) and think they're lacking the emotional intelligence / language to describe the level of nonverbal communication they're actually doing, but I think what they're actually describing is just that they've been together so damn long that that communication has become largely nonverbal and following loose but long-standing emotional / relationship contracts. That lack of context makes for shitty advice because you can't just start a relationship there, that's a negotiation that doesn't really get settled until years or sometimes even decades in (also the thing about bidirectionality and gender equality).

TLDR; after enough years and in a communicative enough relationship you don't need verbal / explicit y/n as frequently.

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

So… I think I have 5 love languages now.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

You probably do relate to all five love languages to some extent. Most people do. But for most people 1–2 tend to matter more than the others over time.

Figuring out which ones those are can actually be pretty useful.

  • It helps you understand yourself better (why certain things make you feel especially cared for).
  • It helps you communicate more clearly instead of expecting people to just pick up on it.

You can get a sense of this by:

  • Thinking about past relationships and noticing what made you feel most valued.
  • Or using quiz-style tools as a starting point to spot patterns.

Once you’re aware of the ones that tend to matter most to you, it’s usually easier to express your needs and understand how other people show care too.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 hours ago

Yeah tahts all I got from this.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

My only critique is that the pebbling (gift) row has the giving vs receiving columns swapped compared to the rest of the table. The best way to ask is likely something to the effect of "I'm such a trinket / knickknack person. I love little stuff like stickers / keychains / little figurines as gifts!" (or whatever your thing is).

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

never heard that term and I love it

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

The ones with the females that hoard courting stones (gifted as a symbol of nest building prowess by prospective mates) and effectively use them as a rudimentary currency for prostitution, you mean? Send a little more transactional than the idiom implies, NGL.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I feel both yellow and blue here. Well... Except for the "no consent" thing. Probably is more about managing rejection or doing something without MY consent, but it sounds kinda sinister with the phrasing; like you should always consent to my request for a hug.