this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11792 readers
461 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Agreement in principle - Alberta does whatever it wants, Canada looks the other way.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

Ah. That's like every agreement so far.

How about "methane and bitumen can only be sold to federal regulators, who after local requirements are met will use the rest for strategic stockpile, x% of which can be sold off" as a plan?

Yeah. It's my way of sneaking supply-side economics and a cap in there.

Federal regulators would need to be arms-length like the CBC and use objective language to specify goals and quotas so the grifty cons can't put it higher for filthy profit -- every petro corp is at least 99% owned by America, after all.

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

~~Canada~~ Carney looks the other way

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

Albertans, Smith, the Cons, the Libs...

[–] kbal@fedia.io 15 points 19 hours ago

The basic principle they agree on: We're going to keep doing methane emissions.