this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
691 points (99.6% liked)

196

6399 readers
373 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] N0tTr0xy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 130 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the billionairs want us all to become poly

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 142 points 1 week ago (2 children)

oligarchs accidentally killing the nuclear family by making housing and childcare unaffordable

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

New nuclear family will be:

Daddy

Cougar momma

Sugar baby

Twink boy

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's way too many people to deal with on a constant basis. Ill go and live in a shack in the middle of deep forest.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 13 points 1 week ago

Fair, all yours.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

Me too, what are they gonna do? Call the IRS?

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Perfect, as the twink boy and sugar baby grow they eventually become the daddy and cougar momma. The they add a new twink boy and sugar baby. A completely self sustaining family unit. A poly dynasty

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago

Home is where the twink is?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've been of the opinion that it hasn't been accidental for a while now. No hate against poly, and I'm not entirely sure for what purpose.

Maybe they want less introspective and intelligent people having kids (because they realize they can't afford them instead of just having them on accident), so the next generation is more easily led?

I dunno.

I think they just want line to go up and can't hold themselves back from trying to take everything they can. The current generation are wealth addicts with no self control who are incapable of enacting long term plans. They are so out of touch and lack so much perspective that they can't even comprehend their own ineptitude.

Capitalists want high fertility rates so the price of labor is kept low, but they don't want to fundamentally change things to make it happen. They invest heavily in conservatism and anti-intellectualism because it's easy, but not only are the results lackluster, the costs are too high. Countries that haven't gutted public education and social services have a distinct advantage over those that let private interests make every decision, as oligarchs make poor public planners.

In the long run, the rich will not only cause the downfall of wealthy empires like the US, but cause a surge in nationalism and an end to free trade. Even if they move as much wealth as possible to their next target country, they are creating a world where they are no longer as dominant because nationalistic governments will once again taken center stage. They will never have a better deal than neoliberalism, and as that very ideology destabilizes the liberal world order, they'll lose many privileges they take for granted.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 96 points 1 week ago (7 children)

You know you can just have flatmates, right?

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 95 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] N0tTr0xy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there is no sexual obligation, it isn’t ruled out either

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Relationships fo also come wothout sexual obligations by the way, you're not required to have sex with your partner.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 56 points 1 week ago

nothing like a healthy dose of sex to smoothen the discussion of who's turn it is to order pizza

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gas, grass or ass. No one stays for free.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 19 points 1 week ago

I'm paying rent, Dave.

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where do you find a flatmate who's willing to be third wheel?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] N0tTr0xy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

flat sounds great

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Beehaw_Girl@beehaw.org 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Better to invite another couple to live with them, then they'll have four incomes, instead of a third wheel & possible homewrecker.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago

That's the spirit!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago (3 children)

yknow whats better than a polycule of 3 living in a house? a polycule of 24 living in a cool badass gay fortress

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

With gaybuchets

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

The mix of bodily fluids in that murder hole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GhostFace@lemmy.today 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Polygamy sounds amazing to everyone until they actually try it and deal with the drama like one person in the polycule only being there for another person and actively attempting to rip them out of the situation, with all the drama that comes with that.

[–] Literal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Polyamory has been relatively drama free for me for 6 years. Not any more drama than I'd have in a monogamous relationship.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think it's highly dependent on individual situations. Both monogamy and polyamory can be peaceful and delightful, or awful drama filled trainwrecks. I would argue that it is easier to have bad drama with polyamory simply because there are more variables and people involved, but it's not inherently more dramatic.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I find it freeing to not have to worry about my partners "cheating" or getting involved with other people. They found someone new? Good. They're probably a cutie who I'll get along with, even if we never get close with each other. Whether or not my partners love me or if we're as close as I want is a whole separate matter from how much they love other people. There is still plenty that can go wrong in the relationship, but other people won't be the issue.

[–] BonkTheAnnoyed@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this person gets it

the only downside is that once you figure that out most romcoms stop making any sense

Exactly. The expectation of exclusive love creates like half of the drama and jealousy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That's why we have kitchen table poly. If everyone's partners can't sit at a kitchen table together, they won't be a partner.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Polyamory ≠ unicorn hunting. It's always bothered me that people think of polyamory in such a heteronormative framing.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Unicorn hunting is cool though. Especially when you can harvest their previous blood.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Polyamory*

Polygamy is something completely different.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've never done poly, so I'm an outsider, but I wonder if those would work better when all people involved 'stop' their default relationships a bit beforehand, to reset it so to say, and agree all beforehand to start and treat each other then on equal terms.

Personally, I thought that a poly that arises from an originally mono relationship, is bound to have one of the three feel like a third wheel, rather than a true relationship triangle (where everyone loves all involved). And then it'll dissolve.

as @TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone said below, a strength is that those involved could feel freed from the worry of "do they cheat on me or not". i think it might be similar to an open relationship in that regard.

So many people make the mistake of opening up a relationship to save it, and a poly relationship started that way is usually a bad idea. In that case, there are usually deeper problems in the relationship and it was already doomed to fail. Ideally there is the expectation of being poly or the expectation that relationship could be poly from the beginning.

All that said, it isn't necessary for every person in the relationship to be equally close. Some might be better off serving emotional needs for each other, while others might be mainly sexual. So long as everyone is on board with the depth of their relationships, it isn't a problem. Like with any relationship, it's all about open and honest communication.

[–] Wutchilli@feddit.org 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unicorn hunting just got a level up ._.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No such thing as unicorns on Grindr. Everybody is looking to fuck

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My ex-husband and I got into a poly relationship. He left me and we separated. He kept dating our third for a few months. They broke up and my ex tried blaming the breakup on the third instead of taking responsibility for his actions. We were kinda toxic with the third and the whole situation icked me out. I know I didn't use a lot of pronouns but we were gay and the third was a bi man. He actually ended up dating a girl after our drama. I'm finally recovering financially from the divorce and I'm starting to date again. I'm moving out of my sister's house tmr.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Something something late stage capitalism undermining its own social reproduction by making monogamous patriarchy financially unsustainable.

load more comments
view more: next ›