this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
1026 points (98.5% liked)

Atheism

6162 readers
1241 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Unlike theists whose morality is relative to what their religion tells them, our sense of morality is absolute.

[–] Jako302@feddit.org 6 points 5 hours ago

Not really. An atheists sense of morality is just based on the society they grew up in instead of the religion they were indoctrinated with. But that morality isn't absolute, it changes a lot depending on your circumstances and way of life and everyone's a bit different in that regard.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve found that a lot of that finds its roots in their absolutism about everything.

Humankind is absolutely wicked, god loves us endlessly, afterlife is for eternity, hell is beyond imaginable punishment, also forever, if you’ve looked at a woman you’ve already committed adultery,…

Always the thing pushed to its utmost extreme.

Leaving very little wiggle room or nuance. And I think that’s by design. These people get pushed (under threat of eternal punishment) and brainwashed to spread their ideology which is very hard because it’s batshit, so they have pre-emptively hype up their argument. Again, drive it to its formulaic extreme. Otherwise none of this gets even less of a chance to land.

(Source: used to be one of em)

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Don't forget to reject and demonize the very thing that could help break that cycle: doubt. When everything else is so absolute, doubt is complete anathema. I've never met a person more sure of the world and their place in it than a devout Catholic.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

I'll entertain the spirit of the question.

Most "good choices" and "bad choices" are fairly easy to figure out. Would you want this thing done to you? If no, then do not do that thing. That's going to cover the vast majority of cases.

There are some exceptions. Sometimes one might need to balance the needs of the many against the needs of the few. Sometimes one might be presented with a set of all-bad options. Those situations are vanishingly rare, and usually limited to circumstances where group consensus can help one determine which choice is acceptable to the greatest number.

But it's not always easy, and it's not always clear. I actually had a version of this conversation at a wedding with a guy who had his master's degree in philosophy and another guy who was a devout Christian who was suffering a profound crisis of faith because his toddler nephew had just died of a brain aneurism.

The crisis-experiencing Christian asked me "Isn't it scary when there aren't clear answers?"

And my answer was "Yes, frequently. I often wish that there was an obvious or comforting answer to the terrifying conundrums of reality. But there often isn't, and it's my job as an adult to figure out what to do in those situations. Work out the moral calculus of what kind of world I want to create, try to work towards that world, and try to cope when reality won't cooperate in the ways that I wish it would."

Sometimes it's a cold universe out there, and you've got to build yourself a fire out of coherent philosophy to get through the night. Relying on dogma is a lot like a shot of brandy; it might make you feel warm for a while, but eventually the cold will get to you, and you've got to have that sustaining fire or else you're going to freeze to death.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

It is astonishing how difficult it can be for some religious people to understand basic concepts of "don't be an asshole" without religion.

I talked to a muslim woman once, who asked if I was not afraid that my then girlfriend would cheat on me, because we both weren't religious. She basically said if you're afraid of a godly punishment then you can find trust and peace in a relationship.

I plainly answered that you do not need fear of any god to be considerate and careful with someone. Nor does this necessitate morals. And if she would betray me, then she simply would be an asshole and not the right person for me.

It went back and forth like this for a while, because she seems to have been astonished that people can have happy relationships built on mutual trust without fearing magical sky people.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 48 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

I’ve always hated this question, because christians like the guy in the picture don’t draw their morality from the bible. They decide on their moral framework, then read the bible to find verses that support it. I don’t see anyone adhering to the mixed thread fabrics rule.

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, but, the scary part is that they don't think they're doing that! They've looked into the Tome of Ambiguous Stories and come out of it with whichever outcomes fit their fancy, but whichever Rorschach Lesson they learn, it carries with it the seal of Word of God.

So they can read the book (or have it read to them), come to a conclusion that vibes right, and then believe they were told that lesson by an infallible, ineffable, authority figure. One who can't refute their claimed charge.

Not a great position to debate from.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 minutes ago

come to a conclusion that vibes right,

So vibe-coding, but for religion. Makes sense.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

There can be no debate with somebody who believes that truth is derived entirely from the interpreted vibes of an apparently unfathomable entity. You can justify anything as long as you know it's coming from an ultimate authority.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 11 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I never buy blended fabrics. I didn't take much else from the bible except for the rule on blended fabrics, and the verse about a bear that mauled 42 boys for mocking a bald guy. These are the only lessons I live by.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ezekiel 23:20 is my daily affirmation

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Lol. TIL there's a bible verse about horse jizz.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 5 points 5 hours ago

That section is weird cross between fetish erotica and hate porn:

"That faithless country is like a woman that... does depraved things. Things like, uh, what's the most depraved I can come up with? IDK, donkey dick? I'm sure really lusty women like donkey dick. So this faithless woman just really, really enjoys donkey dick. And jizz, loads of jizz. Love that- I mean, she loves that. Not me. I'm severely disgusted by the vivid image of her just going to town on that big, nice-

Shit, gotta rewrite the page. Maybe keep it less graphic so I can actually finish writing it. Anyway, yeah, such a dirty woman.

What was I writing about anyway?"

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

A radical new take on religion, I dig it.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

At least I know why they're anti-gay now.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 70 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I had a guy I worked with ask me “ if you don’t believe in god whats stopping you from raping and murdering people?” I said “because I don’t want to do any of those things” I definitely looked at that dude weird after that

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

"Nothing, do you have a sister? Where does she live?"

I am a natural born asshole and don't think debating with the religiously impaired is a useful exercise.

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

My favorite answer is a question: So without God, you would murder, rape and steal? No? Well, then it seems to me you don't need God to know what is morally correct.

[–] cobalt32@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah a decent amount would. Even more would say no but do it anyways... Even back in the days when everyone believed they were eternally damned if they killed someone or worse.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Even better...

I already commit all the rapes and thefts I want to commit. 0. If you actually want to rape/steal than you're probably too far gone for Christ's forgiveness anyways.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

If you actually want to rape/steal than you're probably too far gone for Christ's forgiveness anyways.

Actually, at least in scripture, facing and resisting temptation is a virtue. There is a whole story about Jesus going into the desert to expose himself to the devil's temptation just to flex his morally superior willpower.

On a Christian blues album I listened to as a kid, there was also a song ("Fireproof", I think?) that has the devil tempt the narrator in various ways, with the result always being "Ain't no way, devil: I've been washed in the blood of the lamb. Ain't no use, I'm fireproof."

It's a whole theme. In the flavour I grew up with, there was this undercurrent of "we're constantly fighting a spiritual war", so facing temptation was a battle, and defying it a victory in that war.

Of course, that encouraged talking up the severity of the temptation you faced to make your victory look even greater, Caesar style: "Look at this strong, vicious adversary that the superior Roman Legions (under my command) overcame!" I'd credit that parish with many things, but excessive honesty is not among them.

Shame about the album though, it was a banger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 108 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (13 children)

I love what Penn Jillette has to say on the subject:

I HAVE ALREADY KILLED AND RAPED EVERY SINGLE PERSON I ACTUALLY WANT TO KILL AND RAPE.

The number of my victims is ZERO, and if your number is not zero you are sick and should be kept away from society.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 77 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

I agree with Penn, but I can't help but think that if I was given a Death Note, I would feel morally obligated to write quite a few names in it. Names of people who are personally responsible for a great amount of suffering in the world.

It's not that I want to kill people. It's that if I had a guaranteed way of stopping these people with no personal risk, I would feel obligated to do so, even if it meant killing them.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 41 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (6 children)

Someone make a spin of that old capitalist mindset meme with the button "press to get 1 million bucks but a random person dies" and they spam the shit out of it. But now it's you (and me) hammering away at that "you get nothing but a random billionaire or pedophile dies" buzzer.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 12 points 16 hours ago

Killing in defense of innocent people is morally upright nearly without question, so you’d be clean either way.

But I’m with you that if I had a death note things would he different.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I've thought about this a lot actually, but I figured it out. So when you're presented with a good choice and a bad choice, you go for the good one. Works every time.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 87 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If there's no Mom, what's stopping you from pooping your pants?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 17 hours ago (15 children)

If you need the threat of eternal punishment to be a good person, then you are not a good person.

This argument is the same that Kant made. Kant defended the notion that a person should do the correct thing for the sole reason that it is the correct thing.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 28 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Like putting the shopping cart back where it belongs

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The shopping cart wants to be free!

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 7 points 13 hours ago

That the point : we are choosing

Actually, applying a dogma is not being a good jew/christian/muslim. Theologists justify almost everything in "God let us choose between Good and Evil". Ironically, their is many learning in the thora/bible/quran that underline the need to not being dogmatic

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 78 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (11 children)

I helped out a random stranger the other day. Not gonna tell the long story but He kept saying God must have guided me and God must be looking out for me too.

I didn't want to get into with him but No bro. I helped you because I saw you needed help. And figured I was in a position to do so. I had some extra time that day and just happened to be where you were.

Wasn't God.

I help people when I can because why not ? The relief on someone's face is enough payment. Plus I feel guilty when I don't help when I can. Not from fear of damnation but my empathy requires I do something.

Strangers have helped me in the past. I know how much of a difference that can make.

It's just frustrating to have your own "good" behaviors constantly assumed to be caused by God.

No. I chose to help. Me. No one else was involved. Isn't that a better lesson anyway? That there are people who help from a place of support rather than fear of judgement. ? Or some divine force ?

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 23 points 19 hours ago

Next time you can say "God got you in trouble"

load more comments (10 replies)

A lot of those religious types scare me that one of the first things they'd do without consequences is murder and rape.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

The irony is that empathy is such a foreign concept, yet "love thy brother" is kind of a big highlight to that whole Bible thing.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 21 hours ago (14 children)

Empathy. How is this so hard to grasp?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›