this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
188 points (98.5% liked)

politics

30187 readers
2291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Let's hope they don't get a say.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

The Democratic Party is a private institution that is not obligated to follow the will of their voters. If their divergence from national policy polling is not enough to prove that, it was stated directly by their lawyers during the lawsuits related to their suppression of the Bernie Sanders campaign.

[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

I absolutely agree. I want to be clear. I hope the DNC gets no say on the future of the American left. They fumbled it.

[–] some_guy 4 points 5 hours ago

Rather than meeting voters where they are, leadership dems plot to suppress would-be future leaders. Same playbook they used on Bernie in 2020.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Who is the party? The constituents or the blowhards at the top and the army of consultants suckling off the teet of their donors? Great litmus test to admit Democratic voters don't matter. Let's see how many wanna commit to that.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 14 points 8 hours ago

If there was ever any doubt that the DNC was bought and paid for this ought to remedy that, when faced with a popular platform they fear how their opposition’s adherents

[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Really just yelling the quiet part to the nosebleeds, aren’t they?

It was never about helping their constituents. The moment someone outside of their inner circle becomes popular, the facade drops and it’s all about voting ‘correctly’ and the popular person ‘stealing’ the vote.

At least they pretended to not be vicious ghouls who don’t care about actual humans when they skipped over Bernie to hand the election to Trump.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 7 hours ago

At least they pretended to not be vicious ghouls who don’t care about actual humans when they skipped over Bernie to hand the election to Trump.

It makes me sad that we will never see Bernie debate Trump.

[–] valar@lemmy.ca 15 points 8 hours ago

"Many of us believe, as I do, that if you’re a socialist, you’re not a Democrat.”

Why thank you, no I am not.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

"Top Democrats" looking more like "Bottom Democrats" every day now. 🤣

[–] salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

House Democrats’ anxiety rises after wins by Mamdani-backed candidates: ‘Are we going to let them take over the party?’ | CNN Politics Sarah Ferris, Ellis Kim, Annie Grayer 9 - 11 minutes

Top Democrats insist that they’re unfazed by the party’s forming a “Zohran Mamdani wing,” after the New York City mayor’s stunningly successful primary night.

But there is growing angst among many sitting congressional Democrats after Mamdani allies won three primaries, including defeats of incumbent Reps. Adriano Espaillat and Dan Goldman. And, most immediately, they worry it will make it tougher to flip the House this year, with Republicans eager to tee up the Mamdani slate’s most controversial positions for attack ads in battlegrounds across the country.

“Obviously, the socialists had a big win last night. The question is, are we going to let them take over the party? Or are we going to stand up and fight back?” said Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, a moderate Democrat who has criticized Mamdani’s politics and how he’s addressed allies of Israel. “Many of us believe, as I do, that if you’re a socialist, you’re not a Democrat.”

Gottheimer and others worry that Republicans will try to yoke their most vulnerable members to what they see as far-left ultra-progressives — and they worry that it will only highlight Democratic divisions in a must-win election year.

“If you ask me, it was not a good night for New York,” Rep. Greg Meeks, a powerful New York Democrat who is close with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, told CNN when asked about deleted posts from Darializa Avila Chevalier, who defeated Espaillat, expressing support for abolishing police, prisons and borders.

Asked about the fraught relationship between the Democratic Socialists of America and the Democratic Party, Meeks added: “Instead of us making sure we put all of our resources to fight Republicans and to fight Donald Trump, we’re using it to fight each other. It just doesn’t make common sense to me.”

One Democratic lawmaker sitting in a battleground district told CNN that they are so concerned about the rise of the Democratic Socialists of America that they have recently begun having serious conversations with donors about leaving the party altogether.

If Democrats do flip the House, the number of democratic socialists in their ranks is still likely to be a small minority of the caucus. And Democrats remain confident they can still win the House in November.

The House Democratic caucus gathered for a private briefing by their party arm on Wednesday morning, where party leaders presented internal polling showing Trump underwater in key battlegrounds, according to two people familiar with the briefing. No one brought up the Mamdani-backed candidate wins. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries talks with reporters in the Capitol Visitor Center on Wednesday.

The Mamdani-backed candidates who won on Tuesday ran on the same affordability message that the party has embraced nationally, but their victories highlight broader friction over Democrats’ status-quo tactics in Washington — as well as deep divides on Israel.

“Our party nationally will need to reckon with this fact given that what you witnessed yesterday was not an anti-affordability or anti-economic policy strategy that won; it was an anti-establishment strategy beyond messaging that trumped,” a senior House Democratic aide told CNN.

Speaking Wednesday morning in New York City, Mamdani made the opposite argument, though he also connected cost-of-living issues to his longstanding critiques of US military support for Israel, a key issue in all three primaries.

“What we saw last night was a hunger for leaders who will be there on the front lines looking to make it easier for working people to afford life in the greatest city in the world,” he said.

Jeffries on Wednesday downplayed fears within his party that the wins could reverberate in battleground districts this November.

“No, Donald Trump has a working relationship with the mayor of the city of New York, and he’s made that publicly and explicitly clear to America, not once but twice in the Oval Office,” Jeffries said.

Jeffries was asked by reporters if Mamdani had made enemies on Capitol Hill.

“Listen, the mayor and I agreed to strongly disagree about some of his endorsements, and he’s got work to do in terms of the conversations that he’s going to have with members of Congress moving forward,” Jeffries, who backed Espaillat and Goldman, told reporters.

Asked if Democratic voters want their members in Congress to be more progressive, Jeffries responded: “I think we’ve got to look at the totality of all 215 members of the House Democratic caucus, and that answer speaks for itself.”

The Brooklyn representative told reporters his relationship with Madmani[sic] is “a very good one” and that the pair speak regularly.

Jeffries, who famously took months to decide whether to endorse Mamdani in the mayoral primary in his home city, eventually did back the mayor. But not all of his Democratic members from New York did.

Rep. Tom Suozzi, a centrist from Long Island, has been vocal in his critiques of democratic socialists, including Mamdani.

After Tuesday night’s primaries, Suozzi said the victories by the far left have sent a message to mainstream Democrats that they need to do better. But he doesn’t think it calls for a push toward far-left policies.

“It’s a warning that people have got to do a better job. They’ve got to work harder” to prove to voters they have solutions to make life more affordable, Suozzi said. He compared the rise of democratic socialists to the MAGA surge in the GOP.

“I think the bottom line is that the DSA and the far left — as well as the MAGA movement and the far right — are organized, and they’re doing a good job organizing, and they’re tapping into people’s concerns about their economic insecurity. I think Trump did that in his campaigns. I think Mamdani did that in his campaign for mayor. They tapped into people’s real concerns about economic insecurity. I just happen to disagree with their solutions,” he said.

But Morris Katz, a campaign strategist who is a key Mamdani ally, argued that Democrats can have a “big-tent populist party” that focuses on affordability and “invests in domestic priorities, in schools and in hospitals rather than in wars abroad.”

“I think that we spend a lot more time talking about labels than the average swing voter thinks about that,” Katz told CNN’s Dana Bash. “You see people interact with policies, campaigns, and ideas not predicated on the label they’re applying to themselves, but how are they going to make their lives better?”

And on Capitol Hill, progressives like Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna celebrated Tuesday night’s results.

“It’s a big win for the progressive wing of the party. We are a new party that will call out the genocide, tax the billionaires, and stand up for single payer healthcare” Khanna told CNN. “Our party wants a new generation leaders willing to challenge the status quo and call out the establishment.”

But one longtime Democrat, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, firmly disagrees that the results reflect the mood of the country.

Instead, he said it’s a small minority of Democrats who have run extremely effective campaigns.

“I think we have a lot of more organizing to do on the ground, especially in places like New York and California, places where DSA is is is being more influential, and we need to educate young people, we need to get more people, young people, involved on more moderate policies, just the way the other side has, and run strong campaigns,” Gonzalez said.

“I don’t think it should be a concern for people in South Texas, but I think nationally it’s a huge concern, and how they push the policies within the Democratic caucus that we’re going to have to defend,” Gonzalez added. “A lot of these policies that obviously I don’t agree with and would be very difficult for me to sell to people in South Texas, and I don’t intend to sell them, because I don’t believe in most of them myself.”

As for his own reelection, Gonzalez was confident he could still win despite any GOP attacks linking him to the DSA: “I’ve been around long enough that people don’t see me as a socialist. In fact, I get beat up by socialists.”

This story has been updated with additional details.

CNN’s Manu Raju and Alison Main contributed to this report.

[–] salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

They mispell his name as "Madmani" in one paragraph and have no way to submit a correction 🤦

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 31 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You already did, by refusing to listen to constituents. They’ve taken over, and that’s good.

[–] Neverbeaten@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago

"...Let them take over the party?"

We ARE the party. We've been the party.

Imbeciles.

[–] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 79 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

"Are we going to let them take over the party?"

They fuggen better

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable."

-- Franklin Deleanor Roosevelt, leader of the Democratic party at its most popular and most powerful

They should try to heed the wisdom of their predecessor, or they can instead demonstrate how far the party has fallen.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago

They don't have a choice. They are part of the machinery at this point.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 62 points 14 hours ago

Democratic elections happening and selecting candidates that aren't from your carefully prepared inner circle? Unbelievable! It was the their turn?!!

Guards!! GUARDS!!!

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 51 points 14 hours ago

Let them take over? You must not be familiar with how a republic works.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 52 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They let Trump take over the country...

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 10 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

People who voted for Trump or chose not to vote let Trump take over the country.

[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And what about the democrats who refused to put Trump in prison for trying to overthrow the government and raping children?

You mean the trials that got put on hold because Americans decided they didn’t give a shit so they voted Trump back in?

Those trials?

[–] gruvn@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's not fair to voters. Two elections in a row the democrats put forward candidates who were way too far right, and essentially told everyone to suck it up and vote for them anyways. You can hardly blame people for not voting. I'm not American, but I don't know if I would have voted in election either.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 1 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

You’re in dreamland if you think Biden and Harris are far right.

[–] Toothy@lemmus.org 8 points 8 hours ago

It’s not that they are far right, it’s that they are barely left if not dead center.

[–] gruvn@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm in Canada. Most of your democrats would have to run as conservatives here. And even Obama was drone-striking kids in the middle east, so maybe the lenses through which we look at the world are different.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Deal with your residential schools and get back to me about improving our country after.

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe you should brush up on your history before tossing around comments like that. (And that's not giving a pass to residential schools)

What part of history should I brush up on?

The part where the last residential schools shut down in 1996?

Thirty years ago?

[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I mean they did help commit a genocide you can't really get any further right than that.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is why American politics are fucked.

If Harris was president I guarantee you Israel would at least be restrained like they were when Biden was president.

There’s a reason that fuck Netanyahu wanted Trump to win and it’s not because the two parties are the same.

[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What restraint? Under Biden they killed countless and completely destroyed Gaza. Israel got everything they wanted from Biden who need I remind you supported Israel for 40 years while in the government.

Like every other politician until last year?

But things ramped up a hundred times after Trump got power.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Agreed. Them, too.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago

And Chuck helped in the name of Israel

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 22 points 14 hours ago

Ideally? Yes! This needed to happen when the Tea Party took over the Republicans, it's long overdue!

[–] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao no you stupid idiots, you killed the party through years of hard work.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Lack thereof.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Watch there be a record low voter turn out this year as moderates don't want to vote for communists and left-wings are upset because the progressive candidate in general isn't the exact flavor of manic socialist dream politician that they wanted.

[–] lokalhorst@feddit.org 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's almost like the 2 party system in the US garbage

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah you have a party that actively hates us, our friends, our country and democracy itself and another one that isn't perfect so let's burn down the whole motherfucker right?

[–] LuckyDevil@piefed.social 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Both of your sentiments have truth to them. The solution is something like Ranked Choice Voting, no? Of course, we'd need enough representatives able and willing to implement that change.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 2 points 7 hours ago

Too many of my fellow Americans fail to see how big of an impact the outdated plurality voting system is. They don't see how the math of plurality voting is ruining things, especially in serving the billionare Epstein Class instead of We the People. Reading about Duverger's Law and seeing how the wealthy exploit it is too boring for them. It's easier to get caught up in the D vs R puppet show than to find the roots of the problem and pull them out. Stop Plurality Voting in the US, state by state!

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It would be pretty absurd for centrists to see that choice and refuse to vote for the not perfect party, wouldn't it?

That's the comeuppance your first comment was fantasizing about isn't it?

I wasn't dreaming of any comeuppance.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Apparently a lot of people disagree with you, but sadly this is a highly possible outcome. It's also exactly how the far right propaganda machine will spin it.

People get butthurt when they hear the truth but someone has to say it in this echo chamber.