this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
502 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

20668 readers
2010 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago
[–] hefty4871@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

"Oh hi Mark" just makes me think of Severance and there's no way Patricia Arquette looks like this!

[–] OpenPassageways@programming.dev 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is what the Trojan War was fought over

[–] groucho@retrolemmy.com 1 points 11 hours ago

The face that launched a thousand ships.... away from it.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Today, some women have very masculine features. You can find some of them on fashion show runways, for whatever reason.

This, by chance, is a skull with such features. This doesn't mean all women then had masculine features, the same way not all women today do.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Or maybe the scientist just sucks at portraits

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 4 points 20 hours ago

High fashion models aren’t meant to be facially attractive. That’s what Victoria secret is for. High fashion requires a body as canvas (so be very very thin). A fierce look and walk.

[–] GiuseppeLasagna@mander.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No, I'm certain it's John Travolta from Battlefield Earth.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, no, John Travolta wasn't from Battlefield Earth, you're thinking of Keanu Reeves. John Travolta is from The Matrix.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Actually Keanu Reeves was in Terminator 2, you’re probably thinking about Matt Damon as Jason Bourne

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm no anthropologist but wouldn't her skin be a lot darker? This feels like people making depictions of Jesus look like a modern European person.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Like everything in life, tl;dr it's complicated, but no doubt she got a little more sunkissed lmao.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, one thing I've learned about human genetics is that the markers for skin color are wonky and unpredictable.

I just feel like it'd be safer to assume she was a lot darker given the recency of African diaspora, but again I am far from an expert so I could be totally off.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Idk about this team tbh. Avgi is certainly not impressed.

[–] groucho@retrolemmy.com 1 points 11 hours ago

Idk about this team tbh

They should have stopped at Bottom middle, the one between Special Agent Albert Rosenberg and guy in bar bathroom that wants to fight his reflection.

[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

well they always taught us in history class how greece was the hi mark of ancient culture.

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago
[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 125 points 1 day ago (4 children)

9000 is a really fucking old teenager.

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's like being Gandalf of all teenagers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] matelt@feddit.uk 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Anyway, how is your sex life?

[–] jeanofthedead@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

You’re my favorite customer!

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

this feels like one of those shrink wrapped dinosaur situations. like they arent doing a good job estimating how her soft tissue would have been distributed at all. why are her eyebrows so low, why are her cheeks so lean, why is there so much tissue below her lips, why is her hairline so high and with a bit of a widows peak? it feels like they put a mans tissue distribution on a womans frame completely uncritically and called it good.

edit: i think the harsh drop lighting theyre displaying this under is making it way worse too. it might not look quite as bad with softer more diffuse lighting.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah this looks completely wrong to me... Like sure, they would look very different, but they wouldn't be indistinguishable from men. Even from an evolutionary perspective that's just silly.

Even today we have women that have "facial bone structures we associate with masculinity" as they describe. It's not like we are working blind and trying to reconstruct a dinosaur or an extraterrestrial. Though maybe for some scientists, women are similarly rare.

I looked up some examples of "masculine women faces" online in 2 minutes. Even though they look "masculine", they clearly don't look like Gigachad or whatever this reconstruction is.

example photos

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 3 points 19 hours ago

Would they look very different though? Even 9000 years ago, they would still have mostly human DNA.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All three are beautiful. And in other news, I'm a gay enby.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Nobody would be this mean about her appearance if she wasn't being lit in the most unflattering possible way

[–] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I think someone mixed up the storage, and they accidentally recreated John Travolta from the Battlefield Earth movie?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It’s been a while since I’ve studied it, but IIRC skeletons of early humans show in general more traits we view as masculine, like stronger chins and a more jutting brow line, even in female skeletons. It was even more pronounced in male skeletons, but this is still pretty mild sexual dimorphism even among great apes (think male vs female gorillas, for example).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bampop@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

This is from the movie about the making of Battlefield Earth with John Travolta played by Val Kilmer

load more comments (4 replies)

It's OK, she's actually a 9000-year-old shapeshifting dragon.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

I can suddenly see why you would fight a war over Cleopatra or Helen of Troy if this is the average local option.

load more comments
view more: next ›