... i hope he never had the chance or ability to actually do anything to her physically ._.
i hope learning about what someone did without her knowledge will not scar her for life...
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
554 points (98.8% liked)
Fuck AI
7597 readers
1310 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
xAI founder Elon Musk has denied that Grok has ever been used to generate child sex images.
Well, that's a relief! Of course they wouldn't do something like that. Because that would be super illegal!
They are making their pedo dream land, with no laws or rules.
This is their so-called effective altruism.
We all know what to do.
How do you even generate ONE of those images and NOT immediately go to prison?
"FoR thE chIlDrEn" when privacy is on the line but they can't put a weirdo in prison after generating SEVEN THOUSAN CSAM images?!
Because it's never ever about the children.
Totally not about the children, says robust discourse and literal thousands of images all about the children .
"Think of the children"
And this is what happens when they do that a little too much
it's ironic how all the people barking "think of the children" turn out to be the people we absolutely DO NOT want thinking about children, ACTUALLY.
I think they think its the normal amount.
What a fucking headline. At least it had a happy ending.
So, if xAI did that, then did they get obstruction charges?
Why? This is just about a megapedophile, it's not like anybody camped out on a lawn or asked Lockheed to stop selling f35s to baby murderers.
You mean a slap on the wrist for the richest man in the world?
Horrors of this aside… is Grok using a keyword filter for CSAM detection?
I cannot even begin to describe how technically negligent that is.
Image based CSAM detectors have been around for ~2 decades, and any image host with an ounce of self preservation uses them. I’m pretty use some Lemmy instances use them. Twitter must have already been using them, even before Musk bought them, because it would be legal suicidal not to.
That they wouldn’t implement a strong image-based checker in Grok is mind-boggling.
is Grok using a keyword filter for CSAM detection?
At some point in the last ten years, everyone apparently forgot why this doesn't work
A pedophile would remove a CSAM checker? Color me shocked.
I cannot even begin to describe how technically negligent that is.
Tbh, this is par for the course for most of Elon's businesses
But even unintentionally serving CSAM is unique in that it can get you in legal hot water reeeal quick. It’s why web services are so strict about filtering.
I just can’t wrap my head around this. Maybe I’m misreading what Grok did, or maybe the story isn’t quite right, but if it is, the company should be getting raked over hot coals by the feds right about now.
Yeah, but remember who's running the FBI right now.
O.O
More likely the Epstein class will be offered given "premium private" accounts.
xAI did more to protect a pedophile than it does to protect its regular users from law enforcement.
when the 'leader' of the country is a known csam perpetrator, i'm sure it emboldens those members of the public with similar mental leanings
Techbros in the past were infamous of having a "free speech absolutist" view, and saw CSAM as "recordings of crimes". While this view fell out of mainstream (alongside with nonconsensual nudes being more ostracized), it wasn't without a lot of opposition, and an almost irreparable harm to free speech advocacy.
here here .... I concur
Yeah, this guy sort of digitally pimped his wife's kid.
Which is a lot.
I'm thinking this has to be one of the most anti social behaviors.
However, there's also, this Grok LLM. Which, tbh has said some shady shit on the internet and was abetting(?!).
That's somehow more than a lot.
view more: next ›