179
submitted 9 months ago by Kestrel@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

The measure, called Question 3, prompted heated debate in the months leading up to the election. Central Maine Power and Versant Power, the state’s dominant utilities, poured more than $40 million into a campaign opposing the referendum, outspending Pine Tree Power advocates 34 to 1. Political groups funded by the utilities and their parent companies mailed flyers and aired ads on TV, radio, and social media, urging Mainers to reject the measure, which would have effectively put the two companies out of business.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 132 points 9 months ago

poured more than $40 million into a campaign opposing the referendum, outspending Pine Tree Power advocates 34 to 1.

boy that sure sounds democratic and not just bourgeois power

[-] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 67 points 9 months ago

business as usual in international-community-1international-community-2 the bastion of freedom™ and democracy

[-] grey_wolf_whenever@hexbear.net 67 points 9 months ago

right? How is that even democracy?

[-] stigsbandit34z@hexbear.net 20 points 9 months ago

Why is there even a fucking choice in the first place

“We are introducing a referendum opposing an act that would be in the best interests of the populace”

What happens when you fetishize absolute freedom I guess

[-] CrushKillDestroySwag@hexbear.net 21 points 9 months ago

The choice is so that centrists who recognize the obviously broken system for what it is will come up with a million excuses for why the system is good anyway.

[-] ArsenLupin@hexbear.net 66 points 9 months ago

And that's while living literally one step away from one of the best state own power utility in the OECD, providing the cheapest electricity of the "western" world. Americans are a lost cause. 🤦

[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 29 points 9 months ago
[-] ArsenLupin@hexbear.net 47 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hydro Québec. Don't get me wrong, they aren't perfect. But they are way ahead of basically everyone else. 0.065CAD/kWh, while still bringing in billions in revenue to the state every year.

[-] meatballs12345@hexbear.net 25 points 9 months ago

Part of the reason it's so cheap is because they sell a lot of power to the US NW, in addition to contracts providing reserve power through reverse-pumping the dams.

[-] ArsenLupin@hexbear.net 20 points 9 months ago

It's part of it, but it was this cheap even before those deals were made. Of course geography has a lot to do with it too!

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 14 points 9 months ago

Regions who have a good source of hydro power usually the most flexibility to change up systems relating to electricity.

Its why for example Norway is capable to flip to EVs so quickly (in 2022, 80%+ vehicles sold were EVs). 95% of Norway's electricity is hydro power.

[-] ChapoKrautHaus@hexbear.net 17 points 9 months ago

But they are way ahead of basically everyone else. 0.065CAD/kWh

Lol I have to pay 0.37€ per kWh, literally two orders of magnitude higher.

[-] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think your math is wrong. .37 / .065 is 5~. A pound is worth around 1.7 cad. So you're paying around 9x the price with currency conversion, or a bit less then an order of magnitude. Two orders of magnitude would be 100 times the price.

[-] ArsenLupin@hexbear.net 12 points 9 months ago

Thank god all them hippies got those nuclear plants shut down, am I right?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] foxodroid@hexbear.net 61 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

On one hand I have an impulse to call the voters morons but it can't be right, this level of propaganda is ungodly. What exactly does a power company's propaganda even look like?

[-] Kestrel@hexbear.net 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

One of their arguments I believe was that it would actually be more expensive under public, because the cost of the buyout would be passed on to customers' bills. That probably resonated even though the cost of the buyout was overinflated by them.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 46 points 9 months ago

cost of the buyout

if that was such a concern they should've just allotted 1 dollar to the buyout think-about-it

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 43 points 9 months ago

good argument for expropriating capitalists without compensation and blowing their brains out if they complain

[-] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 24 points 9 months ago

voters morons but it can't be right

This is the imperial core, you don't have to make apologies for bourgeois proletariats.

[-] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They put a large man in a hard hat and a flannel on TV and in a heavy Central Maine accent he said "Government run power is too expensive for us taxpayers"

The voters also killed a constitutional amendment to remove a provision that was ruled illegal in federal court 20 years ago and hasn't been enforced since.

Edit: They actually voted against two constitutional amendments to bring our laws in line with federal law

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 56 points 9 months ago

funny how it takes a plebiscite the company is allowed to campaign in to create a public utility, but selling off a public utility never comes with a plebiscite?

[-] janny@hexbear.net 29 points 9 months ago

tbf they did call a plebiscite for a similar thing to sell off the water utility in somerville nj, unfortunately our local DSA chapter didn't notice it in time and started campaigning against it waaaaayyyy too late so it passed.

[-] CantaloupeAss@hexbear.net 35 points 9 months ago

our local DSA chapter didn't notice

lmao damn

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 55 points 9 months ago

Maybe next time there shouldn't be a vote

mao-aggro-shining

[-] Professional_Lurker@hexbear.net 52 points 9 months ago

All the old people were inundated with ads on their favorite radio and TV programs. Outspent 40-1 with our own money.

Democratic governor was against it.

We never had a chance.

[-] VernetheJules@hexbear.net 16 points 9 months ago

Outspent 40-1 with our own money

I sure am glad we don't have unions. Wouldn't want my money going to anything political

[-] stigsbandit34z@hexbear.net 50 points 9 months ago

The state’s dominant utilities poured more than 40 million into a campaign opposing the referendum

I think this was probably the reason

[-] RedundantClam@hexbear.net 42 points 9 months ago

freedom-and-democracy World's greatest democracy btw

[-] stigsbandit34z@hexbear.net 21 points 9 months ago

Hmm I wonder

Do proponents of a hellfire of propaganda convincing the average American (who is quite uneducated) to behave in a certain way argue “that was their choice” or something

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

People are completely hostile to the idea that their opinion could ever be swayed or manipulated. They alone are the Logical Free Thinker™️ Completely immune to propaganda and manipulation. They voted against their own self-interest because they just felt like it, completely freely of their own volition.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] YoungSheldonAdelson@hexbear.net 50 points 9 months ago

Don't ask next time.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 48 points 9 months ago
[-] Hohsia@hexbear.net 42 points 9 months ago

“We gave you a choice between a good thing and a bad thing. We may have sunk a lot of resources into the bad thing, but the beautiful part about it is that we gave you a choice unlike those authoritarian countries.”

Fucking love democracy man

[-] somename@hexbear.net 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Bourgeois “democracy” at work. I hate corporations doing this shit.

[-] charly4994@hexbear.net 24 points 9 months ago

Reminds me of when patient ratios for nurses in I believe Vermont went to a ballot measure and after a massive ad campaign it barely failed. Not like the public really understands what it's like and what's cut when you're understaffed and the slick ads tell them that it'll make things worse so they believe it. Then you get national professional organizations celebrating the defeat because they're all ghouls and don't give a shit about the floor nurse burning out after running with an 8:1 in med surg or 24:1 at rehab where you have 20 minutes to allot each person, good luck actually giving people proper care.

[-] toilet_wolf@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

there was a bill in California last year that would have required dialysis clinics to have a doctor/nurse/PA present during patient treatments, and they would have to get permission from the state's department of health before they could close clinics or reduce patient services, among other things like having to provide the state with a list of people who had more than 5% ownership interest in the clinic. Of course private health companies like DaVita spent more than $75 million buying ads that were just thinly-veiled threats like "hey you love your family members with kidney disease, right? It would be a shame if we just closed all these clinics..." and so of course the bill failed with almost 70% of people voting no.

idk how anyone can consider this country a democracy

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 22 points 9 months ago

Laughs in California's PG&E private monopoly capitalist-laugh

[-] somename@hexbear.net 18 points 9 months ago

Burns down the state from not doing maintenance on power lines. Raises rates.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 9 months ago

who are trying to raise rates another 20% while we're already paying the highest prices in the country

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 20 points 9 months ago

STUPID FUCKIN LIBERTARIANS DO YOU WANT BARBARISM? THIS IS HOW YOU GET BARBARISM

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 23 points 9 months ago

The average libertarian thinks they want barbarism because they think they'd be sitting on a throne of skulls and have harem waifus chained up around them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 16 points 9 months ago

Similar attempts have been made in my State to oust the private company in control of of energy, that does nothing but raise rates and lobby against anyone installing solar panels. There's been some radio silence after the last round of attempts.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago

Duke energy sucks

[-] FactuallyUnscrupulou@hexbear.net 15 points 9 months ago

We're gonna try something similar in my county, sucks to see these referendums get crushed.

[-] darkmode@hexbear.net 15 points 9 months ago

When was the last time that anything remotely like this happened in clapistan?

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 12 points 9 months ago

Why is something like this a referendum, just fucking implement it.

[-] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 16 points 9 months ago

They tried to work through the legislature. Governor vetoed it. So they did a citizens initiative.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mar_k@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
179 points (100.0% liked)

news

23346 readers
560 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS